https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120219
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120226
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 120226, which changed state.
Bug 120226 Summary: 8% regression of exchange2 with -O2 between
g:d0571638a6bad932 and g:9b13bea07706a7ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120226
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120219
--- Comment #4 from Filip Kastl ---
*** Bug 120226 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119667
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4589ccbed5cad42296d4d1810b61e8dec0dadf79
commit r16-540-g4589ccbed5cad42296d4d1810b61e8dec0dadf79
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4589ccbed5cad42296d4d1810b61e8dec0dadf79
commit r16-540-g4589ccbed5cad42296d4d1810b61e8dec0dadf79
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120170
Bug 120170 depends on bug 65909, which changed state.
Bug 65909 Summary: check_v3_target_namedlocale blows up on targets that don't
support command-line arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|2025-05-11 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120222
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120222
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e64e894006eb4d82e0a80a386cf1d1714498e161
commit r16-536-ge64e894006eb4d82e0a80a386cf1d1714498e161
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e2b83faeb6b14254641933525e63171e89d973f
commit r16-537-g3e2b83faeb6b14254641933525e63171e89d973f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31cbac3037b7811bd0df63f4a09aa981b250c4bf
commit r16-539-g31cbac3037b7811bd0df63f4a09aa981b250c4bf
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120219
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 Regression] ~11%|[16 Regression] ~11%
|s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120227
--- Comment #1 from Iouri Kharon ---
FYI: The problem is in the compiler (cc1/cc1plus)- with such a combination of
keys, a "mixture" of codeview-style and dwarf-style info gets into the
generated assembler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a341d96add049e1ebc94e7350ff59e82b03043d2
commit r15-9658-ga341d96add049e1ebc94e7350ff59e82b03043d2
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120231
Bug ID: 120231
Summary: GCC fails to notice that (double)u64 is non-negative
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120050
--- Comment #9 from Xi Ruoyao ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/683277.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120179
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120231
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93788
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120235
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120219
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||119902
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120235
Bug ID: 120235
Summary: std::fabs(const std::complex&) should not be
defined
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120235
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Aha, it was present in a C++0x draft but removed by
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue595
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120169
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Reduced test case:
typedef void *decl_node;
bool decl_isRecordField(decl_node);
void decl_lookupSym(int);
void mcDebug_assert(bool);
typedef enum { decl_varient } decl_nodeT;
typedef struct decl_nodeRec_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120179
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #8)
> > * gfortran.dg/do_concurrent_basic.f90: Extend testcase.
>
> I noticed this removed execution and torture testing; maybe unintentionally?
I thin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120169
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120240
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120231
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, I'd definitely appreciate blank handlers for those, which I can gradually
try to implement. Working now on big-endian _BitInt, so it won't be
immediately, but will try to get to it before summer.
Hi,
We provide custom packaging boxes and labels. We make boxes in different
materials and styles such as Vape Boxe, Cigarette Boxes, Cartridge Boxes,
Cardboard boxes, Rigid Boxes and Mailer boxes, etc.
Our benefits include quick turnaround time, free shipping and design
support. Just send over y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4b4dfbd22e06877052bd4cc4b191d9d138155cf
commit r16-570-gb4b4dfbd22e06877052bd4cc4b191d9d138155cf
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54240
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #11)
> My guess is that cmov_optab should probably be removed as unused.
I filed PR 120230 for that and submitted a patch for the removal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120230
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/683366.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242
Bug ID: 120242
Summary: [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23]
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Summary|[15/16 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120179
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #8)
> (In reply to GCC Commits from comment #5)
> > commit r16-480-g6ce73ad4370c143a7d1e6a13b1d353db5884213f
>
> > * gfortran.dg/do_concurre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ce4c801e8275fcf0336ae2fb548f6ebb3ca068b
commit r16-567-g9ce4c801e8275fcf0336ae2fb548f6ebb3ca068b
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120231
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
We do not have cast operators between int and float. We are also missing some
dispatch code for them as we haven't actually used some of those patterns yet.
I am going to checked in a patch to trunk short
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120012
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9e3181516f1c0786f81b9c813581bf986a6300a
commit r15-9664-gc9e3181516f1c0786f81b9c813581bf986a6300a
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120187
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:506cb05479ee04c724eb0ebde07d2e9062efb264
commit r15-9666-g506cb05479ee04c724eb0ebde07d2e9062efb264
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120198
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d06a800159df2057d8d2fc028a3a90af937d606d
commit r15-9665-gd06a800159df2057d8d2fc028a3a90af937d606d
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120187
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120235
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
Palmer Dabbelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119986
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a0e88c0c329ee69b13cdf2784c0c88edbca1f9e
commit r14-11765-g4a0e88c0c329ee69b13cdf2784c0c88edbca1f9e
Author: Harald Anlauf
/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250512 (experimental) (GCC)
[508] %
[508] % gcctk -O3 small.c; ./a.out
[509] %
[509] % gcct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120198
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bdd2753f5f021a15a6c4ef02565356985fea1300
commit r16-556-gbdd2753f5f021a15a6c4ef02565356985fea1300
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120187
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af062510f4179aa7b13e632f77593deee8fe29f2
commit r16-558-gaf062510f4179aa7b13e632f77593deee8fe29f2
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120237
Bug ID: 120237
Summary: /pub/gcc/infrastructure/ +
contrib/download_prerequisites: Update MPFR for C23 /
Fortran 2023 functions
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91bc8169edd9038d78f38bd813287d72e6345c26
commit r16-559-g91bc8169edd9038d78f38bd813287d72e6345c26
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120238
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
This looks like a frontend issue to me,the CTOR {&e, 0} has 'e' without
TREE_ADDESSABLE set.
