nikic wrote:
> What release note should we use for this change?
Something like this maybe?
> Fix a regression from the 18.1.6 release, which could result in compiler
> crashes in the PPCMergeStringPool pass when compiling for PowerPC targets.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93442
__
nikic wrote:
@tstellar Per
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/95454#issuecomment-2166748656 this
is not an LLVM 18 regression, so I'm not sure it counts as critical. The fix
does look safe though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95463
___
https://github.com/nikic commented:
I like the idea, but I'm not sure this should be always enabled. This sounds
like a lot of debugging fun when a seed-dependent case is not caught in testing.
Can we have this part of LLVM_REVERSE_ITERATION instead, which is used to
detect similar hash iterat
@@ -322,24 +306,20 @@ struct hash_state {
}
};
-
-/// A global, fixed seed-override variable.
-///
-/// This variable can be set using the \see llvm::set_fixed_execution_seed
-/// function. See that function for details. Do not, under any circumstances,
-/// set or read this
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM, but please wait a bit in case there is more feedback.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96282
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100097
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100094
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1042,8 +1042,8 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::visitLoadInst(LoadInst
&LI) {
}
// None of the following transforms are legal for volatile/ordered atomic
- // loads. Most of them do apply for unordered atomics.
- if (!LI.isUnordered()) return nullptr;
+ // loads
https://github.com/nikic edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100953
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic commented:
This seems fine to me in general. The patch stack seems to be messed up though,
or at least this seems to contain some unrelated AMDGPU changes.
@jdoerfert Possibly the issue you saw is that this callback just isn't used by
the post-link full LTO pipeline at
@@ -2159,7 +2161,7 @@ ModulePassManager
PassBuilder::buildO0DefaultPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
CoroPM.addPass(GlobalDCEPass());
MPM.addPass(CoroConditionalWrapper(std::move(CoroPM)));
- invokeOptimizerLastEPCallbacks(MPM, Level);
+ invokeOptimizerLastEPCallbacks(M
nikic wrote:
As https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101150 has been merged, this one
shouldn't be needed on the release branch anymore.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100876
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lis
nikic wrote:
Release note:
> Fixed compiler-rt rtsan build with glibc 2.40 when `_FORTIFY_SOURCE` is
> enabled.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101150
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
nikic wrote:
Release note:
> Fixed test failures in llvm/test/DebugInfo/NVPTX on 32-bit and big endian
> architectures.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101145
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
@tru This is a bug fix to prevent emission of invalid IR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101875
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
nikic wrote:
That would be a question for @PiotrZSL.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101878
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101771
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102552
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102646
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,576 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64
-passes='inline,function(sroa,jump-threading,instcombine)' -S < %s
| FileCheck %s
nikic wrote:
Why can't this be an in
@@ -0,0 +1,918 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -mtriple=arm64 -S < %s -passes=instcombine | FileCheck %s
nikic wrote:
Triple should not be needed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
nikic wrote:
This test still doesn't look anything approaching minimal. Please run it
through llvm-reduce.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lis
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103302
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
Could we have block renumbering produce a map from old to new numbers, which we
can then use for straightforward analysis updates?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103400
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@l
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104657
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102881
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102741
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101521
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105314
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105314
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80731
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81633
(cherry picked from commit 25b9ed6e4964344e3710359bec4c831e5a8448b9)
>From 377c85908b8e0709c60d378eb3849f7c8bb0eb46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:41:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH]
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81631
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81633
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79523
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
A different fix for this was backported in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/147c623a86b39d6bc9993293487b5773de943dad,
so closing this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79523
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llv
https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79523
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81673
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81800
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81807
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
@tstellar Thanks, should be fixed now. I missed one necessary commit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80832
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/l
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82117
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
ping @fhahn for backport review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80832
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
Submitting this for backport, because it mitigates an LLVM 18 optimization
regression encountered in Rust. The regression is really in a different area,
but I think this is the least intrusive way to mitigate it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82347
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82664
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82925
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82965
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
This pass is not part of the default pipeline -- do you enable this pass
downstream, or do you want to add options for *all* uses of minsize, even if
there is no evidence of usefulness?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83049
___
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83067
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
> @RalfJung Are you configuring LLVM with
> -DLLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX=-rust-1.78.0-nightly ?
