> Greg wrote: > > Pavel wrote: > > That said, having DWARF be able to represent the template member > > functions in an abstract way also sounds like nice thing to have from > > a debug info format. > > Yes, that would be great, but will require DWARF changes and is much more > long term.
I'm curious what utility this has, other than tidying up the Clang AST interface part (because you know what templates exist inside the class). I mean, you can't instantiate new functions; and if you're trying to call an existing instance, you have to go find it anyway, in whichever CU it happens to have been instantiated. Feel free to start a new thread if this is straying too far from the discussion that already strayed from the original topic. :-) Thanks, --paulr _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
