Robert Muir created LUCENE-10543:
Summary: Achieve contribution workflow perfection (with progress)
Key: LUCENE-10543
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529236#comment-17529236
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10543:
--
another idea is to use github wiki functio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529240#comment-17529240
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10543:
--
another idea, add a simple "fork me on git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529245#comment-17529245
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10543:
--
Believe it or not, there's actually no "li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529255#comment-17529255
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10543:
--
("with progress"... yeah, that's why LUCEN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529261#comment-17529261
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10541:
--
Filed a PR at https://github.com/apache/lu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529263#comment-17529263
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9871:
-
just a reminder, haven't forgot about java ve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529270#comment-17529270
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10543:
--
It was entirely too difficult to find the
uschindler commented on PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#issuecomment-877517
Maybe we should set the limit to the maximum term size. This would allow us
to test also longer terms.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529286#comment-17529286
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10541:
I think another option might be to use
uschindler commented on code in PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851#discussion_r860615393
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/mockfile/HandleLimitFS.java:
##
@@ -17,16 +17,38 @@
package org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile;
import java.i
uschindler commented on code in PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851#discussion_r860615990
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/mockfile/HandleLimitFS.java:
##
@@ -17,16 +17,38 @@
package org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile;
import java.i
dweiss commented on code in PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851#discussion_r860616950
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/mockfile/HandleLimitFS.java:
##
@@ -17,16 +17,38 @@
package org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile;
import java.io.IO
uschindler commented on code in PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851#discussion_r860618388
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/mockfile/HandleLimitFS.java:
##
@@ -17,16 +17,38 @@
package org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile;
import java.i
rmuir commented on code in PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851#discussion_r860619792
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/mockfile/HandleLimitFS.java:
##
@@ -17,16 +17,38 @@
package org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile;
import java.io.IOE
rmuir commented on code in PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851#discussion_r860621619
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/mockfile/HandleLimitFS.java:
##
@@ -17,16 +17,38 @@
package org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile;
import java.io.IOE
uschindler commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860622081
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit
uschindler commented on code in PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851#discussion_r860623990
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/mockfile/HandleLimitFS.java:
##
@@ -17,16 +17,38 @@
package org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile;
import java.i
dweiss commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860625375
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit the
rmuir commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860626938
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit the d
rmuir commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860628445
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit the d
rmuir commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860631960
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit the d
rmuir commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860635303
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit the d
dweiss commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860641028
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit the
mocobeta commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860642306
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit th
mocobeta commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860642306
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit th
uschindler commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r860657767
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit
uschindler commented on code in PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851#discussion_r860662889
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/mockfile/HandleLimitFS.java:
##
@@ -17,16 +17,38 @@
package org.apache.lucene.tests.mockfile;
import java.i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529333#comment-17529333
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10543:
bq. Creating a PR still requires signi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529343#comment-17529343
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10543:
I just found that it looks like {{chan
jpountz commented on code in PR #842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/842#discussion_r860789641
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldInfos.java:
##
@@ -350,6 +360,11 @@ static final class FieldNumbers {
this.omitNorms = new HashMap<>();
t
jpountz commented on PR #780:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/780#issuecomment-1112113792
If you can find an approach that is less intrusive, maybe I would
reconsider, but it still looks to me like we're adding complexity to work
around a bad user decisions, which doesn't feel li
wjp719 commented on PR #780:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/780#issuecomment-1112123414
@jpountz Ok, tanks. As users ofter need to search on both directions but
index data can only be index sorted by one directions. This situation may be
common for users.
> If you can fin
jpountz commented on PR #780:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/780#issuecomment-1112127776
Why do you sort the index if you need to sort in both directions? Is it for
range queries? Could you use points instead?
Sorry I don't have good ideas for making it less intrusive.
