https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120882
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120884
Bug ID: 120884
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at
cp/pt.cc:14029 since 14.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119100
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul-Antoine Arras :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e24814d9e09019bf42b33b66827648ceff6e7c0
commit r16-1777-g6e24814d9e09019bf42b33b66827648ceff6e7c0
Author: Paul-Antoine Arras
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120881
Bug ID: 120881
Summary: [16 Regression] -fstack-protector-all -pg doesn't call
mount at function entry
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120880
Bug ID: 120880
Summary: g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault since
10.1 only with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120885
Bug ID: 120885
Summary: SLP build does not consider operand swapping for
conditional commutative operators
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120886
Bug ID: 120886
Summary: SLP build does not consider operand swapping for
commutative builtin functions
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120889
Bug ID: 120889
Summary: [16 regression]
gfortran.dg/asan/array_constructor_1.f90 Fails since
r16-1696-gdff66a690f6d47
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120888
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|promotion of unsigned char |[16 regression] promotion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120890
Bug ID: 120890
Summary: virtual destructor on base class variable does not
call derived class destructor when using [] destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UN
xplorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20250630/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
--enable-multiarch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120890
--- Comment #1 from De Rycke, Dirk ---
// the simple example
#include
#include
class vBaseClass
{
public:
vBaseClass ()
{
printf ("Construct %s\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
}
virtual ~ vBaseClass ()
{
printf ("Destruct %s\n",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120889
--- Comment #1 from Andre Vehreschild ---
I'll have a look as soon as I finish the work for aarch64-freebsd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120520
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e33409a83251d057eb03b22e8f95f3ad7bf822e1
commit r16-1775-ge33409a83251d057eb03b22e8f95f3ad7bf822e1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120875
Bug ID: 120875
Summary: internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.cc:25494
since 11.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120876
Bug ID: 120876
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
finish_id_expression
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117023
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e33409a83251d057eb03b22e8f95f3ad7bf822e1
commit r16-1775-ge33409a83251d057eb03b22e8f95f3ad7bf822e1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120877
Bug ID: 120877
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault since 10.1
with std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118094
Bug 118094 depends on bug 120520, which changed state.
Bug 120520 Summary: [C2y] Implement N3466, Clarifications on null pointers in
the library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120520
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120520
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106113
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guillaume.piolat at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120878
Bug ID: 120878
Summary: ICE: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/constexpr.cc:1791
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120887
Bug ID: 120887
Summary: internal compiler error: in
type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.cc:29376 since
12.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120888
Bug ID: 120888
Summary: promotion of unsigned char and short function
arguments sign extends them since
gcc-16-170-ga670ebde3995
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120888
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Sam James -
(
[](auto&&... a) {
decltype(auto) l = {a...};
return l;
},
std::make_tuple(1, 2.3, '4')
);
return 0;
}
```
Stack dump:
```
In file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20250630/include/c++/16.0.0/tuple:43,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120881
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lili.cui at intel dot com
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120881
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120817
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #8)
> C testcase
>
> typedef struct {
> int _M_current;
> } __normal_iterator;
>
> typedef struct {
> char _M_elems[5];
> } array_5;
>
> __normal_iterat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120882
Bug ID: 120882
Summary: internal compiler error in
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20250630/include/c++/
16.0.0/concepts since 11.1 only with -std=c++23, with
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
Neal Frager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61760|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96570
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> I have posted a prototype at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/687651.html
Discussion shows a more general approach with a
__attribute__(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120879
Bug ID: 120879
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree_vec, have
identifier_node in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.cc:15757
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120733
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da3f2a561649c7c4899449c6b3ab2b6d67792a71
commit r16-1774-gda3f2a561649c7c4899449c6b3ab2b6d67792a71
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120859
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
--- Comment #21 from Neal Frager ---
Created attachment 61761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61761&action=edit
test case for microblaze atomic test and set support
Attached is a test case for verifying the atomic test and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
--- Comment #20 from Neal Frager ---
Created attachment 61760
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61760&action=edit
microblaze atomic test and set patch
Attached is a proposal for adding atomic test and set support to the micro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118280
--- Comment #22 from Neal Frager ---
Hello everyone,
Could we ask for a review / request for comment of the attached patch which
will enable atomic test and set support for microblaze? Please note that this
solution requires the -mxl-barrel-sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120874
Bug ID: 120874
Summary: internal compiler error: in
type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.cc:29442 since
7.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120733
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120873
Bug ID: 120873
Summary: internal compiler error: error reporting routines
re-entered. since 11.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120890
--- Comment #2 from De Rycke, Dirk ---
Compilation optimization options are irrelevant.
