https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113030
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
so I looked into config/arm/parsecpu.awk and yes it ignores aliases for chkarch
but I don't think that matters to the end user ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113030
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Or rather there is a typo in the script.
This fixes the script's chkarch and chkcpu commands:
```
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/parsecpu.awk b/gcc/config/arm/parsecpu.awk
index b827d71dded..fdc6e35a7ce 100644
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113030
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||internal-improvement
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112999
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113003
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d50d3d0a688e8dac31b307b3aad3fbc99283ebc4
commit r14-6579-gd50d3d0a688e8dac31b307b3aad3fbc99283ebc4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113024
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:330f1e078dae257d4f8f7b13299ececc2344e681
commit r14-6580-g330f1e078dae257d4f8f7b13299ececc2344e681
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113003
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112906
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bac33a522bb51e30729191e935f25c2b0a63e225
commit r14-6582-gbac33a522bb51e30729191e935f25c2b0a63e225
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Fri D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112906
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alex Coplan :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef9754dfdf18a89de3da23c4f23365f4c2611367
commit r14-6583-gef9754dfdf18a89de3da23c4f23365f4c2611367
Author: Alex Coplan
Date: Fri D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112906
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111591
--- Comment #38 from Kewen Lin ---
I found this has been marked as resolved but it seems that the patch in comment
#34 hasn't been pushed, is it intended? or did I miss something that one commit
was pushed but wasn't associated to this PR?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And after the PR113024 changes, one needs -O1 -fno-tree-forwprop on:
unsigned _BitInt(2049)
foo (unsigned _BitInt(6384) x, _BitInt(8) y)
{
unsigned _BitInt(6384) z = y;
return x * z;
}
_BitInt(2049)
bar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113026
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I do have a patch to avoid the epilog, but that doesn't help when adjusting the
testcase to
char dst[17];
void
foo (char *src, long n)
{
for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
dst[i] = src[i];
}
because then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111591
--- Comment #39 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #38)
> I found this has been marked as resolved but it seems that the patch in
> comment #34 hasn't been pushed, is it intended? or did I miss something that
> one commi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113021
--- Comment #2 from Miro Palmu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed. We should reduce this to remove the include file too ...
Here is somewhat reduced:
```
#include
auto alloc = std::allocator{};
constexpr auto n = 3;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113021
--- Comment #3 from Miro Palmu ---
Here is even more reduced. Notice that if the unused data member `pointer` is
removed from `vec` the problem goes away. Same with data member `a` in struct
`A`.
```
struct vec {
int data;
int* pointer;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Testcase covering various cases where 2 consecutive casts can't be optimized
away.
This ICEs in multiple ways as well:
void
f1 (_BitInt(4096) *p, int r, _BitInt(115) s, _BitInt(128) t, _BitInt(231) u)
{
p[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
Bug ID: 113031
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1
starting with r14-6508
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 56884
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56884&action=edit
Gzipped preprocessed source
Compile the attached .ii with '-std=gnu++20 -O' (or any non-zero optimization
le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71093
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111591
--- Comment #40 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39)
> (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #38)
> > I found this has been marked as resolved but it seems that the patch in
> > comment #34 hasn't been pushed, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111591
--- Comment #41 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #40)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39)
> > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #38)
> > > I found this has been marked as resolved but it seems tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113030
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Yes, that looks sensible. Can you post it please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107857
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Could you please run this and paste the output here?
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
unsigned long
muh_handles()
{
unsigned long n = 0;
if (GetProcessHandleCount(GetCurrentProce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110298
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e332ee568739448a9439c7074d2a29badba60f2
commit r11-11141-g0e332ee568739448a9439c7074d2a29badba60f2
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110295
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01f088741bec84f8fa86f87fdb73db07d5febb0a
commit r11-11140-g01f088741bec84f8fa86f87fdb73db07d5febb0a
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111818
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45c296f2d81f6259e268e07707b4aa87dffba20a
commit r11-11142-g45c296f2d81f6259e268e07707b4aa87dffba20a
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111764
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7473b2742aa1637d14a64505e855aa09452536b1
commit r11-11143-g7473b2742aa1637d14a64505e855aa09452536b1
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03b5888abc9fe9a81df77125a8d4975ab8695c8c
commit r11-11144-g03b5888abc9fe9a81df77125a8d4975ab8695c8c
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111917
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec8d0c33211c5e92c220483d6fe9f0a2391d2d6d
commit r11-11145-gec8d0c33211c5e92c220483d6fe9f0a2391d2d6d
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110298
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.1
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110116
Bug 110116 depends on bug 111614, which changed state.
