Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ranjan.winner at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39051
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787
--- Comment #2 from martin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its
> documentation.
Hi Richard,
Sorry, can you kindly throw some more pointers over this.
Here is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787
--- Comment #3 from martin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its
> documentation.
Hi Richard,
Sorry, can you kindly throw some more pointers over this.
Here is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787
--- Comment #5 from martin ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2016, ranjan.winner at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787
> >
> > --- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72787
--- Comment #6 from martin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You can't rely on __builtin_object_size this way, please look up its
> documentation.
Hi Richard,
Are you pointing to this line of test-case :
size_t _sz =
