[Bug target/113871] psrlq is not used for PERM

2024-02-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113871 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #57417|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/113917] New: ice in gfc_class_vptr_get

2024-02-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113917 Bug ID: 113917 Summary: ice in gfc_class_vptr_get Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assi

[Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O with ipa-modref on aarch64

2024-02-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 --- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 > > --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- > > > > IVOPTs does the above but it does it (

[Bug rtl-optimization/113617] [14 Regression] Symbol ... referenced in section `.data.rel.ro.local' of ...: defined in discarded section ... since r14-4944

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113617 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is waiting for review https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/644580.html

[Bug fortran/113917] ice in gfc_class_vptr_get

2024-02-14 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113917 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0) >The problem seems to exist since sometime before 2024016. That should be 20240116.

[Bug c++/113706] c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c FAILs as C++

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab0c2c367a87b03f38a486a118b89335837619dc commit r14-8971-gab0c2c367a87b03f38a486a118b89335837619dc Author: Rainer Orth Date: Wed F

[Bug c++/113706] c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c FAILs as C++

2024-02-14 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth --- xfailed for GCC 14.0.1. Keep PR open for the underlying bug.

[Bug libstdc++/113841] Can't swap two std::hash

2024-02-14 Thread ostash at ostash dot kiev.ua via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113841 --- Comment #9 from Viktor Ostashevskyi --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > Calling swap unqualified performs ADL, which has to find all the associated > namespaces and associated classes. To do that it has to complete all the >

[Bug middle-end/113694] Allow renaming stack smashing protector symbols

2024-02-14 Thread matheus.a.m.moreira at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694 --- Comment #4 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > Note that this isn't something GCC offers for other things, e.g. PR97119. GCC does offer it for at least one thing that I'm aware of: -e entry

[Bug middle-end/113907] [14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, to sum up what has been discussed on IRC, LTO streaming doesn't seem to stream SSA_NAME_INFO, only the final IPA phases of say IPA-VRP can set SSA_NAME_INFO. Thus, this bug is most likely solely about -

[Bug middle-end/113907] [14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/113907] [14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #25) > So, to sum up what has been discussed on IRC, LTO streaming doesn't seem to > stream SSA_NAME_INFO, only the final IPA phases of say IPA-VRP can set > SSA_NAM

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-14 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 |sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11,

[Bug debug/113918] New: Incomplete DWARF5 debug information for anonymous unions

2024-02-14 Thread tsqurt at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113918 Bug ID: 113918 Summary: Incomplete DWARF5 debug information for anonymous unions Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Note GCC 13 seems to dislike the preprocessed source (odd, 12 and trunk are happy...) In file included from /usr/gcc/11/include/c++/11.4.0/memory:76, from /vol/llvm/src/llvm-project/local/

[Bug middle-end/113907] [14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- So: --- gcc/ipa-icf.cc.jj 2024-02-10 11:25:09.645478952 +0100 +++ gcc/ipa-icf.cc 2024-02-14 10:44:27.906216458 +0100 @@ -1244,6 +1244,29 @@ sem_function::merge (sem_item *alias_ite else creat

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113915] [14 regression] glibc's _dl_find_object_update_1 miscompiled for armv7a since r14-4365-g0731889c026bfe

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113915 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/113918] Incomplete DWARF5 debug information for anonymous unions

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113918 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-14 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- With only enabling early PTA via -fdisable-tree-alias -fdisable-tree-pre I got the compile finished in 18 minutes and tree PTA :1044.48 ( 98%) 1.53 ( 27%)1046.29 ( 97%) 4341k

[Bug middle-end/113907] [14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-02-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #28 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 > > --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- > So: > --- gcc/ipa-icf.cc.jj 2024-02-10

[Bug target/113909] gcc.target/i386/pr113689-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113909 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d79aa77d9b2fe757b1bbda45defd4ac02b077a78 commit r14-8973-gd79aa77d9b2fe757b1bbda45defd4ac02b077a78 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Wed F

[Bug target/113909] gcc.target/i386/pr113689-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-02-14 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113909 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug d/104739] gdc.test/runnable/mangle.d etc. FAIL with Solaris as

2024-02-14 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104739 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/113915] [14 regression] glibc's _dl_find_object_update_1 miscompiled for armv7a since r14-4365-g0731889c026bfe

2024-02-14 Thread wilco at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113915 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc d

[Bug c++/99573] ICE in module: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in start_enum, at cp/decl.c:15663

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99573 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbb30f12a7e5ce008f59ec26c9e4cc65ee79fe56 commit r14-8974-gbbb30f12a7e5ce008f59ec26c9e4cc65ee79fe56 Author: Nathaniel Shead Date:

