@Otis: I suggest we go a bit more in detail about the features solr should expose via JMX and talk about the contribution. I'd love to extend solr with more JMX support.
On 9/27/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/26/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the other hand, some people I talked to also expressed interest in JMX, so I'd encourage Simon to make that contribution. I'm also interested in JMX. It has different adapters, including an HTTP one AFAIK, but I don't know how easy it is to use.
The application should only provide mbeans as an interface for the JMX kernel to expose these interfaces to the adapter. Which adapter you use depends on you personal preferences. There are lots of JMX Monitor apps around with http adaptors like mx4j (http://mx4j.sourceforge.net) if deployed in the same container all mbeans are exposed to the connector via the mbean registry / server. @Yonik: What are you interests in JMX? best regards Simon
-Yonik
