https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89213
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116997
--- Comment #1 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Had a look at this and I see similar codegen for aarch64 when compiling for
big-endian.
If I disable tree-ifcvt (-fdisable-tree-ifvt) I end up with:
MEM [(void *)Ptr.0_1] = 30071062528;
Which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117003
Bug ID: 117003
Summary: pr104783.c is miscompiled with offloading and results
in segmentation fault during host-only execution for
-O1 and above
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116997
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #25 from Julian Waters ---
Created attachment 59290
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59290&action=edit
Newer patch for TLS support, incomplete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116997
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-January/537612.html
I can't remember if the fix was committed or not ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002
Bug ID: 117002
Summary: lifetime.d: In function ‘_d_newclassT’: error: size of
array element is not a multiple of its alignment with
-Warray-bounds and -O2
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116735
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a17e6d03c6ed53e3b2dfd2c3ff9b1066ffa97b9
commit r15-4122-g9a17e6d03c6ed53e3b2dfd2c3ff9b1066ffa97b9
Author: qing zhao
Date: Mon Sep 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117002
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-07
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2abd04d01bc4e18158c785e75c91576b836f3ba6
commit r15-4113-g2abd04d01bc4e18158c785e75c91576b836f3ba6
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1048ebbbdc98a5928a974356d7f4244603b6bd32
commit r15-4110-g1048ebbbdc98a5928a974356d7f4244603b6bd32
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1732298d51028ae50a802e538df5d7249556255d
commit r15-4112-g1732298d51028ae50a802e538df5d7249556255d
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8157f3f2d211bfbf53fbf8dd209b47ce583f4142
commit r15-4114-g8157f3f2d211bfbf53fbf8dd209b47ce583f4142
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03299164830e19405b35a5fa862e248df4ea01e2
commit r15-4115-g03299164830e19405b35a5fa862e248df4ea01e2
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116735
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|AS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114964
Ken Burtch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116983
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Plus the useless pointer conversions in GIMPLE can mean that
void *foo (int);
struct counted {
int counter;
int array[] __attribute__((counted_by(counter)));
};
struct notcounted {
int counter;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117004
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think there is a dup of this one around.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
Bug ID: 117008
Summary: -march=native pessimization of 25% with bitset
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117009
Bug ID: 117009
Summary: Wall should be in common.opt rather than the language
specific .opt
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117009
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-10-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you provide the output of invoking g++ with -march=native and when
compiling?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116996
Bug ID: 116996
Summary: Missed Detection of Null Pointer Dereference Issues
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116995
Bug ID: 116995
Summary: Missed Detection of Null Pointer Dereference Issues
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116998
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-testcase
--- Comment #1 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> x86:
>
> /app/example.cpp:6:1: note: Cost model analysis for part in loop 0:
> Vector cost: 172
> Scalar cost: 184
>
>
>
> aarch64:
> /app/example.cpp:6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113958
Nikolas Klauser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nikolasklauser at berlin dot de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116996
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116995
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 116996 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116855
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 6 Oct 2024, fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116855
>
> --- Comment #5 from Feng Xue ---
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116934
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116683
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116683
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7faadb1f261c6b8ef988c400c39ec7df09839dbe
commit r15-4106-g7faadb1f261c6b8ef988c400c39ec7df09839dbe
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Thu S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116998
Bug ID: 116998
Summary: [15 Regression] 5% slowdown of 400.perlbench on AMD
Zen3/4 since r15-3986-g3e1bd6470e4deb
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116999
Bug ID: 116999
Summary: Fold SVE whilelt/le comparisons with max int value to
ptrue
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116998
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116999
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is inspired by the LLVM PR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116896
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37554bacfd38b1466278b529d9e70a44d7b1b909
commit r15-4105-g37554bacfd38b1466278b529d9e70a44d7b1b909
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4d2f51741bbb1771219fbeaaf812fa73c36fc0f
commit r12-10747-gc4d2f51741bbb1771219fbeaaf812fa73c36fc0f
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116641
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ab55da5eba0aa7a92e15d8100d51cc977f9aca4
commit r12-10748-g2ab55da5eba0aa7a92e15d8100d51cc977f9aca4
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115399
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f655ef43621cc022745c3aa9c77e3725b9280cd
commit r12-10753-g1f655ef43621cc022745c3aa9c77e3725b9280cd
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116641
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115585
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115399
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And 13.4 and 12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115399
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116982
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is likely that if-conversion produced a vector loop copy with a
different number of exit edges than the original not if-converted version
because of if-conversion doing simple DCE/FRE/DSE but the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116979
--- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente ---
I'm just taking the product of two complex numbers, cannot call std::fma in the
user code: reimplementing the operator* is not trivial (and is a stdlib job
anyhow)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116991
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116990
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Hum. The following should have prevented that, but ...
