--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 19:02
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The gimplifier should not be emitting errors.
>
Why, exactly? Some diagnostics are impossible to emit early enough. Is this a
documented requirement? What's th
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 19:17
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Read the comments in PR 24222 but basicially the gimplifier is not should not
> being doing any semantic anlyasis, that is the job of the front-end.
>
Well, some of the s
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 04:55
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In addition to this, I'm not sure what exactly the standard requires say when
> firstprivate is used on a global var. The global var can be visible to the
> threads and t
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 15:15
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> without this we don't remap privatized global vars except directly in the
> omp context that privatized them.
>
But this is as it should be. We are only required to priva
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 14:57
---
Fixed. Also documented other missing passes.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 14:58
---
Subject: Bug 26242
Author: dnovillo
Date: Mon May 29 14:57:39 2006
New Revision: 114200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114200
Log:
PR 26242
* doc/passes.t
--- Comment #7 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 15:28
---
Subject: Bug 26242
Author: dnovillo
Date: Mon May 29 15:28:33 2006
New Revision: 114202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114202
Log:
PR 26242
* passes.t
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 15:52
---
Subject: Bug 26237
Author: dnovillo
Date: Mon May 29 15:52:51 2006
New Revision: 114204
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114204
Log:
PR 26237
* c-tree.texi: Documen
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 15:56
---
Fixed.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:03
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Diego, would you be able to put a pointer in the manual?
>
There are two references to the OpenMP API already. One in the documentation
of -fopenmp, the other with the documen
--- Comment #7 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-12 21:10
---
This is still an issue. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-06/msg00178.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-20 18:47
---
Subject: Bug 38178
Author: dnovillo
Date: Thu Nov 20 18:45:58 2008
New Revision: 142055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142055
Log:
2008-11-20 Rafael Espindola <[EMAI
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-31 19:32
---
Initial fix at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00953.html
Keeping open as thunks with varargs are still broken.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #25 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 15:23
---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Created an attachment (id=17107)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17107&action=view) [edit]
> Here is the updated patch.
OK.
Diego.
--
http:
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 22:10
---
The libelf included in Red Hat based distros is different than the one we used
to develop LTO. There was a thread on IRC recently where Jakub proposed a way
of working around this:
(16:27:18) jakub: dnovillo
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 23:00
---
No, of course not. This is by design. The lto1 binary is the front end for
GIMPLE, as with any other front end, it has to be specifically requested when
configuring the compiler. You have to add 'lto&#x
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 13:41
---
Additional information on the failure and a suggestion on a possible fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-01/msg00074.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 15:05
---
Subject: Bug 39004
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Jan 28 15:05:16 2009
New Revision: 143731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143731
Log:
PR middle-end/39004
* lto-funct
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 15:17
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg01367.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 21:08
---
This is the same issue reported in 39001, except that it happens on a different
file.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39001 ***
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-28 21:08
---
*** Bug 39011 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-31 18:49
---
Subject: Bug 39010
Author: dnovillo
Date: Sat Jan 31 18:49:10 2009
New Revision: 143828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143828
Log:
Revert
2009-01-30
--- Comment #6 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-31 18:51
---
The patch
2009-01-30 H.J. Lu
PR lto/39010
* lto-function-out.c (output_string): Properly handle the
trailing '\0'.
(output_
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-14 21:41
---
This is likely fixed by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg00819.html,
could you try again?
