Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-02-19T20:32:00-08:00
New Revision: 58279d1ee1b567e8ca793d6d1eb6e0f1d5e7279e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58279d1ee1b567e8ca793d6d1eb6e0f1d5e7279e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/58279d1ee1b567e8ca793d6d1eb6e0f1d5e7279e.d
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126630
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-02-19T21:09:32-08:00
New Revision: 57bac14f4bcc8b43edc3e27be3d93609f7f4037b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/57bac14f4bcc8b43edc3e27be3d93609f7f4037b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/57bac14f4bcc8b43edc3e27be3d93609f7f4037b.d
https://github.com/JDevlieghere created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127961
Make StreamAsynchronousIO an unique_ptr instead of a shared_ptr. I tried
passing the class by value, but the llvm::raw_ostream forwarded stored in the
Stream parent class isn't movable and I don't think it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Jonas Devlieghere (JDevlieghere)
Changes
Make StreamAsynchronousIO an unique_ptr instead of a shared_ptr. I tried
passing the class by value, but the llvm::raw_ostream forwarder stored in the
Stream parent class isn't movable and I don't t
https://github.com/JDevlieghere edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127961
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -652,6 +652,153 @@ def haltReason(self):
)
self.match("register read s31", ["s31 = 128"])
+@skipIfXmlSupportMissing
+@skipIfRemote
+@skipIfLLVMTargetMissing("RISCV")
+def test_riscv64_regs(self):
+"""Test grabbing various riscv64 regi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 5ecce45ea2980aff35d1283d4dd3feb8f74de16c
11efc09e1ab9ffcca8e965906530af995f5c8c83 --e
https://github.com/clayborg requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124648
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126630
>From 8471301ad9dd694e1e6f3116d4e4ee0422c9b1dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:30:29 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Synchronize the debugger's output & error stream
@@ -428,14 +453,35 @@ void ProgressEventThreadFunction(DAP &dap) {
done = true;
}
} else {
-uint64_t progress_id = 0;
-uint64_t completed = 0;
-uint64_t total = 0;
-bool is_debugger_specific = false;
-const char *m
@@ -68,10 +78,23 @@ def __call__(self, debugger, command, exe_ctx, result):
return
total = cmd_options.total
-progress = lldb.SBProgress("Progress tester", "Detail", total,
debugger)
+if total == -1:
clayborg wrote:
Defaul
@@ -37,7 +37,10 @@ def create_options(cls):
)
parser.add_option(
-"--total", dest="total", help="Total to count up.", type="int"
+"--total",
+dest="total",
+help="Total to count up, use -1 to identify as indetermi
@@ -37,7 +37,10 @@ def create_options(cls):
)
parser.add_option(
-"--total", dest="total", help="Total to count up.", type="int"
+"--total",
+dest="total",
+help="Total to count up, use -1 to identify as indetermi
@@ -428,14 +453,35 @@ void ProgressEventThreadFunction(DAP &dap) {
done = true;
}
} else {
-uint64_t progress_id = 0;
-uint64_t completed = 0;
-uint64_t total = 0;
-bool is_debugger_specific = false;
-const char *m
@@ -428,14 +453,35 @@ void ProgressEventThreadFunction(DAP &dap) {
done = true;
}
} else {
-uint64_t progress_id = 0;
-uint64_t completed = 0;
-uint64_t total = 0;
-bool is_debugger_specific = false;
-const char *m
@@ -428,14 +453,35 @@ void ProgressEventThreadFunction(DAP &dap) {
done = true;
}
} else {
-uint64_t progress_id = 0;
-uint64_t completed = 0;
-uint64_t total = 0;
-bool is_debugger_specific = false;
-const char *m
@@ -56,13 +60,83 @@ struct LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo : public
llvm::telemetry::TelemetryInfo {
void serialize(llvm::telemetry::Serializer &serializer) const override;
};
+/// Describes the exit status of a debugger.
