https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99409

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rgue...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46a8e017d048ec3271bbb898942e3b166c4e8ff3

commit r13-3327-g46a8e017d048ec3271bbb898942e3b166c4e8ff3
Author: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
Date:   Thu Oct 6 13:56:09 2022 +0200

    Vectorization of first-order recurrences

    The following picks up the prototype by Ju-Zhe Zhong for vectorizing
    first order recurrences.  That solves two TSVC missed optimization PRs.

    There's a new scalar cycle def kind, vect_first_order_recurrence
    and it's handling of the backedge value vectorization is complicated
    by the fact that the vectorized value isn't the PHI but instead
    a (series of) permute(s) shifting in the recurring value from the
    previous iteration.  I've implemented this by creating both the
    single vectorized PHI and the series of permutes when vectorizing
    the scalar PHI but leave the backedge values in both unassigned.
    The backedge values are (for the testcases) computed by a load
    which is also the place after which the permutes are inserted.
    That placement also restricts the cases we can handle (without
    resorting to code motion).

    I added both costing and SLP handling though SLP handling is
    restricted to the case where a single vectorized PHI is enough.

    Missing is epilogue handling - while prologue peeling would
    be handled transparently by adjusting iv_phi_p the epilogue
    case doesn't work with just inserting a scalar LC PHI since
    that a) keeps the scalar load live and b) that loads is the
    wrong one, it has to be the last, much like when we'd vectorize
    the LC PHI as live operation.  Unfortunately LIVE
    compute/analysis happens too early before we decide on
    peeling.  When using fully masked loop vectorization the
    vect-recurr-6.c works as expected though.

    I have tested this on x86_64 for now, but since epilogue
    handling is missing there's probably no practical cases.
    My prototype WHILE_ULT AVX512 patch can handle vect-recurr-6.c
    just fine but I didn't feel like running SPEC within SDE nor
    is the WHILE_ULT patch complete enough.

            PR tree-optimization/99409
            PR tree-optimization/99394
            * tree-vectorizer.h (vect_def_type::vect_first_order_recurrence):
Add.
            (stmt_vec_info_type::recurr_info_type): Likewise.
            (vectorizable_recurr): New function.
            * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_phi_first_order_recurrence_p): New
            function.
            (vect_analyze_scalar_cycles_1): Look for first order
            recurrences.
            (vect_analyze_loop_operations): Handle them.
            (vect_transform_loop): Likewise.
            (vectorizable_recurr): New function.
            (maybe_set_vectorized_backedge_value): Handle the backedge value
            setting in the first order recurrence PHI and the permutes.
            * tree-vect-stmts.cc (vect_analyze_stmt): Handle first order
            recurrences.
            (vect_transform_stmt): Likewise.
            (vect_is_simple_use): Likewise.
            (vect_is_simple_use): Likewise.
            * tree-vect-slp.cc (vect_get_and_check_slp_defs): Likewise.
            (vect_build_slp_tree_2): Likewise.
            (vect_schedule_scc): Handle the backedge value setting in the
            first order recurrence PHI and the permutes.

            * gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-1.c: New testcase.
            * gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-2.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-3.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-4.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-5.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-6.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s252.c: Un-XFAIL.
            * gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s254.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s291.c: Likewise.

    Co-authored-by: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>
  • [Bug tree-optimization/99409] s... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to