Yes.
> So the problem Rust sees isn't that a ".1" was added to the version, but
> rather that the name was changed from "libLLVM-18-rust-1.78.0-nightly.so" to
> "libLLVM.so.18.1-rust-1.78.0-
nikic wrote:
> As for experimenting, I was hoping that you could just experiment locally
> with local changes to LLVM. Is it much easier to experiment with a flag in
> LLVM release? If so then this is fine.
Agree that experimentation should be done with local changes to LLVM.
Options like the
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84080
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84023
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
There is a test failure.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84021
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
Note that a potential regression for this patch was reported at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82763#issuecomment-1981514318.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84039
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-comm
nikic wrote:
@dtcxzyw You should be able to push to the branch in the llvmbot repo.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84021
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84298
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -27639,6 +27639,54 @@ constant `true`. However it is always correct to
replace
it with any other `i1` value. Any pass can
freely do it if it can benefit from non-default lowering.
+'``llvm.experimental.hot``' Intrinsic
+^
@@ -27639,6 +27639,54 @@ constant `true`. However it is always correct to
replace
it with any other `i1` value. Any pass can
freely do it if it can benefit from non-default lowering.
+'``llvm.experimental.hot``' Intrinsic
+^
@@ -27639,6 +27639,54 @@ constant `true`. However it is always correct to
replace
it with any other `i1` value. Any pass can
freely do it if it can benefit from non-default lowering.
+'``llvm.experimental.hot``' Intrinsic
+^
@@ -27639,6 +27639,54 @@ constant `true`. However it is always correct to
replace
it with any other `i1` value. Any pass can
freely do it if it can benefit from non-default lowering.
+'``llvm.experimental.hot``' Intrinsic
+^
@@ -27639,6 +27639,54 @@ constant `true`. However it is always correct to
replace
it with any other `i1` value. Any pass can
freely do it if it can benefit from non-default lowering.
+'``llvm.experimental.hot``' Intrinsic
+^
@@ -27639,6 +27639,54 @@ constant `true`. However it is always correct to
replace
it with any other `i1` value. Any pass can
freely do it if it can benefit from non-default lowering.
+'``llvm.experimental.hot``' Intrinsic
+^
nikic wrote:
Please submit an RFC on discourse for this change.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84850
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84946
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84912
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83834
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84491
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85053
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85053
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84436
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84475
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84590
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84560
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84093
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85110
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -91,6 +120,10 @@ struct COFFShortExport {
/// file, this is "baz" in "EXPORTS\nfoo = bar == baz".
std::string AliasTarget;
+ /// Specifies EXPORTAS name. In a .def file, this is "bar" in
+ /// "EXPORTS\nfoo EXPORTAS bar".
+ std::string ExportAs;
niki
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85422
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85562
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
A bit unfortunate to have these changes post-release, but I think we do need to
make them.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85746
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@li
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85789
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86064
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
I don't think that this change is necessary. The InaccessibleMemOnly modelling
will take care of it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86067
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86106
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86153
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86731
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86728
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86698
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86697
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88353
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88818
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88818
…omic max (#77072)"
These changes caused correctness regressions observed in Rust, see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77072#issuecomment-2049009507 and
following. Revert the incorrect changes from the r
https://github.com/nikic edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88818
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
I'd also add that this fixes a regression from a previous LLVM 18 point release:
> Fix regressions introduced in LLVM 18.1.3 in MIPS atomicrmw min/max codegen.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88818
___
llvm-branch-commits mailin
https://github.com/nikic milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88394
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
nikic wrote:
This looks like an optimization improvement, not a bug fix, to me, and as such
should not be backported.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88394
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists
nikic wrote:
@yingopq The patches are not reverted in main, so you can base your fix on top
of the existing changes (or revert them as part of your PR, if that's easier?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88818
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing
nikic wrote:
Given that this change has already caused two distinct bugs, I don't think we
will accept a backport for it anyway, so don't worry about the release branch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88818
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing l
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89546
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90182
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
1 - 100 of 551 matches
Mail list logo