+struct ExitDescription {
+ int exit_code;
+ std::string des
https://github.com/JDevlieghere edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127696
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Jlalond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124648
>From 12ff645735c1dbf51e58b9f80d4e3e13a0babdf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Lalonde
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:41:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Only include title on the first message
---
lldb/include/l
https://github.com/kper updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124475
>From d44dd60bc7ae5deeed91fd9389b164e441164edc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Per
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:34:17 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Extended if conditions to support alias names for
registers
---
Jlalond wrote:
@clayborg
DAP with a detail and a total
Indeterminate with an increment detail
Then with an indete
https://github.com/oontvoo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127696
>From 24e9f78744f98ecf3ac01f1f719f1eac9b3479f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vy Nguyen
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:58:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [LLDB][Telemetry]Define DebuggerTelemetryInfo and related
metho
https://github.com/kper updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124475
>From d44dd60bc7ae5deeed91fd9389b164e441164edc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Per
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 17:34:17 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Extended if conditions to support alias names for
registers
---
@@ -68,10 +78,23 @@ def __call__(self, debugger, command, exe_ctx, result):
return
total = cmd_options.total
-progress = lldb.SBProgress("Progress tester", "Detail", total,
debugger)
+if total == -1:
+progress = lldb.SBProgress(
@@ -761,12 +767,29 @@ void Debugger::InstanceInitialize() {
DebuggerSP Debugger::CreateInstance(lldb::LogOutputCallback log_callback,
void *baton) {
+#ifdef LLVM_BUILD_TELEMETRY
+ lldb_private::telemetry::SteadyTimePoint start_time =
+
https://github.com/Jlalond updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124648
>From 12ff645735c1dbf51e58b9f80d4e3e13a0babdf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Lalonde
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:41:58 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Only include title on the first message
---
lldb/include/l
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127566
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/labath edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127661
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -564,9 +557,8 @@ class UnwindPlan {
}
private:
- typedef std::vector collection;
- collection m_row_list;
- AddressRange m_plan_valid_address_range;
+ std::map m_rows;
labath wrote:
It won't work, since the order of entries is important. What I can i
labath wrote:
> It's never the case on Darwin that you know nothing about a loaded shared
> library. You will always know at least its name, UUID, and load addresses. It
> doesn't matter whether the binary exists on disk or not, we will always be
> able to reconstruct at least a skeleton form
labath wrote:
> > * what about commands (I don't know if we have any) whose output consists
> > of more than formatting a single value (which, I guess would be lost if the
> > IDE decides to ignore the output). Are we fine with not supporting that?
> > (we could say that if a command wants to
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127717
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ def __init__(self, lit_config, config):
features.add("long_tests")
if target_triple:
+print(target_triple)
DavidSpickett wrote:
Remove this
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124475
_
https://github.com/DavidSpickett commented:
I'm somewhat professionally restricted from getting too involved in RISC-V ,as
much as I would like to see it actually work normally, just to save others
hassle.
But I can see this pretty obviously fixes the bug, so I don't have a problem
letting th
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124475
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -652,6 +652,153 @@ def haltReason(self):
)
self.match("register read s31", ["s31 = 128"])
+@skipIfXmlSupportMissing
+@skipIfRemote
+@skipIfLLVMTargetMissing("RISCV")
+def test_riscv64_regs(self):
+"""Test grabbing various riscv64 regi
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# REQUIRES: native && target-riscv64
+# RUN: %clangxx_host %p/Inputs/riscv64-gp-read.cpp -o %t
+# RUN: %lldb -b -s %s %t | FileCheck %s
+process launch
+
+register read --all
+# CHECK-DAG: x0 = 0x0
+# CHECK-DAG: x1 = 0x1
+# CHECK-DAG: x2 = 0x2
+# CHECK-DAG: x3 =
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124475
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett requested changes to this pull request.
Please add a test like `lldb/test/Shell/Register/aarch64-gp-read.test` which
tests the normal and alias names using a live process.
Note that the main "trick" of that test is to manually insert a breakpoint
instruction:
`
DavidSpickett wrote:
Everything in the PR at the moment is fine, just need the extra test case.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124059
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/l
@@ -56,13 +60,83 @@ struct LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo : public
llvm::telemetry::TelemetryInfo {
void serialize(llvm::telemetry::Serializer &serializer) const override;
};
+/// Describes the exit status of a debugger.