Just compile with g++ and run the output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120659
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8cb537fdbdbc9e1c77ec389bcb99ad87b15cb92
commit r16-1779-gc8cb537fdbdbc9e1c77ec389bcb99ad87b15cb92
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Tue Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120843
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-30
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120884
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Can you please help and at least fill in the ice-on-invalid or ice-on-invalid
keywords yourself? Or are you not knowing whether you are fuzzing a valid or
invalid testcase? You are putting quite a load on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120890
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
See https://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/array-derived-vs-base.html also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120865
Benjamin Schulz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61751|mein_omp.cpp|main_omp.cpp
description|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120865
--- Comment #7 from Benjamin Schulz ---
the correct output is now this one without -O
The internal compiler error is at all o levels, -O1, O2, O3..
Interestingly -ffast-math works and leads to a considerable speed-up.
Just using -fno-math-err
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120847
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120892
Bug ID: 120892
Summary: Missed unrolling at -O3 due to split-paths
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120650
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120890
--- Comment #4 from De Rycke, Dirk ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> I am 99% sure the behavior here is correct as you can't delete an array of
> derivedClass via a pointer of vBaseClass. It will always delete an array of
> vBase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109116
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by kishan parmar :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69a2c243dd2cf9f77150c0eb86dfbc0931876bc1
commit r16-1782-g69a2c243dd2cf9f77150c0eb86dfbc0931876bc1
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120893
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-30
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120893
Bug ID: 120893
Summary: SLP costing costs vec_construct while forwprop turns
it into vec_permute
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120650
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53d2ca1541b34bb2f840d5aede9b826025dd0bb7
commit r15-9876-g53d2ca1541b34bb2f840d5aede9b826025dd0bb7
Author: Tomasz KamiÅs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114611
--- Comment #2 from Walter Spector ---
Revisiting this, I still think that by the definition of the default -std=gnu,
the compiler should give a warning by default, and give an error when -std=f95
(or higher) is specified.
Currently no warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |ipa
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 120714, which changed state.
Bug 120714 Summary: RISC-V: incorrect frame pointer CFA address for stack-clash
protection loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120714
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120714
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120714
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45a17e3081120f51f8e8b1d7cda73c7d89453e85
commit r16-1834-g45a17e3081120f51f8e8b1d7cda73c7d89453e85
Author: Alexey Merzlyakov
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119944
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120714
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120659
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 120659, which changed state.
Bug 120659 Summary: ICE: in riscv_sched_variable_issue, at
config/riscv/riscv.cc:9879 with -O2 -mcpu=sifive-x280
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120659
What|Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120650
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120895
--- Comment #1 from David C. Partridge
---
This also applies to arm64 / Neon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120895
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David C. Partridge from comment #1)
> This also applies to arm64 / Neon
Do you have an example there because I think the problems are 2 different
issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120890
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 99% sure the behavior here is correct as you can't delete an array of
derivedClass via a pointer of vBaseClass. It will always delete an array of
vBaseClass.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120714
Raphael M Zinsly changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rzinsly at ventanamicro dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120895
--- Comment #3 from David C. Partridge
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to David C. Partridge from comment #1)
> > This also applies to arm64 / Neon
>
> Do you have an example there because I think the problems are 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120894
Bug ID: 120894
Summary: Usage of std::pmr::polymorphic_allocator is not
optimized out
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120106
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8d33869fda464b4582ebdff3ea3c720f23276b0
commit r16-1828-gb8d33869fda464b4582ebdff3ea3c720f23276b0
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120893
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I thought I had saw another place which had asked a similar question about this
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120896
Bug ID: 120896
Summary: __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ incorrect behavior (depends on
instanciation order)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120895
Bug ID: 120895
Summary: AVX data types default alignment is not correct
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120888
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61763|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120897
Bug ID: 120897
Summary: __aeabi_d2h/__aeabi_d2h_alt function not implemented
in libgcc
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kelbonage at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120896
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120888
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target|xtensa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113524
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120627
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 120627 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114611
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have not had much time to finish this one. I will try to get to it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41155992d572030f7918682b2642365ada1f4fbf
commit r16-1835-g41155992d572030f7918682b2642365ada1f4fbf
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Jun 30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120627
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41155992d572030f7918682b2642365ada1f4fbf
commit r16-1835-g41155992d572030f7918682b2642365ada1f4fbf
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Jun 30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120813
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41155992d572030f7918682b2642365ada1f4fbf
commit r16-1835-g41155992d572030f7918682b2642365ada1f4fbf
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Jun 30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120736
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41155992d572030f7918682b2642365ada1f4fbf
commit r16-1835-g41155992d572030f7918682b2642365ada1f4fbf
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Jun 30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120898
Bug ID: 120898
Summary: ICE at -O2 calling function with old-style definition
taking a VLA parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120888
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 61769
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61769&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120779
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by James K. Lowden :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:612c4c104ac0c2726d2de27f350040ad5f8d5776
commit r16-1836-g612c4c104ac0c2726d2de27f350040ad5f8d5776
Author: James K. Lowden
Date:
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