[Bug c++/99573] ICE in module: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in start_enum, at cp/decl.c:15663

2024-02-14 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99573 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Assignee|unas

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

2024-02-14 Thread nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 99573, which changed state. Bug 99573 Summary: ICE in module: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in start_enum, at cp/decl.c:15663 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Cutting the switch in decodeToMCInst after case 693: (roughly halving it by the number of source lines) gets us to tree PTA : 129.70 ( 92%) 0.51 ( 14%) 130.28 ( 90%) 2279k (

[Bug c/66425] (void) cast doesn't suppress __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

2024-02-14 Thread groessler_christian at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425 Christian Groessler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||groessler_christian at yahoo dot d

[Bug rtl-optimization/10837] noreturn attribute causes no sibling calling optimization

2024-02-14 Thread lukas.graetz--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10837 --- Comment #18 from Lukas Grätz --- On another thought: I think something like -fignore-backtrace could be a reasonable optimization flag (enabled by default for -O4). By ignoring the backtrace we could do other optimizations on size and speed,

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 57422 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57422&action=edit patch I'm testing the attached which brings down compile-time to the levels of GCC 11 again (a bit faster ev

[Bug tree-optimization/113896] [12 Regression] Assigning array elements in the wrong order after floating point optimization since r12-8841

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113896 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/113896] [12 Regression] Assigning array elements in the wrong order after floating point optimization since r12-8841

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113896 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f16c53558d01135f0f78cf78a2f722b774684d7 commit r12-10155-g2f16c53558d01135f0f78cf78a2f722b774684d7 Author: Richard Biene

[Bug target/111677] [12 Regression] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 --- Comment #31 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fddce05d67f34174be0f306e1015d3868bbe7c31 commit r12-10156-gfddce05d67f34174be0f306e1015d3868bbe7c31 Author: Alex Coplan Da

[Bug target/111677] darktable build on aarch64 fails with unrecognizable insn due to -fstack-protector changes

2024-02-14 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 Regression] darktable |darktable build on aarch64

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #46 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5352ede92483b949e811cbdcdfaec5378f3e06d6 commit r14-8975-g5352ede92483b949e811cbdcdfaec5378f3e06d6 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/113899] Vect module test failures while running on remote host due to default dg-do set to compile and additional-sources being used

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113899 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:948dbc5ee45f9ffd5f41fd6782704081cc7c8c27 commit r14-8978-g948dbc5ee45f9ffd5f41fd6782704081cc7c8c27 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Tu

[Bug testsuite/113899] Vect module test failures while running on remote host due to default dg-do set to compile and additional-sources being used

2024-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113899 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #48 from Uroš Bizjak --- The runtime testcase fails on non-AVX512F x86 targets due to: /* { dg-do run } */ /* { dg-options "-O3" } */ /* { dg-additional-options "-march=skylake-avx512" { target { x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } } } */ but ch

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #49 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #48) > The runtime testcase fails on non-AVX512F x86 targets due to: > > /* { dg-do run } */ > /* { dg-options "-O3" } */ > /* { dg-additional-options "-march=skylake

[Bug d/104739] gdc.test/runnable/mangle.d etc. FAIL with Solaris as

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104739 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a032c319cb9cf5348d71f008f311bcf95f3dac40 commit r14-8979-ga032c319cb9cf5348d71f008f311bcf95f3dac40 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Wed

[Bug d/104739] gdc.test/runnable/mangle.d etc. FAIL with Solaris as

2024-02-14 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104739 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org |ro at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug c++/113706] c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c FAILs as C++

2024-02-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #50 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #49) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #48) > > The runtime testcase fails on non-AVX512F x86 targets due to: > > > > /* { dg-do run } */ > > /* { dg-options

[Bug c++/113706] c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c FAILs as C++

2024-02-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 57423 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57423&action=edit patch for GCC 15 Here's a fix, but since this isn't a regression it can wait for stage 1.

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #51 from Jakub Jelinek --- >From the -mavx* options I think -march=skylake-avx512 implies -mavx512{f,cd,vl,bw,dq} but -mavx512f is implied by any of the latter 4.

[Bug analyzer/110090] -fanalyze sometimes assumes contradictory conditions to be valid at the same time during path exploration

2024-02-14 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110090 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Thanks for filing this bug report, and sorry for not responding before. Are you still able to reproduce this? If so, please can you use -save-temps to generated a preprocessed file (.i) that reproduces the

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #52 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 57424 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57424&action=edit Proposed testsuite patch This patch fixes the failure for me (+ some other dg.exp/vect inconsistencies).

