Re: [lldb-dev] Looking for info on two rdars: 18684124, 15367233

Checking the disposition of these now. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Todd Fiala wrote: > We have a chunk of tests that are marked xfail that pass right now on OS > X. I'll go through those in the near future. > > I'm also seeing several tests consistently unexpectedly pass on Linux > x86_64 (

[lldb-dev] [Bug 24282] test_with_dwarf_formatters_api (TestFormattersSBAPI.SBFormattersAPITestCase) failing on FreeBSD

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24282 ema...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [lldb-dev] Looking for info on two rdars: 18684124, 15367233

Those radars are both listed as fixed. I'm building and will run the tests on OS X to verify I don't see them here. Assuming they pass, I'll strip the xfail marker. -Todd On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Todd Fiala wrote: > Checking the disposition of these now. > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:1

[lldb-dev] [Bug 23747] test_process_list (TestPlatformCommand.PlatformCommandTestCase) failing on FreeBSD buildbot

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23747 ema...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[lldb-dev] [Bug 18533] Failing FreeBSD test case test_inferior_asserting_disassemble (TestInferiorAssert.AssertingInferiorTestCase)

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18533 ema...@freebsd.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [lldb-dev] Looking for info on two rdars: 18684124, 15367233

I ran the tests against the latest official beta lldb on OS X and they are passing (unexpected successes). Flipping that now... On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Todd Fiala wrote: > Those radars are both listed as fixed. I'm building and will run the > tests on OS X to verify I don't see them h

Re: [lldb-dev] Looking for info on two rdars: 18684124, 15367233

Done: Sendingtest/driver/batch_mode/TestBatchMode.py Sendingtest/functionalities/inferior-assert/TestInferiorAssert.py Transmitting file data .. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Todd Fiala wrote: > I ran the tests against the latest official beta lldb on OS X and they are > passi

[lldb-dev] [Bug 24812] New: Expression evaluation crashes when definition of class not available for a class

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24812 Bug ID: 24812 Summary: Expression evaluation crashes when definition of class not available for a class Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux

[lldb-dev] cleaning up unexpected successes on OS X

Hey all, As of this change: r247567 | tfiala | 2015-09-14 07:48:53 -0700 (Mon, 14 Sep 2015) | 7 lines I'm seeing the following unexpected successes on OS X: Unexpected Successes (16) UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestCallStdStringFunction.py (Darwin tfiala-mbp-01.local 15.0.0 Darwin Kerne

[lldb-dev] [Bug 24813] New: TestBatchMode is not remote-ready

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24813 Bug ID: 24813 Summary: TestBatchMode is not remote-ready Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[lldb-dev] [Bug 20273] TestTargetAPI.test_launch_new_process_and_redirect_stdout_with_* failing on Darwin

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20273 Todd Fiala changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[lldb-dev] Digging into Linux unexpected successes

On an Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 system, I'm seeing the following results: *cmake/ninja/clang-3.6:* Testing: 395 test suites, 24 threads 395 out of 395 test suites processed - TestGdbRemoteKill.py Ran 395 test suites (0 failed) (0.00%) Ran 478 test cases (0 failed) (0.00%) Unexpected Successes

Re: [lldb-dev] e not working when debugging llvm pass

> On Sep 13, 2015, at 4:26 PM, carr27 via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm working on an LLVM pass that I'm trying to debug it with LLDB, but I'm > running into a few problems. I'm generally following this turtorial [1] but > I run my pass with opt instead from inside clang. So I run: >

[lldb-dev] 7th build slot?

Hi Chaoren, While looking at the Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 build bot, I was looking at the test configurations for the test slots. 6 of them are described in the build summary on the upper right There is a 7th and 8th test

Re: [lldb-dev] 7th build slot?

We gave each bot 8 slots due to some limitation with the build master. Slots 1-6 will notify us of failures, and slots 7-8 are sort of reserved for tests/builds that are expected to be broken. Ying can provide more details. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Todd Fiala wrote: > Hi Chaoren, > > Wh

Re: [lldb-dev] 7th build slot?

Okay, thanks. It would be awesome if the summary listed the specific versions of clang being used. TOT is obvious, but "clang" being 3.5 is less so. Seeing as clang behavior can change between releases, perhaps we can use the other slots for other clang versions? TOT clearly makes sense if more