-
mocobeta commented on PR #846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/846#issuecomment-1112127870
@mikemccand thank you for revewing!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529416#comment-17529416
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10541:
-
{quote}enwiki lines contains
gsmiller commented on PR #848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/848#issuecomment-1112187182
@gautamworah96 thanks for looking! The mismatch in the original Jira was a
slightly different check, which is the one now set to a delta of `0`. The fix
proposed here is to ensure the float
gsmiller commented on code in PR #849:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/849#discussion_r860876168
##
lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/TestTaxonomyFacetAssociations.java:
##
@@ -142,6 +146,34 @@ public static void beforeClass() throws Exception {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529437#comment-17529437
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10543:
-
+1 to work out a migration p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529452#comment-17529452
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10543:
-
Also, I love this new "Achie
mikemccand commented on PR #663:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/663#issuecomment-1112261833
Thanks @spike-liu -- this looks great to me! I'll leave it open for at
least 48 hours to see if anyone else wants to approve/comment, else lazy
consensus kicks in!
--
This is an autom
Greg Miller created LUCENE-10544:
Summary: Should ExitableTermsEnum wrap postings and impacts?
Key: LUCENE-10544
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10544
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Miller updated LUCENE-10544:
-
Description:
While looking into options for LUCENE-10151, I noticed that
{{ExitableDirectoryRe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529470#comment-17529470
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10544:
---
I suspect that this is due to the fact t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529481#comment-17529481
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10544:
--
Thanks [~jpountz]. One issue with the coll
mocobeta commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r861028741
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit th
uschindler commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r861032318
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit
mocobeta commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r861050340
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529513#comment-17529513
]
Kevin Risden commented on LUCENE-10534:
---
I reviewed the jmh tests again and reali
dnhatn commented on code in PR #842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/842#discussion_r861098734
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldInfos.java:
##
@@ -350,6 +360,11 @@ static final class FieldNumbers {
this.omitNorms = new HashMap<>();
th
dnhatn commented on PR #842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/842#issuecomment-1112420113
@mayya-sharipova @jpountz Thanks for reviews.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
dnhatn merged PR #842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/842
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529522#comment-17529522
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10518:
--
Co
dnhatn opened a new pull request, #852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/852
This change relaxes the field consistency check for old indices as we
didn't enforce that in the previous versions. This commit also disables
the optimization that relies on the field consistency for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529572#comment-17529572
]
Kevin Risden commented on LUCENE-10534:
---
Updated metrics - there is a benefit to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Risden updated LUCENE-10542:
--
Description:
While looking at LUCENE-10534, found that *FieldSource exists implementation
af
dnhatn merged PR #852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/852
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529578#comment-17529578
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10518:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529580#comment-17529580
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10542:
--
Hi [~krisden], I think there might be more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nhat Nguyen resolved LUCENE-10518.
--
Fix Version/s: 9.1.1
9.2
Resolution: Fixed
> FieldInfos consistency
dweiss commented on code in PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#discussion_r861243269
##
lucene/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/analysis/MockTokenizer.java:
##
@@ -66,11 +67,11 @@ public class MockTokenizer extends Tokenizer {
* Limit the
dweiss merged PR #851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/851
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529603#comment-17529603
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10088:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529611#comment-17529611
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10088:
--
Co
dweiss commented on PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#issuecomment-1112594924
I ran nightly tests as well, they passed.
BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 24m 6s
832 actionable tasks: 480 executed, 352 up-to-date
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
gsmiller commented on PR #843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/843#issuecomment-1112602017
Thanks for all your thoughts @Yuti-G! I think I still disagree with changing
the current behavior. If we want to implement the contract of `getTopChildren`
properly, we'd need to sort by co
Yuti-G commented on PR #843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/843#issuecomment-1112633027
Hi @gsmiller, thanks for your feedback! Yes, I was proposing keeping the
existing behavior of getTopChildren but utilizing the top-n param, as I thought
it would safe because we would not bre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529668#comment-17529668
]
Chris M. Hostetter commented on LUCENE-10292:
-
{quote} I'm still not sure w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gautam Worah resolved LUCENE-9476.