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #53 from Jakub Jelinek --- Comment on attachment 57424 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57424 Proposed testsuite patch As skylake-avx512 is -mavx512{f,cd,bw,dq,vl}, requiring just avx512f effective target and tes

[Bug analyzer/111441] [14 Regression] ICE generating access diagram, in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.cc:11580

2024-02-14 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111441 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|internal compiler error: in |[14 Regression] ICE |

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Note after the proper fix we still have (gdb) p pointer_equiv_class_table->m_searches $17 = 180497 (gdb) p pointer_equiv_class_table->m_collisions $18 = 4101085 (gdb) p pointer_equiv_class_table->m_n_el

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13/14 regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad7a365aaccecd23ea287c7faaab9c7bd50b944a commit r14-8980-gad7a365aaccecd23ea287c7faaab9c7bd50b944a Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c++/113919] New: Nested anonymous unions should be prohibited in ISO C++

2024-02-14 Thread tsqurt at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113919 Bug ID: 113919 Summary: Nested anonymous unions should be prohibited in ISO C++ Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug ada/113868] bogus error for delta aggregate as expression function

2024-02-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113868 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Last rec

[Bug c++/113919] Nested anonymous unions should be prohibited in ISO C++

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113919 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-14 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug ada/113877] gnatchop -c puts gnat.adc in the current working directory

2024-02-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113877 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O with ipa-modref on aarch64

2024-02-14 Thread Jan Hubicka via Gcc-bugs
> > I guess PTA gets around by tracking points-to set also for non-pointer > > types and consequently it also gives up on any such addition. > > It does. But note it does _not_ for POINTER_PLUS where it treats > the offset operand as non-pointer. > > > I think it is ipa-prop.c::unadjusted_ptr_an

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #54 from Richard Biener --- Please also verify the bug reproduced with the altered set of options. What's the reason to have avx512-check.h in addition to tree-vect.h? At least for the vectorizer testsuite the latter is the canonica

[Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O with ipa-modref on aarch64

2024-02-14 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 --- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka --- > > I guess PTA gets around by tracking points-to set also for non-pointer > > types and consequently it also gives up on any such addition. > > It does. But note it does _not_ for POINTER_PLUS where it tre

[Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O with ipa-modref on aarch64

2024-02-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 > > --- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka --- > > > I guess PTA gets around by tracking point

[Bug tree-optimization/113910] [12/13 Regression] Factor 15 slowdown compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp on SPARC

2024-02-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14 regression] |[12/13 Regression] Factor

[Bug tree-optimization/113787] [12/13/14 Regression] Wrong code at -O with ipa-modref on aarch64

2024-02-14 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113787 --- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka --- > Note I didn't check if it helps the testcase .. I will check. > > > > > > > A "nicer" solution might be to add a informational operand > > > to TARGET_MEM_REF, representing the base pointer to be used fo

[Bug c++/113332] [12/13/14 regression] checking ICE when building fcitx-5.1.6

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9bc6b23d11697545e8a951ccd60691b1e58b98c2 commit r14-8981-g9bc6b23d11697545e8a951ccd60691b1e58b98c2 Author: Patrick Palka Date: W

[Bug c++/113908] [14 Regression] bogus access error with new-expr of current non-template class with implicitly deleted copy ctor since r14-557

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113908 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9bc6b23d11697545e8a951ccd60691b1e58b98c2 commit r14-8981-g9bc6b23d11697545e8a951ccd60691b1e58b98c2 Author: Patrick Palka Date: W

[Bug c++/113908] [14 Regression] bogus access error with new-expr of current non-template class with implicitly deleted copy ctor since r14-557

2024-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113908 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/113332] [12/13 regression] checking ICE when building fcitx-5.1.6

2024-02-14 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/113919] Nested anonymous unions should be prohibited in ISO C++

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113919 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- I suppose this should fix it but there are testsuite FAILs. --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc @@ -5522,6 +5522,12 @@ fixup_anonymous_aggr (tree t) } } } + /* [class.union.an

[Bug tree-optimization/113576] [14 regression] 502.gcc_r hangs r14-8223-g1c1853a70f9422169190e65e568dcccbce02d95c

2024-02-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113576 --- Comment #55 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #53) > Comment on attachment 57424 [details] > Proposed testsuite patch > > As skylake-avx512 is -mavx512{f,cd,bw,dq,vl}, requiring just avx512f > effective target and

[Bug middle-end/113907] [14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-02-14 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug ada/113893] finalization issue with anonymous access object of local type

2024-02-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113893 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug ada/113893] finalization issue with anonymous access object of local type

2024-02-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113893 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #2 from Eric Botc

[Bug middle-end/113907] [14 regression] ICU miscompiled since on x86 since r14-5109-ga291237b628f41

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113907 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 57426 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57426&action=edit gcc14-pr113907.patch I've managed to come up with a small runtime testcase. Now with a patch which does the r

[Bug libfortran/99210] X editing for reading file with encoding='utf-8'

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99210 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b79d3e6a9284703b70688122f7d4955e7c50804a commit r14-8983-gb79d3e6a9284703b70688122f7d4955e7c50804a Author: Jerry DeLisle Date: Tu

[Bug c++/113919] Nested anonymous unions should be prohibited in ISO C++

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113919 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- clang++ has -Wnested-anon-types so I think we need that too.

