https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111591
--- Comment #41 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #40) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39) > > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #38) > > > I found this has been marked as resolved but it seems that the patch in > > > comment #34 hasn't been pushed, is it intended? or did I miss something > > > that > > > one commit was pushed but wasn't associated to this PR? > > > > Yes, that was intended - the patch is not necessary, there's no bug on the > > TBAA side. I understand that highway itself is now fine (for whatever > > reason) and > > the reduced testcase invokes undefined behavior. > > Could someone confirm that patch in c30 is merged (commit id would be > nice!), since it solve the other test case ? Thanks No it's not merged, it's basically the same as the comment#34 one and shouldn't be needed (but it might cause another unidentified issue to become latent). What's the "other" testcase? Do we know that doesn't suffer from the same uninitialized issue?