+struct ExitDescription {
+ int exit_code;
+ std::string des
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124475
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -73,6 +147,10 @@ class TelemetryManager : public llvm::telemetry::Manager {
private:
std::unique_ptr m_config;
+ // Each debugger is assigned a unique ID (session_id).
+ // All TelemetryInfo entries emitted for the same debugger instance
+ // will get the same session_
mizvekov wrote:
Cherry picking this onto the 20.x release branch requires
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125791 to be cherry-picked first.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126215
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llv
mizvekov wrote:
/cherry-pick 08bda1cc6b0d2f1d31a89a76b5c154a11086c420
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125791
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -56,13 +60,83 @@ struct LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo : public
llvm::telemetry::TelemetryInfo {
void serialize(llvm::telemetry::Serializer &serializer) const override;
};
+/// Describes the exit status of a debugger.
+struct ExitDescription {
+ int exit_code;
+ std::string des
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#127779
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125791
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -761,12 +767,29 @@ void Debugger::InstanceInitialize() {
DebuggerSP Debugger::CreateInstance(lldb::LogOutputCallback log_callback,
void *baton) {
+#ifdef LLVM_BUILD_TELEMETRY
+ lldb_private::telemetry::SteadyTimePoint start_time =
+
@@ -56,16 +54,107 @@ void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer
&serializer) const {
return UUID(random_bytes).GetAsString();
}
+void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer &serializer) const {
+ serializer.write("entry_kind", getKind());
+ serializer.write("se
@@ -56,16 +54,107 @@ void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer
&serializer) const {
return UUID(random_bytes).GetAsString();
}
+void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer &serializer) const {
+ serializer.write("entry_kind", getKind());
+ serializer.write("se
@@ -56,16 +54,107 @@ void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer
&serializer) const {
return UUID(random_bytes).GetAsString();
}
+void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer &serializer) const {
+ serializer.write("entry_kind", getKind());
+ serializer.write("se
@@ -56,16 +54,107 @@ void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer
&serializer) const {
return UUID(random_bytes).GetAsString();
}
+void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer &serializer) const {
+ serializer.write("entry_kind", getKind());
+ serializer.write("se
@@ -56,16 +54,107 @@ void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer
&serializer) const {
return UUID(random_bytes).GetAsString();
}
+void LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo::serialize(Serializer &serializer) const {
+ serializer.write("entry_kind", getKind());
+ serializer.write("se
labath wrote:
> Cherry picking this onto the 20.x release branch requires #125791 to be
> cherry-picked first.
But this is just a bugfix for that PR, right? (IOW, if there's no reason to
cherry-pick that PR, then there's also no reason cherry-pick this fix)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
@@ -493,36 +493,27 @@ class RangeDataVector {
#ifdef ASSERT_RANGEMAP_ARE_SORTED
assert(IsSorted());
#endif
-typename Collection::iterator pos;
-typename Collection::iterator end;
-typename Collection::iterator prev;
-bool can_combine = false;
-// First w
@@ -493,36 +493,27 @@ class RangeDataVector {
#ifdef ASSERT_RANGEMAP_ARE_SORTED
assert(IsSorted());
#endif
-typename Collection::iterator pos;
-typename Collection::iterator end;
-typename Collection::iterator prev;
-bool can_combine = false;
-// First w
https://github.com/labath updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127059
>From 450371c5fd3ecce3ec54237379fef751fba45751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Labath
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:08:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Fix
RangeDataVector::CombineConsecutiveEntriesWithEqua
@@ -493,36 +493,27 @@ class RangeDataVector {
#ifdef ASSERT_RANGEMAP_ARE_SORTED
assert(IsSorted());
#endif
-typename Collection::iterator pos;
-typename Collection::iterator end;
-typename Collection::iterator prev;
-bool can_combine = false;
-// First w
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
LineSeqeunce is basically a vector, except that users aren't supposed to know
that. This implements the same concept in a slightly simpler fashion.
---
Patch is 21.79 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full v
labath wrote:
Okay, nevermind me then. :) Thanks for the explanation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126215
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks for bearing with me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126630
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-comm
mizvekov wrote:
But there is reason to cherry-pick
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125791, as it fixes a regression
which would otherwise be introduced in 20.x.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126215
___
lldb-commits mailing list
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127800
LineSeqeunce is basically a vector, except that users aren't supposed to know
that. This implements the same concept in a slightly simpler fashion.