Bug 111614 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE at -O2: verify_gimple failed since
r14-2282-gf703d2fd3f0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113022
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs ---
This is what I get for trying to get this done before vacation. :(
Yes, there's probably something in mkoffload that has to match the default
change from -mxnack=any to -mxnack=off on the older ISAs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107857
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See also https://stackoverflow.com/a/77515095/981959
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107857
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> See also https://stackoverflow.com/a/77515095/981959
And my comment there:
This seems like a bug in winpthreads. The INITIALIZER macro should not exist if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And another testcase which ICEs:
unsigned _BitInt(495) f1 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x;
return y; }
unsigned _BitInt(495) f2 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y =
x;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113026
--- Comment #4 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Drive by comments as it's been a while since I looked at this. I'm also
surprised we didn't adjust the bounds. But why do we only subtract VF? Like you
say, if there's no loop around edge, can't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111253
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e26608db3c2b2644decca5f49dab1e6846a9d1b0
commit r12-10041-ge26608db3c2b2644decca5f49dab1e6846a9d1b0
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e35556c61bdeb9f41b4111fffb423a705232ab9c
commit r12-10043-ge35556c61bdeb9f41b4111fffb423a705232ab9c
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111080
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c3ab44771d0524140cf2ce5de594fcf7fefcd6f
commit r12-10044-g5c3ab44771d0524140cf2ce5de594fcf7fefcd6f
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99919
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-11-30 00:00:00 |2023-12-15
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107986
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
We now diagnose
std::__insertion_sort.isra (&a, &MEM [(void *)&a + 64B]);
the reason is still the same, failure to compute a range for 'qa' which
we fail to SCEV analyze. There's a duplicate bug about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
--- Comment #2 from Nathaniel Shead ---
Reduced to:
template class variant;
template
auto __variant_cast(_Tp __rhs) { return static_cast&&>(__rhs);
}
template
struct _Move_assign_base : _Types {
void operator=(_Move_assign_base __rhs) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113031
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113013
--- Comment #6 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
Sorry I misread the reproducer as void *reallocarray(void)
__attribute__((__alloc_size__(1)));
Your fix looks fine to me, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Carlos Galvez from comment #11)
> Consider this more realistic example:
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/jbbqbe8d9
>
> The compiler has all the information available to ensure that
> getCount().get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c0ea9320ce4d2381ebf043cd20a0afce88da880
commit r13-8159-g8c0ea9320ce4d2381ebf043cd20a0afce88da880
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112727
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a982b9cb690a163434f1ac5a0901548b594205f2
commit r13-8160-ga982b9cb690a163434f1ac5a0901548b594205f2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44179
--- Comment #3 from Zack Weinberg ---
It's come to my attention that people fairly often write `sizeof('x')` (or some
other character constant), _expecting_ it to evaluate as `sizeof(char)`. But
this is only true in C++. In C, `sizeof('x')` eval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109715
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46984fa259436ad50afb50a46a0a16e83bdf7172
commit r14-6594-g46984fa259436ad50afb50a46a0a16e83bdf7172
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88061
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
commit r14-6595-gea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70435
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
commit r14-6595-gea7bebff7cc5a5eb780a6ca646cb77cad1b625d6
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 56886
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56886&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is the proposed fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d7a480eedf0a195318d0fce2c9c57acae43ec9d
commit r14-6596-g7d7a480eedf0a195318d0fce2c9c57acae43ec9d
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #5 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com ---
many thanks for the bug report - all fixed in gcc master branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113032
Bug ID: 113032
Summary: RISCV linker relaxation leaves redundant addi (from
load immediate)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113033
Bug ID: 113033
Summary: GCC 14 (20231203 snapshot) ICE when building LSX
vector rotate code on LoongArch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83417
waffl3x changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||waffl3x at protonmail dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113034
Bug ID: 113034
Summary: Miscompilation of __m128 ne comparison on LoongArch
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113035
Bug ID: 113035
Summary: RISC-V: -mtune=sifive-7-series additional dump
failures found with bitmanip, zicond, and vector
targets
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113036
Bug ID: 113036
Summary: GNAT BUG DETECTED ICE box triggered by a default value
that is a nested iterated aggregate
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113037
Bug ID: 113037
Summary: GNAT BUG DETECTED when instantiating generic package
with Type_Invariant on a type derived from a generic
type
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113009
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113021
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like it is the uninitialized field pointer which is causing the issues.
Looks like GCC does not currently fully support that for const variables inside
a constexpr/consteval . The linked PRs are about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 109796, which changed state.
Bug 109796 Summary: 548.exchange2_r compiled with -O2 -flto regressed by 5% on
aarch64 between r14-135-gd06e9264b0192c and r14-192-g636e2273aec555
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112918
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've been working on the PR this week. The problem for this case is in that
for subreg reload LRA can not narrow reg class more from ALL_REGS to
GENERAL_REGS and then to data regs or address regs.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112944
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112792
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a
commit r14-6606-ga1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
commit a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: Fri Dec 15 13:05:18 2023 -0800
fortran: Update degree trigs documentation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:082835836cf763e74ed2fdf9645ac4f1f94d6d4f
commit r14-6607-g082835836cf763e74ed2fdf9645ac4f1f94d6d4f
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Dec 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112873
--- Comment #33 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #32)
> commit a1f0d227481fe143f8c15b3f268e2d5964a3c90a (HEAD -> master,
> origin/master, origin/HEAD)
> Author: Jerry DeLisle
> Date: Fri Dec 15 13:05:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105733
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112896
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97592
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113038
Bug ID: 113038
Summary: [14 regression] Excess errors for
g++.dg/modules/hello-1_b.C after
r14-6569-gfe54b57728c09a
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86970
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 86970, which changed state.
Bug 86970 Summary: Rejected constexpr expression involving lambdas and
inheritance, "use of this in a constant expression"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86970
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110731
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a93c334865af18ce2fd50cd77a9e90939f3c231
commit r12-10046-g9a93c334865af18ce2fd50cd77a9e90939f3c231
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111967
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:327713d54122ab5635f3c385aecf113e5afe190c
commit r12-10049-g327713d54122ab5635f3c385aecf113e5afe190c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
