================
@@ -661,27 +661,27 @@ static bool FixupInvocation(CompilerInvocation
&Invocation,
static unsigned getOptimizationLevel(ArgList &Args, InputKind IK,
DiagnosticsEngine &Diags) {
- unsigned DefaultOpt = llvm::CodeGenOpt::None;
+ unsigned DefaultOpt = 0;
if ((IK.getLanguage() == Language::OpenCL ||
IK.getLanguage() == Language::OpenCLCXX) &&
!Args.hasArg(OPT_cl_opt_disable))
- DefaultOpt = llvm::CodeGenOpt::Default;
+ DefaultOpt = 2;
----------------
pogo59 wrote:
Actually it looks to me like clang only cares about 0/not-0, and the specific
non-zero number is irrelevant. So, internally clang codegen would be better off
with a simple Optimize bool. (It looks like LangOpts does it this way already.)
CodeGenOpts probably does need to track the actual user-specified level to pass
down to LLVM, but it doesn't need it for its own purposes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66295
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
