https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107285
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107285
--- Comment #2 from Alexey ---
Well, currently
The code generation is just could be wrong.
If we use the example provided: we have to see or 13 or 60 in both cases.
We have to see same result from bar function and from the final result of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172
--- Comment #35 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 107269 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107269
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107271
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172
--- Comment #36 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 107273 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107275
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |avieira at gcc dot
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107286
Bug ID: 107286
Summary: gcc/value-range.cc:4027: range_tests_floats: FAIL:
ASSERT_TRUE ((real_isinf (&r0.lower_bound (), true)))
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 107274, which changed state.
Bug 107274 Summary: Incorrect -Wuninitialized on indexed initialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107274
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107279
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107285
--- Comment #3 from Alexey ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> That is just bogus expectation.
> __builtin_constant_p works that it has a cut-off after certain optimizations
> (for -O0 already very early), if optimizations before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799
--- Comment #17 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
I analysed the reduced test case specified in comment 15. In the .s file, the
callee decrements r1 by 224, ie, callee’s frame size is 224. But there is an
instruction in the callee that accesses into
4 gcc (trunk)" and "-O3 -Wall -Werror -pedantic" this
produces the following warning (see https://godbolt.org/z/qv3W8j44b):
In file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20221017/include/c++/13.0.0/iostream:41,
from :1:
In member function 'std::ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107288
Bug ID: 107288
Summary: Double-free of temporaries created in statement
following co_await
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107288
--- Comment #1 from Richard Hodges ---
Created attachment 53712
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53712&action=edit
.ii file as requested
Intermediate source file as required by submission guidelines (g-zipped)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107285
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No, the generated code is just fine.
At -O2, bar is inlined into main. So we have
unsigned int a = __builtin_constant_p (3) ? 13 : 60;
and 3 is constant.
In the out of line copy of bar, value1 is a function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799
--- Comment #18 from Surya Kumari Jangala ---
I git cloned and built flexiblas to see what is the frame size and what is the
assembly code generated for the flexiblas C wrapper routine for dgebal.
The important assembly code snippets for dgebal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107289
Bug ID: 107289
Summary: - -Wanayzer-null-dereference false positive with f =
*b
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107290
Bug ID: 107290
Summary: False positive -Wuninitialized with Eigen
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Li Shaohua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99394
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46a8e017d048ec3271bbb898942e3b166c4e8ff3
commit r13-3327-g46a8e017d048ec3271bbb898942e3b166c4e8ff3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99409
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46a8e017d048ec3271bbb898942e3b166c4e8ff3
commit r13-3327-g46a8e017d048ec3271bbb898942e3b166c4e8ff3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 99394, which changed state.
Bug 99394 Summary: s254 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99394
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 99409, which changed state.
Bug 99409 Summary: s252 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99409
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107275
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107248
--- Comment #10 from Dennis Borde ---
Much more important: Thanks for fixing it :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107257
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
With -fno-tree-slp-vectorize the failure goes away. diff in optimized:
__attribute__((noipa, noinline, noclone, no_icf))
void q ()
{
- [local count: 1073742492]:
- MEM [(int *)&d] = 183800210910307
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107291
Bug ID: 107291
Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in build_comparison_op, at
cp/method.cc:1461
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107290
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce this ICE w/ the current gcc 13.0.0 20221016 snapshot
(g:6366e3e8847af98d4728d55951534769d034d02a).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107265
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107276
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
Summary|ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107287
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
More reduced test-case:
template struct integral_constant {
static constexpr int value = __v;
};
template using __bool_constant = integral_constant<__v>;
template struct __conditional {
template usin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107292
Bug ID: 107292
Summary: no warning for unused std::error_code
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107271
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] ICE: in |[13 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107288
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-17
CC|
algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.0 20221017 (experimental) (GCC)
%
% gcc-tk -w -O0 a.c && ./a.out
1
% gcc-tk -w -Os a.c && ./a.out
0
% cat a.c
short a;
int b[1];
int c(int p) {
return (p < 0) ? 0 : 10 + ((p / 100 - 16) / 4);
}
void f(int n) {
while (1) {
int m = n;
wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107293
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong code at -Os on|Wrong code at -Os on
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107254
--- Comment #10 from bartoldeman at users dot sourceforge.net ---
Thanks for the fix! I can confirm that, when applied to 11.3 (with files
renamed from .cc to .c), it fixes the issue, and with it, thousands of test
failures in the reference LAPAC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106155
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106119
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106722
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
--- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha ---
I believe it won't hurt to add a testcase to the test suite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107294
Bug ID: 107294
Summary: Missed optimization: multiplying real with complex
number in Fortran (only)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105820
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #7)
> I believe it won't hurt to add a testcase to the test suite.