--
Resolution: Fixed
The PR was merged into the Lucene 9 branch and released in version Lucene 9.
gautamworah96 opened a new pull request, #853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/853
Today, new contributors are usually unaware of where luceneutil benchmarks
are and when/how to run them. Committers usually end up pointing contributors
to the benchmarks package when they make per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529676#comment-17529676
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10292:
--
Co
vigyasharma commented on code in PR #848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/848#discussion_r861353455
##
lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/TestTaxonomyFacetAssociations.java:
##
@@ -500,10 +500,7 @@ private void validateFloats(
assertNull(fac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529677#comment-17529677
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10292:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529692#comment-17529692
]
Gautam Worah commented on LUCENE-10524:
---
I've submitted a pretty basic patch. It
mocobeta commented on PR #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/850#issuecomment-1112791650
I traced method calls of `BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(Random
random, Analyzer a, int iterations, int maxWordLength)` with larger values than
255 for `maxWordLength`.
Those mi
gsmiller commented on code in PR #848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/848#discussion_r861408137
##
lucene/facet/src/test/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/TestTaxonomyFacetAssociations.java:
##
@@ -500,10 +500,7 @@ private void validateFloats(
assertNull(facetR
gsmiller commented on PR #848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/848#issuecomment-1112794825
@vigyasharma yeah exactly. So the faceting implementation was summing the
doc values in a different order from the test case. I wish I could do something
similar for the overall aggregation
gsmiller commented on PR #843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/843#issuecomment-1112797399
> Are you suggesting that I add another getAllChildren API to retain the
current behavior of getTopChildren, and then fix getTopChildren by returning
ranges sorted by counts, or do you mean
mocobeta commented on PR #853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/853#issuecomment-1112798859
@gautamworah96 This looks good to me!
I wonder if it makes sense to mention the off-the-shelf
https://github.com/apache/lucene/tree/main/lucene/benchmark module here too (I
didn't find i
mocobeta merged PR #846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/846
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529710#comment-17529710
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10493:
--
Co
Yuti-G commented on PR #843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/843#issuecomment-1112806474
Thanks @gsmiller for confirming! I will create another Jira issue to propose
adding getAllChildren to Facets, and revisit this issue after getting feedback
from the community. Thanks again fo
Tomoko Uchida created LUCENE-10545:
--
Summary: Allow Github PR link in CHANGES.html
Key: LUCENE-10545
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10545
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type
mocobeta opened a new pull request, #854:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/854
changes2html already supports links to Github PRs, but the link is obsoleted
so a small modification is needed to make it work again.
With this change, developers can directly link to their pull reque
mocobeta commented on code in PR #854:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/854#discussion_r861431387
##
lucene/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Other
* LUCENE-10253: The @BadApple annotation has been removed from the test
framework. (Adrien Grand)
-* LUCENE-10393:
mocobeta commented on code in PR #854:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/854#discussion_r861432053
##
gradle/documentation/changes-to-html/changes2html.pl:
##
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@
$item =~ s{((LUCENE|SOLR|INFRA)\s+(\d{3,}))}
{$1}gi;
# Link
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomoko Uchida updated LUCENE-10545:
---
Description:
{{changes2html}} already supports links to Github PRs ([LUCENE-5383]), but the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomoko Uchida updated LUCENE-10545:
---
Description:
{{changes2html}} already supports links to Github PRs (LUCENE-5383), but the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529732#comment-17529732
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10545:
This PR shows a concrete example to sh
mocobeta commented on code in PR #854:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/854#discussion_r861437113
##
lucene/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Other
* LUCENE-10253: The @BadApple annotation has been removed from the test
framework. (Adrien Grand)
-* LUCENE-10393:
mocobeta commented on code in PR #854:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/854#discussion_r861437113
##
lucene/CHANGES.txt:
##
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Other
* LUCENE-10253: The @BadApple annotation has been removed from the test
framework. (Adrien Grand)
-* LUCENE-10393:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529735#comment-17529735
]
Tomoko Uchida edited comment on LUCENE-10543 at 4/29/22 3:21 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529735#comment-17529735
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10543:
I opened [LUCENE-10393] and a PR for i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529748#comment-17529748
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10545:
Note that this does not replace Jira i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17529735#comment-17529735
]
Tomoko Uchida edited comment on LUCENE-10543 at 4/29/22 6:36 AM:
95 matches
Mail list logo
