https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116997
Bug ID: 116997
Summary: [13/14/15 Regression] Wrong bitfield accesses since
r13-3219-g25413fdb2ac249
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: stefansf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: s390x-*-*
struct S0
{
unsigned f0;
signed f2 : 11;
signed : 6;
} GlobS, *Ptr = &GlobS;
const struct S0 Initializer = {7, 3};
int main (void)
{
for (unsigned i = 0; i <= 2; i++)
*Ptr = Initializer;
if (GlobS.f2 != 3)
__builtin_abort ();
return 0;
}
gcc -march=z13 -O2 t.c
(should fail for any arch which supports vector extensions)
During ifcvt we have
Start lowering bitfields
Lowering:
Ptr.0_1->f2 = 3;
to:
_ifc__24 = Ptr.0_1->D.2918;
_ifc__25 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <_ifc__24, 3, 0 (11 bits)>;
Ptr.0_1->D.2918 = _ifc__25;
Done lowering bitfields
...
Match-and-simplified BIT_INSERT_EXPR <_ifc__24, 3, 0 (11 bits)> to 3
RHS BIT_INSERT_EXPR <_ifc__24, 3, 0 (11 bits)> simplified to 3
Setting value number of _ifc__25 to 3 (changed)
Replaced BIT_INSERT_EXPR <_ifc__24, 3, 0 (11 bits)> with 3 in all uses of
_ifc__25 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <_ifc__24, 3, 0 (11 bits)>;
Value numbering stmt = Ptr.0_1->D.2918 = _ifc__25;
which in the end leads to the optimized tree output
int main ()
{
struct S0 * Ptr.0_1;
unsigned int _2;
unsigned int _3;
<bb 2> [local count: 268435458]:
Ptr.0_1 = Ptr;
MEM <vector(2) unsigned int> [(void *)Ptr.0_1] = { 7, 3 };
_2 = BIT_FIELD_REF <GlobS, 32, 32>;
_3 = _2 & 4292870144;
if (_3 != 6291456)
goto <bb 3>; [0.00%]
else
goto <bb 4>; [100.00%]
<bb 3> [count: 0]:
__builtin_abort ();
<bb 4> [local count: 268435456]:
return 0;
}
Since bitfields are left aligned on s390, constant 3 is wrong and should rather
be 0x600000.