https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500
--- Comment #16 from R. Diez ---
I am slowly arriving at a different conclusion.
"struct __cxa_eh_globals" has neither a constructor nor a destructor. Its
members are pointers or integers, so GCC will not have automatically generated
any constr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32193
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107514
Bug ID: 107514
Summary: quick crash of gcc due to noexcept specification
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
Bug ID: 107515
Summary: MVE: Generic functions do not accept _Float16 scalars
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> This is due to the peephole2 added in r12-2640-gf7bf03cf69cc:
>
> ;; Eliminate a reg-reg mov by inverting the condition of a cmov (#2).
> ;; mov r2,r3; mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107514
--- Comment #1 from Janez Zemva ---
A working version:
https://wandbox.org/permlink/ki45SRwCNwuMRw7G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107510
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ams at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #36 from L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107510
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Stubbs :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f95e4eced20666a981881f76d66d997922648687
commit r13-3622-gf95e4eced20666a981881f76d66d997922648687
Author: Andrew Stubbs
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107510
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 107510, which changed state.
Bug 107510 Summary: gcc/config/gcn/gcn.cc:4930:9: style: Same expression on
both sides of '||'. [duplicateExpression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107510
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #39 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #38)
> Please see PR104688 . We got a response from Intel, where they guaranteed
> atomicity of certain 16-byte load instructions for Intel CPUs with AVX
> support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107513
--- Comment #5 from Roy Jacobson ---
I still think it might be good idea to introduce this for the sake of reducing
debug symbols size. I'm less interested in improving debug experience in this
case, but obviously any improvement to that is welc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41041
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-11-03
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41041
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
*** Bug 41040 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41040
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41041
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The difference with an explicit -fwide-exec-charset=UTF-32 seems to be the BOM.
It looks like the default is UTF-32LE, are you sure it's UCS4?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107516
Bug ID: 107516
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE with -fwide-exec-charset=latin1
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #40 from admin_public at liblfds dot org ---
On 03/11/2022 12:04, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #38 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Please see PR104688 . We got a response from Intel, where they guaranteed
> atomicity of cer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107516
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe a similar issue to PR 81050, i.e. Latin1 isn't valid as a wide charset.
In which case, we should give an error instead of ICE if possible.
Reduced to remove library headers and C++20 features:
tem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107511
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Sigh, this is what I get for using AC_CHECK_FUNCS(secure_getenv) instead of
writing my own check that would actually do the right thing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to R. Diez from comment #16)
> Therefore, variable "static __cxa_eh_globals eh_globals" in the past was
> already initialised before any users (probably because static memory being
> zeroed on s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107500
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482
--- Comment #5 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've bisected this issue to commit 86f0bef37378 ("re PR target/61578 (Code size
increase for ARM thumb compared to 4.8.x when compiling with -Os)")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 98895, which changed state.
Bug 98895 Summary: C++ module generates too many dead code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98895
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98895
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107517
Bug ID: 107517
Summary: [OpenMP][5.0] 'target update' with strides — for C/C++
and Fortran
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp, rej
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:553b1d3dd5b9253ebdf66ee3260c717d5b807dd1
commit r13-3624-g553b1d3dd5b9253ebdf66ee3260c717d5b807dd1
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 103600, which changed state.
Bug 103600 Summary: Cannot use typeid result in constant expressions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103600
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41041
Samuel Thibault changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107517
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106467
Bug 106467 depends on bug 106449, which changed state.
Bug 106449 Summary: ICE in #pragma omp parallel for simd since
r6-4544-ge01d41e553aae245
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106449
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107486
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5acc10a9ea66411e1712fabc94f9f29892b0d607
commit r13-3626-g5acc10a9ea66411e1712fabc94f9f29892b0d607
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107491
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Kulik ---
So, I tested it with the following simple change and it works nicely:
--- gcc-12.2.0/libgo/runtime/proc.c
+++ gcc-12.2.0/libgo/runtime/proc.c
@@ -798,7 +798,15 @@ runtime_malg(bool allocatestack, bool si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106003
Bug 106003 depends on bug 107486, which changed state.
Bug 107486 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE when pipe's argument is not a pointer
type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107486
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107486
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107233
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107235
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107491
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
If we use an environment variable, we should probably use the existing GODEBUG
variable.
Making the stack headroom large enough all the time should be possible. It
will burn a lot of memory on stacks bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107482
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|out-of-bounds heap access |[10/11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106316
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
I note that the OpenMP example document has a similar example at
https://github.com/OpenMP/examples-internal/pull/329
for OpenMP-Examples Issue https://github.com/OpenMP/spec/issues/3332
For that example,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35e8b889af144faad074c0fceed0390143ec37dd
commit r12-8890-g35e8b889af144faad074c0fceed0390143ec37dd
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 107404, which changed state.
Bug 107404 Summary: [12/13 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since
r12-6416-g037cc0b4a6646cc8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107404
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107245
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105545
--- Comment #9 from Peter Dimov ---
My Godbolt link above no longer reproduces the warning because of
https://github.com/boostorg/describe/commit/c8c46bfdf78022a8a7e9e06983d8b04ccb921991,
but this one does: https://godbolt.org/z/oT1M31osa.
Look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0b38e9fec71dc4cc5e99b1f0cb159c15a8da9ba
commit r13-3638-gc0b38e9fec71dc4cc5e99b1f0cb159c15a8da9ba
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102950
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107492
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 93413, which changed state.
Bug 93413 Summary: Defaulted constexpr Destructor not being found during
constant evaluation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93917
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
Bug 85316 depends on bug 99966, which changed state.
Bug 99966 Summary: Bounds check not eliminated by assert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99966
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
Bug 85316 depends on bug 93917, which changed state.
Bug 93917 Summary: VRP forgets range of value read from memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93917
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99966
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102650
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107179
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40c34beef620ed13c4113c893ed4335ccc1b8f92
commit r13-3641-g40c34beef620ed13c4113c893ed4335ccc1b8f92
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107488
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32a06ce38a38bf37db468f0e6c83520fcc221534
commit r13-3642-g32a06ce38a38bf37db468f0e6c83520fcc221534
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107488
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107518
Bug ID: 107518
Summary: -fmodule-ts crashes for #include
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107173
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||unlvsur at live dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 107518, which changed state.
Bug 107518 Summary: -fmodule-ts crashes for -E flag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107518
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107492
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I ... don't remember. It was needed to avoid some error, maybe from
std::visit(vis, var) of something like that. But either we never
added a test for it or something changed. I can't reproduce an error wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107519
Bug ID: 107519
Summary: internal compiler error: in get_partitioning_class, at
symtab.cc:2096
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602
--- Comment #22 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #21)
> However
> try_combine
> recog_for_combine
> recog_for_combine_1
> recog( )
>
> is failing and we get "Failed to recognize..."
False alar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107520
Bug ID: 107520
Summary: Optimize std::lerp(d, d, 0.5)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98712
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102490
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106602
--- Comment #23 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #20)
> Yea, I think so (3 shifts). Two for masking, one to put the bits in the
> right position. Then we just have to figure out how to combine the initial
> shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107521
Bug ID: 107521
Summary: clang rejects invalid code in libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107521
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The funny part is clang says:
implementation-defined whether distinct literals will have distinct addresses
In clang, the result of such a comparison is unspecified, so it is not
a constant expressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107521
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh the GCC front-end bug is already recorded as PR 70248 (see bug 70248 comment
#2).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107522
Bug ID: 107522
Summary: ICE in parameter_mapping_equivalent_p on trunk
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
81 matches
Mail list logo