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dnovillo at redhat dot com |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 14:19
---
testing fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24670
--- Comment #17 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 19:56
---
Subject: Bug 24627
Author: dnovillo
Date: Fri Nov 4 19:56:28 2005
New Revision: 106502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106502
Log:
PR 24627
* tree-ssa-dce.c (
--- Comment #18 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 19:57
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00239.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 14:51
---
Subject: Bug 24670
Author: dnovillo
Date: Sun Nov 6 14:51:16 2005
New Revision: 106562
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106562
Log:
PR 24670
* tr
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 14:56
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00405.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 19:06
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00458.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 21:09
---
Subject: Bug 23046
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Nov 8 21:09:51 2005
New Revision: 106656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106656
Log:
2005-11-08 James A. Morrison <[EMAI
--- Comment #22 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 21:16
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00539.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 01:04
---
Will take a look shortly.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-12 17:47
---
Testing new patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24703
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 01:25
---
Subject: Bug 24703
Author: dnovillo
Date: Mon Nov 14 01:24:54 2005
New Revision: 106878
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106878
Log:
PR 24703
* o
--- Comment #9 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 19:50
---
Working on it.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 02:59
---
Subject: Bug 24840
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Nov 15 02:59:03 2005
New Revision: 106930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106930
Log:
PR 24840
* tr
--- Comment #11 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 03:01
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg01042.html.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 21:50
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Will take a look shortly.
>
I stand by my analysis in #5. The Fortran FE is lying to the middle end.
There is no field 'ktbuf' in this structure.
--
dnovillo at
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 15:56
---
Fixed.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 15:57
---
Working on this.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 15:18
---
Subject: Bug 24849
Author: dnovillo
Date: Sat Nov 19 15:18:08 2005
New Revision: 107220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107220
Log:
PR 24849
* o
--- Comment #7 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 15:18
---
Workaround applied.
The actual solution separates lowering from optimization, once all the OMP
directives are lowered to a language-independent form, we can apply the
combined parallel+loop optimization without
--- Comment #21 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-05 14:40
---
(In reply to comment #20)
> This is a showstopper.
>
I'm reviewing bonzini's patch today.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23948
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 18:23
---
Fixed with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01192.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 13:25
---
Testing patch. The bug was in the alias pruning code. We need to handle
.GLOBAL_VAR in access_can_touch_variable. A memory reference that uses a
call-clobbered memory tag should always be considered to touch
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 17:28
---
Subject: Bug 28410
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Jul 18 17:27:57 2006
New Revision: 115564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115564
Log:
PR 28410
* tree-ssa-op
--- Comment #6 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 17:29
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg00786.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-28 18:32
---
Excerpts from IRC session with jakub discussing this:
13:28 1grow ();
13:28 2node = pool;
13:28 3D.1928 = node->next;
13:28 4pool = D.1928;
13:28 5foo = (str
--- Comment #39 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 12:54
---
(In reply to comment #38)
> The name, and all the documentation, which say they cannot be
> addressed, which means they cannot be pointed to by any pointer, which
> means they are unaliased.
>
Abs
--- Comment #8 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 15:49
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Is this now being looked into by Diego or Aldy?
>
It wasn't. It is now.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:48
---
Testing alternate patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30562
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-07 23:33
---
I cannot reproduce this bug with mainline as of 2007-02-06. The bug is still
latent though, so I will commit a variant of this patch to fix it.
Essentially, we should leave every TREE_ADDRESSABLE variable alone
--- Comment #6 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-08 16:56
---
Subject: Bug 30562
Author: dnovillo
Date: Thu Feb 8 16:55:43 2007
New Revision: 121715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121715
Log:
PR 30562
* tree-flow.h (struct v
--- Comment #7 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-08 17:10
---
Fix http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00727.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30562
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 00:59
---
I have now reproduced this locally and I'm working on a fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30735
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30791
--- Comment #11 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 23:54
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Diego, is this something that you might be able to help with?
>
Sure.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #23 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 12:35
---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Frankly, I think it would make sense to remove completely this XFAIL-ing mess
> and just wait for Diego to fix the compiler issue.
>
Agreed. I don't understand why the r
--- Comment #6 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-04 18:37
---
I've just reproduced these failures locally. Two options:
1- The Ada FE is somehow tricking alias analysis into thinking that some
call-clobbered symbols are not call-clobbered.