>From b82a233736efc391aaa408513cbea257871ab7b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127806
After (too) much deliberation, I came to the conclusion that this isn't the
right abstraction, as it doesn't behave completely like the standard
upper_bound method. What I really wanted was to get the range of l
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127799
I *think* this should be equivalent to the original implementation for all line
tables occurring in practice. One difference I'm aware of is that the original
implementation tried to return the first line entry
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
I *think* this should be equivalent to the original implementation for all line
tables occurring in practice. One difference I'm aware of is that the original
implementation tried to return the first line entr
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-02-19T12:58:55+01:00
New Revision: fadbc33b01d6815bf05d802d1323322262b54d42
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fadbc33b01d6815bf05d802d1323322262b54d42
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fadbc33b01d6815bf05d802d1323322262b54d42.diff
https://github.com/labath closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127519
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -2837,8 +2837,8 @@ void CommandInterpreter::HandleCommandsFromFile(
}
if (flags & eHandleCommandFlagPrintResult) {
-debugger.GetOutputFile().Printf("Executing commands in '%s'.\n",
-cmd_file_path.c_str());
+debugger.GetOutputF
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
LGTM. I am not saying that you have to do anything about this, but there are
two things that caught my eye:
- Debugger::GetOutputFileSP is now the biggest backdoor into our locking
mechanism. In a way, it's even worse than GetOutputStreamSP,
https://github.com/labath edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127682
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
After (too) much deliberation, I came to the conclusion that this isn't the
right abstraction, as it doesn't behave completely like the standard
upper_bound method. What I really wanted was to get the range of
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127829
This patch revives https://reviews.llvm.org/D78095 with some changes.
This patch uses the `DW_AT_decl_XXX` DWARF attributes to create
`clang::SourceLocation`s and attach them to the Clang decls that LLDB cre
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
This patch revives https://reviews.llvm.org/D78095 with some changes.
This patch uses the `DW_AT_decl_XXX` DWARF attributes to create
`clang::SourceLocation`s and attach them to the Clang decls that LLDB c
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127829
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127829
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127829
>From 1aabc8a93ffac06755cbaf5e6c1fa8913cd63729 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:47:30 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][TypeSystemClang] Create MainFileID for
TypeSystemC
jimingham wrote:
> > > * what about commands (I don't know if we have any) whose output consists
> > > of more than formatting a single value (which, I guess would be lost if
> > > the IDE decides to ignore the output). Are we fine with not supporting
> > > that? (we could say that if a comman
https://github.com/oontvoo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127834
None
>From 0d6a36d84df50ccb9eef9ef3dd6f59d4299edeac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vy Nguyen
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:47:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB][Telemetry]Define TargetInfo for collecting data about
https://github.com/oontvoo converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127834
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Vy Nguyen (oontvoo)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127834.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/include/lldb/Core/Telemetry.h (+84-2)
- (modified) lldb/source/Core/Telemetry.cpp (+86-13)
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 5ecce45ea2980aff35d1283d4dd3feb8f74de16c
0d6a36d84df50ccb9eef9ef3dd6f59d4299edeac --e
@@ -56,13 +60,83 @@ struct LLDBBaseTelemetryInfo : public
llvm::telemetry::TelemetryInfo {
void serialize(llvm::telemetry::Serializer &serializer) const override;
};
+/// Describes the exit status of a debugger.
+struct ExitDescription {
+ int exit_code;
+ std::string des
@@ -761,12 +767,29 @@ void Debugger::InstanceInitialize() {
DebuggerSP Debugger::CreateInstance(lldb::LogOutputCallback log_callback,
void *baton) {
+#ifdef LLVM_BUILD_TELEMETRY
+ lldb_private::telemetry::SteadyTimePoint start_time =
+
ajordanr-google wrote:
> Okay, I think I understand what's going on with fuchsia: they manually set
> CURSES_INCLUDE_DIRS, CURSES_LIBRARIES, and PANEL_LIBRARIES. On line 17 we go
> into the else-case because TINFO_LIBRARIES is not set.
That's correct!
> So next we check if the provided CURSES
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127829
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
87 matches
Mail list logo
