nikic wrote: > As for experimenting, I was hoping that you could just experiment locally > with local changes to LLVM. Is it much easier to experiment with a flag in > LLVM release? If so then this is fine.
Agree that experimentation should be done with local changes to LLVM. Options like these tend to get added and never removed, even if they have outlived their usefulness. I could kind of see the rationale for adding it to LoopRotate (which is well-known to be problematic in this regard, and it's plausible to assume that more than one organization would have interest in testing the option), but I wouldn't want to encourage this as a general pattern for exploration of minsize optimization changes. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83049 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits