https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110360
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #6)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #4)
>
> > Looks good.
> > I would suggest to create an overload that avoids duplicating the
> > build_int_cst (integer_type_node,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78904
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110102
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110280
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85d8e0d8d5342ec8b4e6a54e22741c30b33c6f04
commit r14-2044-g85d8e0d8d5342ec8b4e6a54e22741c30b33c6f04
Author: Prathamesh Kulkar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96117
Stephen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109983
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a737da4885b7038fdd7d6646deaa1644efff2257
commit r13-7466-ga737da4885b7038fdd7d6646deaa1644efff2257
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110055
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0856bb588c76e16a518b459a8c9a012dc2b4e21
commit r13-7467-gb0856bb588c76e16a518b459a8c9a012dc2b4e21
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110298
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9da2ef362fa8dc54df26c704a38dda40baee3ce9
commit r13-7469-g9da2ef362fa8dc54df26c704a38dda40baee3ce9
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110295
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b69fea6cf12d82f82439f26527ef8721e24411e
commit r13-7468-g0b69fea6cf12d82f82439f26527ef8721e24411e
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109143
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a737da4885b7038fdd7d6646deaa1644efff2257
commit r13-7466-ga737da4885b7038fdd7d6646deaa1644efff2257
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104077
Bug 104077 depends on bug 110055, which changed state.
Bug 110055 Summary: [13 Regression] Dangling pointer warning inside std::vector
on RISC-V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110055
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Comdats are really in conflict with the fact that we have command line options.
I blame C++ standard for that and I don't think there is fully satisfactory
solution to this problem.
I was playing with the ide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110374
Bug ID: 110374
Summary: slightly incorrect warning text "ISO C forbids forward
parameter declarations"
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> Comdats are really in conflict with the fact that we have command line
> options. I blame C++ standard for that and I don't think there is fully
> satisfactory so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110182
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f06f1b4102b1c6965ad6b1da0094d6de5c3a2940
commit r12-9722-gf06f1b4102b1c6965ad6b1da0094d6de5c3a2940
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110298
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c409f2a1cc5d5bffe2fb93454924ae402c57f8f6
commit r12-9723-gc409f2a1cc5d5bffe2fb93454924ae402c57f8f6
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Jakub, given that 'libgomp is usually the “long tail” of [...] testing' (GCC
IRC, 2023-06-05), Iain has asked that I backport to release branches the
changes implemented here:
- commit r14-854-ge797db5c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110375
Bug ID: 110375
Summary: -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero issues with pointers to
data members
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104242
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fc6b3a03355e1f77a7c38c0fa7afb0822ad954f
commit r11-10870-g5fc6b3a03355e1f77a7c38c0fa7afb0822ad954f
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.5|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > I was playing with the idea of warning when at lto time when comdats have
> > different command line options, but this triggers way too often in practice.
>
> Really? :/
Yep, for example firefox consist o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Just so it is somewhere, here is a testcase that we can't inline leaf
functions to always_inlines unless we do some tracking of what calls
were formerly indirect calls.
We really overloaded always_inline from
Just so it is somewhere, here is a testcase that we can't inline leaf
functions to always_inlines unless we do some tracking of what calls
were formerly indirect calls.
We really overloaded always_inline from the original semantics "drop
inlining heuristics" into "be sure that result is inlined" w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106067
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80242
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66005
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, but please do it sooner than later, so there is enough time before 13.2rc
to note potential issues on the branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #94 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Alexander Klepikov from comment #92)
> I remembered why I used two different insns - first to eliminate infinite
> loop with help of marking insn with attribute, and second because I could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106971
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109009
--- Comment #8 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
(In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #7)
> There are a couple of issues in IRA:
>
> 1. In improve_allocation() routine, we are not considering save/restore cost
> of using a callee save reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110284
--- Comment #12 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 55391
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55391&action=edit
Proposed fix (addendum)
I wonder whether this modification to Jakub's patch might help?
m2/gm2-compiler-boot/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110376
Bug ID: 110376
Summary: Wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109689
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
An easy way would be to avoid unlooping if tree_ssa_loop_ch is executed in loop
closed ssa (which happens from ch_vect pass).
I wonder how hard would be however to get this right?
I think this means to take t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:370de1488a9a49956c47e5ec8c8f1489b4314a34
commit r14-2049-g370de1488a9a49956c47e5ec8c8f1489b4314a34
Author: Michael Meissner
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110377
Bug ID: 110377
Summary: Early VRP and IPA-PROP should work out value ranges
from __builtin_unreacahble
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110287
Bug 110287 depends on bug 110289, which changed state.