We used to paper over such FE issues during gimplification and wherenot, but
not so any longer.
Note that we _d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119692
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5f48e7872db30b8f174cb2c497868a358bf75d6
commit r16-566-gb5f48e7872db30b8f174cb2c497868a358bf75d6
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116445
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20c25919132b497c3a46a4bc4044f65b6459b99e
commit r16-562-g20c25919132b497c3a46a4bc4044f65b6459b99e
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119645
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1321df5bc05663021313c17f4af54b950aa05d01
commit r16-563-g1321df5bc05663021313c17f4af54b950aa05d01
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120223
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Dumb mistake on my part. Testing a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119427
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ff3b3122adfe0c479901da4fc28e367d89f185b
commit r15-9659-g0ff3b3122adfe0c479901da4fc28e367d89f185b
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b76b58a5875d519f95a5af661fb64e42a42ed8e
commit r15-9660-g0b76b58a5875d519f95a5af661fb64e42a42ed8e
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b76b58a5875d519f95a5af661fb64e42a42ed8e
commit r15-9660-g0b76b58a5875d519f95a5af661fb64e42a42ed8e
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119714
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119645
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Reproducer on Compiler Explorer (with gcc trunk):
https://godbolt.org/z/darnMzMr3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120222
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5)
> > You might try building with old reload.
>
> Can do that later.
Building the same revision with reload works fine, so this issue is re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119986
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120230
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120230
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:213c64962d24fa8a4b2f3d7a9c5508f9daed9fa2
commit r16-572-g213c64962d24fa8a4b2f3d7a9c5508f9daed9fa2
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
--- Comment #11 from Robert Dubner ---
I am not surprised. When I first read about it a couple of days ago, it looked
to me like two separate problems.
Primus: We talked casually about my working with you to duplicate the working
environment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118411
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d961c62a7bc1521c977fe48d4cbd940d7ccb8ea
commit r13-9651-g1d961c62a7bc1521c977fe48d4cbd940d7ccb8ea
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118411
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:102e10f0221150218e7ee61b47e42b50653052ae
commit r14-11766-g102e10f0221150218e7ee61b47e42b50653052ae
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118411
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41366ba6f6358fe6a3e9f631e513dffe2ea9db3a
commit r12-11095-g41366ba6f6358fe6a3e9f631e513dffe2ea9db3a
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21231
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> cmov optab is unused (PR120230).
> Which means this is fixed for GCC 4.5.0.
> I am testing a patch to remove cmov optab right now too.
cmov was removed in r16-57
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120142
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118411
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.4.1, 13.3.1, 14.2.1
Target Milesto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61409
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61409&action=edit
declarative_1.cob show output
(In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #11)
```
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #9 from Palmer Dabbelt ---
Which means we just need something like this?
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 38f3ae7cd84..5ed6c54ff1c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120231
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f375445ef09d5c97d5bcc0fcb6069612217963e
commit r16-571-g6f375445ef09d5c97d5bcc0fcb6069612217963e
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
A similar example but with an initially suspended coroutine terminates at -O2
or highter.
#include
struct coro {
struct promise_type {
promise_type() = default;
std::suspend_always initial_susp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243
Bug ID: 120243
Summary: [15/16 Regression] Exception rethrown from coroutine
promise type unhandled_exception not caught under -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120244
Bug ID: 120244
Summary: cobol.dg/cgroup2: more Valgrind issues in tests
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120245
Bug ID: 120245
Summary: RISC-V: Avoid FRM read/writes in non FRM related code
paths
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120245
--- Comment #1 from Vineet Gupta ---
Or maybe instead of tracking the backup reg, track the FRM itself.
It seems to be a hard reg so live tracking is easier.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111415
stephematician changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stephematician.acct@proton.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4ccad8faf5266248993f7896b000ccf871ded30
commit r16-579-ge4ccad8faf5266248993f7896b000ccf871ded30
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61411
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61411&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
void *f(void *a) { return __builtin_assoc_barrier(a); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120246
Bug ID: 120246
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected class type, have exceptional
(error_mark) in fold_const_call_1, at
fold-const-call.cc:1569
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61412
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61412&action=edit
Patch which I am testing for this
This patch just fixes pointer types.
The others will be fixed seperately bec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120069
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
In some graphs we are now better than before, mostly due to the inlining
change g:064cac730f88dc71c6da578f9ae5b8e092ab6cd4
which enables inlining on non-hot edges if callee speeds up enoug.
This improved imagi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213
--- Comment #9 from Raffaello Bertini ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #8)
> I'm not sure I fully grok the example code, but FWIW the analyzer doesn't
> yet "know" about the behavior of strnlen and so conservatively assumes any
> poss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin ---
I don't think I've ever done a LRA build with selftests enabled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113152
--- Comment #20 from Tobias Burnus ---
And for the condition, I think the proper way is to write:
#if MPFR_VERSION >= MPFR_VERSION_NUM(4,2,0)
... = mpfr_sinpi ( ... )
#else
fallback
#endif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
--- Comment #15 from Robert Dubner ---
Oh. Well, that's a comedown.
I am compiling GCC-16 on an Ubuntu 22.04 LTS system, with the Ubuntu
distribution version of GCC-11. When I build GCC-6 and run "make check-cobol"
I am getting, as of today,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377
--- Comment #16 from Robert Dubner ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10)
> (In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #9)
> > Whether or not this will fix any other problems, I don't know. I do know
> > that valgrind was reporting uniniti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120248
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rundongyang22 at m dot
fudan.edu.c
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