Sure, Aldy can you please do that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107208
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to vfdff from comment #3)
> it seems releted to targetm.calls.function_value called by assign_parms, who
> return different behaviour for MODE_COMPLEX_FLOAT and MODE_COMPLEX_INT. With
> the foll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
Bug ID: 107295
Summary: [13 Regression] Rejected code in libreoffice with -m32
since r13-3290-g98e341130f87984a
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107294
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and of course 0 * NaN also isn't 0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922
--- Comment #28 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8d5f3a1b5a5839cb1db57d6f6766469cc4f8747
commit r12-8835-ge8d5f3a1b5a5839cb1db57d6f6766469cc4f8747
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:641369e29f57c508e6316d5d221c1a92900163f9
commit r12-8836-g641369e29f57c508e6316d5d221c1a92900163f9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d282dd56275485a88e1fe9c4ae1939b62d23b20b
commit r12-8839-gd282dd56275485a88e1fe9c4ae1939b62d23b20b
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9f58edfc2ccb0fb3840751a2fb4268ce5dd9b3d
commit r12-8837-gb9f58edfc2ccb0fb3840751a2fb4268ce5dd9b3d
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107254
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe7d74313736b8e1c30812bc49419f419bdf1c53
commit r12-8841-gfe7d74313736b8e1c30812bc49419f419bdf1c53
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107212
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d127348d7711e148e5ddd205a8c3409b37fae64c
commit r12-8840-gd127348d7711e148e5ddd205a8c3409b37fae64c
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff0a274e5c3026b105c7f51126fa51f8178fa42c
commit r12-8838-gff0a274e5c3026b105c7f51126fa51f8178fa42c
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 107160, which changed state.
Bug 107160 Summary: [12 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes
verification failure in spec2006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 106922, which changed state.
Bug 106922 Summary: [12 Regression] Bogus uninitialized warning on
boost::optional<>>, missed FRE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is likely the
"There is one exception, pr68180.C looks like a bug in the patch which is
also present in the C FE (so I'd like to get it resolved incrementally
in both). Reduced testcase:
typedef float
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Do you have a reproducer?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107296
Bug ID: 107296
Summary: C++20 nested typename: non-template used as template,
need typename
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106189
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9124675d2771aaf573bfbbe237ab28030bf3115d
commit r11-10316-g9124675d2771aaf573bfbbe237ab28030bf3115d
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106934
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bb2560ae196df515cfea9161a27ee86a1594777
commit r11-10318-g2bb2560ae196df515cfea9161a27ee86a1594777
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106892
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4bcab0b622cf8f2b6aadd982155c7e2d37d5887
commit r11-10317-gd4bcab0b622cf8f2b6aadd982155c7e2d37d5887
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107263
--- Comment #2 from Jeff Muizelaar ---
Even for small arrays clang does a noticeably better job:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/4d3TjGazY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107286
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb1edef9f4dadeffa15fdfd2fb206d78027b7b32
commit r13-3335-gcb1edef9f4dadeffa15fdfd2fb206d78027b7b32
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106892
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.3.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107286
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Sure, sorry, I forgot to send it:
template struct VecHelper {
typedef T __attribute__((vector_size(sizeof(int V;
};
template using Vec = typename VecHelper::V;
template using V = Vec<4, T>;
using F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107296
--- Comment #1 from Tomáš K. ---
Created attachment 53715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53715&action=edit
output
Output of the gcc command mentioned above
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107297
Bug ID: 107297
Summary: Support markdown in bugzilla comments
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107297
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
