@@ -661,27 +661,27 @@ static bool FixupInvocation(CompilerInvocation
&Invocation,
static unsigned getOptimizationLevel(ArgList &Args, InputKind IK,
DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) {
- unsigned DefaultOpt = llvm::CodeGenOpt::None;
+ unsigned De
@@ -661,27 +661,27 @@ static bool FixupInvocation(CompilerInvocation
&Invocation,
static unsigned getOptimizationLevel(ArgList &Args, InputKind IK,
DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) {
- unsigned DefaultOpt = llvm::CodeGenOpt::None;
+ unsigned De
@@ -661,27 +661,27 @@ static bool FixupInvocation(CompilerInvocation
&Invocation,
static unsigned getOptimizationLevel(ArgList &Args, InputKind IK,
DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) {
- unsigned DefaultOpt = llvm::CodeGenOpt::None;
+ unsigned De
pogo59 wrote:
> This seems akin to running clang-format on the entire project, which last
> time we talked about still faced opposition
My impression (I admit I haven't reviewed the whole thread lately) is that the
opposition has mostly to do with how clang-format mangles some constructs, not
pogo59 wrote:
> separating them might be marginally better for downstrteamers.
Hear, hear.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83702
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-c
pogo59 wrote:
As a data point, I've been setting `core.autocrlf=true` on Windows for years.
I've been trained to make sure _new_ files have LF endings (usually I copy an
existing file instead of creating a new file) but both Notepad and the Visual
Studio editor are willing to preserve the line
pogo59 wrote:
The member is const with an initializer in-class. How is the constant value not
available for the definition?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71780
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.or
pogo59 wrote:
I think it is a valuable bit of information for the debugger, to know the
constant value without having to read it from memory. I think we should emit
both the location and the value.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71780
___