Re: Can't get q.op working

Kevin, I've just tried this locally using the tutorial example data, using both a default (in schema.xml) of AND and OR. (I use the Ruby response writer because it's easier to read than XML ;) Use the default operator from schema.xml:

Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality

@Otis: I suggest we go a bit more in detail about the features solr should expose via JMX and talk about the contribution. I'd love to extend solr with more JMX support. On 9/27/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/26/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the other h

Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality

On 9/27/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: @Yonik: What are you interests in JMX? More standard & easier integration with many different tools (scripting languages, 3rd party consoles, etc). The hard part is figuring out exactly what should be exported as an MBean. -Yonik

Re: Is solr scalable with respect to number of documents?

Are there any plans on implementing a MultiSearcher into solr? I have been following the list for a while, and read quite a few topic on multiple instances of solr, in order to accomodate multiple schemas as well as break down index sizes for performance reasons. I have a use case that sits right

Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality

Ah, so I'm beginning to get it. If we build Solr with JMX support, the admin HTTP/XML(err, Ruby) interface could be written into the JMX HTTP adapter as a separate web application, and allowing users to plug it in or not. If I'm understanding that correctly then I'm quite +1 on JMX! And

Re: Is solr scalable with respect to number of documents?

I just noticed that link on the first reply from Yonik about FederatedSearch. I see that a lot of thought went in to it. I guess the question to ask would be, any progress on it, Yonik? :) On 9/27/06, Vish D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are there any plans on implementing a MultiSearcher into so

Re: Can't get q.op working

Now I feel dumb! I hadn't deployed the latest build properly. The new .war file was there but for some reason restarting tomcat didn't reload it. Anyway, q.op is working fine now. On 9/27/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kevin, I've just tried this locally using the tutorial example

Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality

First I agree with yonik, the main point is to define which classes / parts / mbeans should be exposed to JMX is the hard part and should be planned carefully. I could imagine a very flexible layer between jmx and solr using 1.5 annotations and an integration of commons-modeler. Erik, am I get yo

Re: Can't get q.op working

On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Kevin Lewandowski wrote: Now I feel dumb! I hadn't deployed the latest build properly. The new .war file was there but for some reason restarting tomcat didn't reload it. Anyway, q.op is working fine now. hey, no worries... it happens to all of us. i'm just glad

Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality

On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: Erik, am I get you right that you want to connect to jmx via an extern webapplication which acts as an admin interface (written in ruby or whatever) or are you pointing to a http/XML connector for jmx? Right. I'd love to provide Solr applic

Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality

On 9/27/06 9:07 AM, "Simon Willnauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First I agree with yonik, the main point is to define which classes / > parts / mbeans should be exposed to JMX is the hard part and should be > planned carefully. That is the hard part regardless of whether we use JMX or bare-me

Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality

On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: On 9/27/06 9:07 AM, "Simon Willnauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First I agree with yonik, the main point is to define which classes / parts / mbeans should be exposed to JMX is the hard part and should be planned carefully. That is t

Re: Extending Solr's Admin functionality

On Sep 27, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: Well, for long-hanging fruit (autumn Virginia apples): uh, it's been a "long" day: but i meant low-hanging fruit. * In a read-only fashion, everything from stats.jsp and regis

Re: Is solr scalable with respect to number of documents?

On 9/27/06, Vish D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just noticed that link on the first reply from Yonik about FederatedSearch. I see that a lot of thought went in to it. I guess the question to ask would be, any progress on it, Yonik? :) No code, but great progress at shooting holes in various st

Price facet counts based on price[] query or text field

I'm trying to figure out the best way to do filters based on price. I've been thinking that I would do it based on the query such as price[10-20], however I wanted opinions on whether it would be better to do it based on pre-filtering the item into a price range and searching for the string that

Re: Price facet counts based on price[] query or text field

if you are looking at totally cold searches, with no caching, then you might see a small performance using pre-defined constraints flagged with special terms then with range filters -- just becuase looking up the documents matching one term is allways going to be a little faster then looking up th

How much ram can Solr use?

On the performace wiki page it mentions a test box with 16GB ram. Did anything special need to be done to use that much ram (with the OS or java)? Would Solr on a system with Linux x86_64 and Tomcat be able to use that much ram? (sorry, I don't know Java so I don't know if there are any limitation

Re: How much ram can Solr use?

Yes, you'll need a 64-bit machine in order to use over 2GB of JVM heap. You can set the maximum with -Xmx16g for example. Try that on a 32-bit machines, and you'll immediately get an error from JVM telling you to go get yourself a 64-bit box. Otis - Original Message From: Kevin Lewa

Re: How much ram can Solr use?

On 9/27/06, Kevin Lewandowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On the performace wiki page it mentions a test box with 16GB ram. Did anything special need to be done to use that much ram (with the OS or java)? Would Solr on a system with Linux x86_64 and Tomcat be able to use that much ram? (sorry, I d

error on optimize

We're having something strange with our SOLR instance. When we post a commit, we get an empty reply from the server: $ curl http://search-campaign.unitedeway.org/solr/update --data-binary '' curl: (52) Empty reply from server When we post the optimize xml the following stack trace is

Re: error on optimize

Hi Steve, It looks like the commit is taking a long time and jetty is timing it out. See this thread: http://www.nabble.com/Synchronizing-commit-and-optimize-tf1498513.html#a4067023 -Yonik On 9/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We're having something strange with our SOLR ins

Re: error on optimize

Steve, something else I notice: http://search-campaign.unitedeway.org/solr/admin/stats.jsp shows that there are *many* SolrIndexSearchers open (and that's going to take up a lot of menory). There should normally be 1 and occasionally 2 when autowarming. There is also sometimes an additional non

Re: How much ram can Solr use?

On 9/27/06, Kevin Lewandowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On the performace wiki page it mentions a test box with 16GB ram. Did anything special need to be done to use that much ram (with the OS or java)? Would Solr on a system with Linux x86_64 and Tomcat be able to use that much ram? (sorry, I d

Re: How much ram can Solr use?

Does that actually work? phil. On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Ken Krugler wrote: One trick I've heard is to do cat / _*.* > /dev/null to force all of the index data into the OS cache. -- Whirlycott Philip Jacob