Thanks. I am going to submit the patch then.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 19:56, Jim Ingham wrote:
> > On Jun 15, 2018, at 3:44 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Just a quick update on the state of this.
> >
> > I've managed to move VersionTuple from clang to llvm.
+1 for limiting the scope of a variable as much as possible
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 7:57 AM Pavel Labath via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Thanks. I am going to submit the patch then.
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 19:56, Jim Ingham wrote:
> > > On Jun 15, 2018, at 3:44 AM, Pavel Labat
> On Jun 15, 2018, at 1:48 PM, Pavel Labath wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 20:14, David Blaikie wrote:
>>
>> How do you handle name lookup for nested classes? They have the same problem
>> (they don't appear in all definitions) - don't appear in all descriptions of
>> the outer/parent cl
Run this in the terminal:
% pip install six
Let me know if that fixes it.
Greg
> On Jun 15, 2018, at 1:36 PM, Peter Rowat via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Here is what happens:
>
>
> prowat% lldb modTS
> (lldb) target create "modTS"
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> Greg wrote:
> > Pavel wrote:
> > That said, having DWARF be able to represent the template member
> > functions in an abstract way also sounds like nice thing to have from
> > a debug info format.
>
> Yes, that would be great, but will require DWARF changes and is much more
> long term.
I'm cur
> On Jun 18, 2018, at 9:54 AM,
> wrote:
>
>> Greg wrote:
>>> Pavel wrote:
>>> That said, having DWARF be able to represent the template member
>>> functions in an abstract way also sounds like nice thing to have from
>>> a debug info format.
>>
>> Yes, that would be great, but will require D
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:57:07 +0200, Greg Clayton wrote:
> I do agree. Probably no one else will want/need this in DWARF except us as
> I don't believe anyone else is re-creating compiler types with DWARF.
GDB-GCC try to copy the LLDB approach:
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GCCCompileAndE
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:57 AM Greg Clayton via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 2018, at 9:54 AM, <
> paul.robin...@sony.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Greg wrote:
> >>> Pavel wrote:
> >>> That said, having DWARF be able to represent the template member
> >>> functions in an
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:54 AM wrote:
> > Greg wrote:
> > > Pavel wrote:
> > > That said, having DWARF be able to represent the template member
> > > functions in an abstract way also sounds like nice thing to have from
> > > a debug info format.
> >
> > Yes, that would be great, but will requir
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21459
Saleem Abdulrasool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21459
Saleem Abdulrasool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |compn...@compnerd.org
--
You are receivin
Looks like 3:1 for having the social on July 12th... George, want to
officially call it (after confirming we can move w/ our lovely restaurant)?
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 2:38 PM Chandler Carruth
wrote:
> Twitter poll should be up:
> https://twitter.com/chandlerc1024/status/1007376443762880513
>
>
> George, want to officially call it (after confirming we can move w/ our
lovely restaurant)?
WFM, and Tied House appears happy with the move. So, July's social is
officially on the 12th now.
I'll send out an email at the "regular" time to remind people that this
social has been moved.
Thanks, e
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37840
Bug ID: 37840
Summary: incorrect results of expression evaluation
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
14 matches
Mail list logo