2- Alias analysis i
--- Comment #8 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-04 19:04
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> If you have a run directory:
> cd gcc/testsuite/ada/acats/tests/c4/c41307d
> gdb .../gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.3.0/gnat1
> r -I../../../support -quiet -dumpbase c41
--- Comment #7 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-06 12:55
---
Might as well take this one too.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 23:53
---
I'm already handling this family of performance problems. I need a few more
days to finish the WIP patch I have. In the meantime, see if increasing
--param max-aliased-vops works around the pr
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|dnovillo at redhat dot com |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc
--- Comment #13 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 19:55
---
I can't reproduce this on mainline anymore. It does fail on the 4.2 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29585
--- Comment #14 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 19:22
---
Subject: Bug 29585
Author: dnovillo
Date: Sat Mar 31 19:21:46 2007
New Revision: 123386
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123386
Log:
2007-03-31 Diego Novillo <[EMAI
--- Comment #15 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 19:28
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg02059.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-05 12:49
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> So, why does SSA pass have to interfere with computation dataflow? This
> interferece makes things worse and effectively takes away user's control on
> the
> flow
--- Comment #14 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-11 17:14
---
Subject: Bug 31090
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Apr 11 17:14:06 2007
New Revision: 123719
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123719
Log:
PR 30735
PR 31090
--- Comment #6 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-11 17:14
---
Subject: Bug 30735
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Apr 11 17:14:06 2007
New Revision: 123719
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123719
Log:
PR 30735
PR 31090
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-12 00:28
---
Hmm, I may have triggered this one with the fix for 30735. I had inadvertently
tested with checking disabled. Will take a look.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 13:12
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00174.html.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-03 13:08
---
Subject: Bug 31521
Author: dnovillo
Date: Fri Aug 3 13:08:29 2007
New Revision: 127180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127180
Log:
2007-08-03 Andrew Pinski <[EMAI
--- Comment #15 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-16 15:22
---
If not an exact duplicate, it's strongly related to 18501. The code pattern is
slightly different so it may be worth keeping around. Adding a dependency on
18501.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org ch
wrap around
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33099
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-30 16:00
---
Subject: Bug 33593
Author: dnovillo
Date: Sun Sep 30 16:00:36 2007
New Revision: 128893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128893
Log:
PR 33593
* tree-s
hen comparing enums
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:21 ---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00943.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 18706 depends on bug 19865, which changed state.
Bug 19865 Summary: [4.0 Regression] ice / gnat bug detected.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19865
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18
21:44 ---
Fix. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01074.html.
The patch allows VRP to eliminate 42% more conditionals on cc1-i-files and 173%
more conditionals on DLV. But produces little difference in
--
Bug 19659 depends on bug 18178, which changed state.
Bug 18178 Summary: Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18178
What|Old Value |New Value
--
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22
18:26 ---
Testing patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20115
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25
13:31 ---
Could you show me how to configure a cris-axis-elf target and build a
simulator?
Have you tried undoing the tree-into-ssa.c change? It should be easy with:
$ cvs up -r 2.40 tree-into-ssa.c
If there
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25
15:04 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> if (lhs && (TREE_CODE (lhs) == TREE_LIST || EXPR_P (lhs))
> will works for everyone, it works for this testcase too but I have not
> bootstrapped or tested
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25
16:48 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I've confirmed on this other machine that the update caused the same breakage.
>
Ah, yes. I see it now. The reorg tickled a bug in the renamer:
# n_21 = V_MUST
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25
21:18 ---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01625.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Severity|normal
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02
15:28 ---
Pasting IRC dialogue to avoid forgetting what this was all about:
dnovillo: i had a patch to make CCP look in initializers for
structures, but rth and you rejected it, claiming it should not be done in
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
Version|3.4.2
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-04
18:01 ---
Adding some of the early analysis that went on in private mail.
> So is there an __attribute__ that we can use to mark that function to
> always return non-NULL, so the compiler knows that path
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-16
12:08 ---
Thanks Kazu. I've fixed this one already in my local tree. Will probably
commit the fix in the next few days.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08
21:49 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Ugh. The copy we inserted turned out to be totally useless for determining
> that the condition at the end of BB5 is always false. Argggh.
>
> To make this sche
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
