Sander Striker wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 18:49, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
First of all, we are in the process of deciding and clearly documenting
that only TLPs are to be incubated. Why? Because in Apache there are
only TLPs. Thus, Ruper is incubat
Adding the changes suggested by Sam.
Still need input from AltRMI and FTPServer.
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I believe that the Incubator Reorg RT has brought us to very interesting
conclusions, that I'd like to summarize here as a proposal, for which
I'd like to ask a vote after some discussion.
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Sander Striker wrote:
> > There was a discussion on the board list at the end of 2002. What was
> > basically the point was that every external codebase would come through
> > Incubator. No exceptions (for obvious reasons). IIRC the conclusion
> > was that no PMC was
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
There was a discussion on the board list at the end of 2002. What was
basically the point was that every external codebase would come through
Incubator. No exceptions (for obvious reasons). IIRC the conclusion
was that no P
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 08:36:20AM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>...
> > 3 - Code Audit Trail
> > =
> >
> > This proposal would make all PMC Chairs automatically members of the
> > Incubator, so that they can accept code donations to
Greg Stein wrote:
...
I'd suggest setting up cvs:committers/audits/ and putting the checklist in
there, maintained by the Incubator. Each PMC can then refer to it for
their work.
The Board can monitor what the PMCs are doing. If it looks like they're
taking in code that should have hit the Incubato