[Bug ipa/113291] [14 Regression] compilation never (?) finishes with recursive always_inline functions at -O and above since r14-2172

2024-02-14 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113291 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- There is a cap in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p which gives up on inlining after reaching max recursive inlining depth of 8. Problem is that the tree here is too wide. After early inlining f0 contains 4 ca

[Bug ada/113893] finalization issue with anonymous access object of local type

2024-02-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113893 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug ipa/113291] [14 Regression] compilation never (?) finishes with recursive always_inline functions at -O and above since r14-2172

2024-02-14 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113291 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- There is a cap in want_inline_self_recursive_call_p which gives up on inlining after reaching max recursive inlining depth of 8. Problem is that the tree here is too wide. After early inlining f0 contains 4 ca

[Bug c++/72751] anonymous union within an anonymous union accepted without diagnostic (i.e. add -Wnested-anon-types)

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72751 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tsqurt at outlook dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/113919] Nested anonymous unions should be prohibited in ISO C++

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113919 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72751] anonymous union within an anonymous union accepted without diagnostic (i.e. add -Wnested-anon-types)

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72751 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/72751] anonymous union within an anonymous union accepted without diagnostic (i.e. add -Wnested-anon-types)

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72751 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- We should also make sure that __extension__ suppresses the -Wnested-anon-types diagnostic.

[Bug middle-end/111054] [14 Regression] ICE: in to_sreal, at profile-count.cc:472 with -O3 -fno-guess-branch-probability since r14-2967

2024-02-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111054 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d51bfe0f97a27c749c36003867901338833340a commit r14-8985-g8d51bfe0f97a27c749c36003867901338833340a Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Wed F

[Bug middle-end/111054] [14 Regression] ICE: in to_sreal, at profile-count.cc:472 with -O3 -fno-guess-branch-probability since r14-2967

2024-02-14 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111054 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/113920] New: Make -std=gnu++20 default for GCC 15

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113920 Bug ID: 113920 Summary: Make -std=gnu++20 default for GCC 15 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/113920] Make -std=gnu++20 default for GCC 15

2024-02-14 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113920 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression] std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs

2024-02-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113450 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > I assume that int8_t is char on Solaris, rather than signed char? This actually violates the C and C++ standards, which require that intN_t is a signed inte

[Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression] std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113450 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression] std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs

2024-02-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113450 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's technically an ABI break, since void f(int8_t) would mangle differently. It probably wouldn't affect much in practice, but would still be a break.

[Bug libstdc++/113450] [14 Regression] std/format/functions/format.cc FAILs

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113450 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Or convince Oracle to change it (again, an ABI break).

[Bug ipa/113291] [14 Regression] compilation never (?) finishes with recursive always_inline functions at -O and above since r14-2172

2024-02-14 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113291 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 57427 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57427&action=edit patch The patch makes compilation to finish in reasonable time. I ended up in need to dropping DISREGARD_INLINE_

[Bug c/113921] New: Output register of an "asm volatile goto" is incorrectly clobbered/discarded

2024-02-14 Thread seanjc at google dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113921 Bug ID: 113921 Summary: Output register of an "asm volatile goto" is incorrectly clobbered/discarded Product: gcc Version: 11.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/103908] gcc miscompile asm goto for O1

2024-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103908 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0|10.3.0, 11.2.0, 9.4.0 Known to wor

[Bug libstdc++/113074] std::to_address should be SFINAE safe

2024-02-14 Thread pkasting at google dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113074 --- Comment #14 from Peter Kasting --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > As I said in comment 7, LWG considered this case and it was pointed out that > the problem described can only occur if a type defines iterator_concept = > co

[Bug middle-end/113415] ICE: RTL check: -mstringop-strategy=byte_loop vs inline-asm goto with block copies

2024-02-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113415 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/113567] ICE: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 1 and 3 which are marked as MUST COALESCE. with _BitInt() and computed goto

2024-02-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113567 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/113893] finalization issue with anonymous access object of local type

2024-02-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113893 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/113862] error: "others" choice not allowed here

2024-02-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113862 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever c

  1   2   >