Checking the disposition of these now.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have a chunk of tests that are marked xfail that pass right now on OS
> X. I'll go through those in the near future.
>
> I'm also seeing several tests consistently unexpectedly pass on Linux
> x86_64 (Ubuntu 14.04) built with clang-3.6. I think at least some of them
> fail with gcc-4.9, so they might need to be marked up based on the
> compiler. I plan to look at those soonish as well.
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Ed Maste via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Two tests are currently decorated with a @unittest2.expectedFailure
>> referencing rdar tickets. These tests pass consistently for me on
>> FreeBSD. Can I ask the Apple folks to look at these tickets and put
>> details in a public PR if appropriate? Alternatively, shall I switch
>> the tests to expectedFailureDarwin?
>>
>> Also, are these tests passing on Linux?
>>
>> -Ed
>>
>> test/driver/batch_mode/TestBatchMode.py
>> @unittest2.expectedFailure("<rdar://problem/18684124>, lldb doesn't
>> reliably print the prompt when run under pexpect")
>>
>> test/functionalities/inferior-assert/TestInferiorAssert.py
>> @unittest2.expectedFailure("rdar://15367233")
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Todd
>
--
-Todd
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