/* Check if we have any control flow that doesn't leave the loop. */
class loop *v_loop = loop->inner ? loop->inner : loop;
... not sure why we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116992
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116997
Bug ID: 116997
Summary: [13/14/15 Regression] Wrong bitfield accesses since
r13-3219-g25413fdb2ac249
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #384 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 59289
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59289&action=edit
a reduced test case for c#378 (with -O2 -fpic)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #16 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
> > We added one more argument for __builtin_clear_padding to distinguish
> > whether this call is for AUTO_INIT or not.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117001
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Works for me on the trunk:
[apinski@xeond2 upstream-cross-aarch64]$ ./install/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-g++
-static t.cc
[apinski@xeond2 upstream-cross-aarch64]$ ./install-qemu/bin/qemu-aarch64 a.out
[0, 0, 0, 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117001
--- Comment #5 from Robert Hardwick ---
Not working on 11.4.0, i'll try 11.5.0 as you suggest.
$ g++ --version
g++ (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0
g++ -O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve test.cpp -o test
$:~/tools/pytorch/pytorch/argmin_test$ ./te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117001
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I needed to add the following 2 includes to get the testcase to compile:
```
#include
#include
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117001
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117000
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>In GCC 14+ the compilation converges to test1 also in test2.
So what is happening in GCC 13 is SLP vectorizer is not able to vectorizer
test2 but GCC 14 is. The loop vectorizer is able to handle test1 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116984
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117000
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116990
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0b71618157ddac52266909978f331406f98f3a2
commit r15-4108-gb0b71618157ddac52266909978f331406f98f3a2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.0|14.3
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116982
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b86efd5210101954bd187c3aa8bb909610a5746
commit r15-4107-g9b86efd5210101954bd187c3aa8bb909610a5746
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Summary|[14/15 Regregr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #18 from Qing Zhao ---
> On Oct 7, 2024, at 11:34, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
> I see, thanks for investigation! This was overlooked because the C family of
> compiler do not use the declaration built in common_builtin_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116578
Bug 116578 depends on bug 116583, which changed state.
Bug 116583 Summary: vectorizable_slp_permutation cannot handle even/odd extract
from VLA vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116583
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116933
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Okay, by searching the history, looks like that the following patch forget
> to update the above routine when merging the 2nd and 3rd parameters for
> __builtin_clear_padding:
I see, thanks for investig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116983
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117000
Bug ID: 117000
Summary: Inefficient code for 32-byte struct comparison (ptest
missing)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117001
Bug ID: 117001
Summary: O3 auto tree loop vectorization produces incorrect
output on armv8.2-a+sve
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117001
--- Comment #1 from Robert Hardwick ---
Apolgies, i've got that the wrong way around.
With -O3 -fno-tree-loop-vectorize -march=armv8.2-a+sve output is CORRECT
[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0]
with -O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve output is INCORRECT
[0, 0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116974
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
One issue is that with SLP scheduling we're relying on data dependence to order
vector stmts in the correct order. With omp scan we have scalar code like
_12 = .GOMP_SIMD_LANE (simduid.2_6(D), 0);
_13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114729
--- Comment #20 from Vineet Gupta ---
The model schedule change (at tweak9) seems stable and showing very promising
result.
The hottest basic block's reg pressure drops down significantly
;; Pressure summary (bb 206): GR_REGS:313 FP_REGS:946
;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #26 from LIU Hao ---
Comment on attachment 59290
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59290
Newer patch for TLS support, incomplete
> + "mov{l}\t{_tls_index(%%rip), %k0|%k0, DWORD PTR
> [rip+_tls_index]}\;mov{q}\t{%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114729
--- Comment #21 from Vineet Gupta ---
The code is currently pushed to
https://github.com/vineetgarc/gcc/commits/topic-sched1/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
--- Comment #4 from Matt Bentley ---
Yeah, I know, I mentioned that in the report.
It's not a bad benchmark, it's benchmarking access of individual consecutive
bits, not summing. The counting is merely for preventing the compiler from
optimizin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
--- Comment #5 from Matt Bentley ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you provide the output of invoking g++ with -march=native and when
> compiling?
The .ii files were identical, so did you you mean .o files?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117006
Bug ID: 117006
Summary: [15 regression] GCC trunk generates larger code than
GCC 14 at -Os
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
Bug ID: 117007
Summary: Poor optimiation for small vector constants needed for
vector shift/rotate/mask genration.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117007
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117004
Bug ID: 117004
Summary: Unexpected const variable type with decltype of
non-type template parameter of deduced type
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117005
Bug ID: 117005
Summary: Parallel Mode algorithms need to qualify all calls
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116983
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117004
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117006
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #27 from Julian Waters ---
X(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #26)
> Comment on attachment 59290 [details]
> Newer patch for TLS support, incomplete
>
> > + "mov{l}\t{_tls_index(%%rip), %k0|%k0, DWORD PTR
> > [rip+_tls_index]}\;mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #28 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Julian Waters from comment #27)
> I think I remember clang using __tls_index instead of _tls_index for 32 bit
> as well, but that's the only difference I remember. On another note, Cygwin
Yes, you ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117010
Bug ID: 117010
Summary: [nvptx] Incorrect ptx code-gen for C++ code with
templates
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117003
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105001
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117000
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
Status|U
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