Bug 110289 Summary: Phiprop may be good idea in early opts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110289
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110289
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84110
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d877bf3bdf46b5c996505fc247d170e79fbfa4bf
commit r10-11461-gd877bf3bdf46b5c996505fc247d170e79fbfa4bf
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103664
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:364cb498c472790e14561f7672dc5ab4a987
commit r10-11462-g364cb498c472790e14561f7672dc5ab4a987
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106607
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fab3692a2cf961b7364d7f77dd976ba0e4f752b7
commit r10-11467-gfab3692a2cf961b7364d7f77dd976ba0e4f752b7
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102447
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c347b8d59958d5aa76c5fdcecd72478e08c5aa3
commit r10-11465-g4c347b8d59958d5aa76c5fdcecd72478e08c5aa3
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94540
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7dba69b5e9977408921c635681a0daa34b813e16
commit r10-11468-g7dba69b5e9977408921c635681a0daa34b813e16
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108118
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b272bc0fbf84454cae8c02e7404cfb23641380cd
commit r10-11469-gb272bc0fbf84454cae8c02e7404cfb23641380cd
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110378
Bug ID: 110378
Summary: SRA for destructors
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110378
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||109849
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84110
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.4|10.5
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103664
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.4|10.5
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102447
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.4|10.5
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106607
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.4|10.5
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94540
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.0|10.5
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108118
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.4|10.5
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110360
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d130ae8499e0c615e1636258d6901372316dfd93
commit r14-2050-gd130ae8499e0c615e1636258d6901372316dfd93
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc7f1bfbe5999e4639cf3f3afe70043b49352fdf
commit r13-7470-gdc7f1bfbe5999e4639cf3f3afe70043b49352fdf
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110102
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be1e122bd20c17aa0b57fc40cbd64f9e9a889aa2
commit r13-7471-gbe1e122bd20c17aa0b57fc40cbd64f9e9a889aa2
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55386|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110379
Bug ID: 110379
Summary: Unnecessary copies after early opts
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109456
--- Comment #12 from gccriscvuser at proton dot me ---
Updating the documentation is good, but there should also be an error
diagnostic, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110102
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78904
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #16)
> Just to warn people in advance, the test case pr78904-1b.c is expected to
> start FAILing with the commit of
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110380
Bug ID: 110380
Summary: [feature request] "-pg-constexpr=coverage-output" emit
coverage metrics for constexpr code evaluated at
compile time
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110381
Bug ID: 110381
Summary: Incorrect loop unrolling for structs of floating point
types
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110381
--- Comment #1 from Lennox Ho ---
This issues does not appear to reproduce with integer types, or if the members
are summed in the "natural" order - a => b => c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110239
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
==55393==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address
0x004c9324 at pc 0x00432970 bp 0x7ffe2c7fcf80 sp 0x7ffe2c7fcf78
READ of size 4 at 0x004c9324 thread T0
#0 0x43296f in std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110381
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110380
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
pg is not the correct option here as that is about using the Gprof profiling
which is different from gcov.
More likely the option will be named -fprofile-constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110379
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
IIRC this is needed for __builtin_object_size still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109009
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #8)
> However, while computing the save/restore cost, we are considering only the
> memory move cost but not the BB frequency. I think it is important to
> cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110379
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Plus this is basically the same as the following C code:
```
struct a
{
int t;
};
void foo (struct a *);
struct b
{
struct a f;
};
void test(struct b *t)
{
foo(&t->f);
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110381
--- Comment #3 from Lennox Ho ---
Thanks. -fno-tree-vectorize appears to fix GCC 12.1 at -O2.
Curious, why is -ftree-vectorize enabled at -O2 with GCC 12.1?
The documents say it's only turned on by default with -O3
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/proje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110340
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109009
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> Yes, you'll need to factor in the BB frequency. Since the save/restore code
> will go into (at this point modulo shrink-wrapping later) the prologue and
> epil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110381
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Lennox Ho from comment #3)
> Thanks. -fno-tree-vectorize appears to fix GCC 12.1 at -O2.
>
> Curious, why is -ftree-vectorize enabled at -O2 with GCC 12.1?
Yes see https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110254
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #0)
> But improve_allocation() can also choose a register that has not been
> assigned to a conflicting allocno, and also has not been assigned to any
> other a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110360
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, the testers show failures for the new testcase for the following cases:
x86 / -m32 / -O1 and higher,
Power9 BE, all optimization levels.
I can reproduce the case of x86 / -m32 / -O1 for th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110340
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69585
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96117
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69585
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steveire at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110360
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 55393
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55393&action=edit
Patch to truncate string argument longer than 1
This truncates the string to length 1 and appears
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110164
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13709b518aa9769ef427e48ce5c9583fbe098777
commit r14-2055-g13709b518aa9769ef427e48ce5c9583fbe098777
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110311
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |fortran
Keywords|wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110164
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110382
Bug ID: 110382
Summary: [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in
verify_ctor_sanity
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110382
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110381
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110383
Bug ID: 110383
Summary: Missed optimiztion: Default operator== with trivial
struct can be replaced with bcmp
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110383
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the replacement to memcmp is only valid if there is no padding bytes (or
bits) and if there only integer types.
Also branchless might not be faster depending on if the structure crosses a
cache line bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108953
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||madhur4127 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110311
--- Comment #12 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Any idea which commit could cause such an issue? At least I now understand that
in our program the random number object gets undefined and produces NaNs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 110376 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110376
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110384
Bug ID: 110384
Summary: Build of MinGW g++ 13.1.0 fails due to \r in
--print-multi-lib output.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110385
Bug ID: 110385
Summary: Build of MinGW g++ 13.1.0 fails due to absence of a
header file.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
