[Bug tree-optimization/104288] [11/12 Regression] EVRP null pointer check removal for strcmp (and maybe others) is not flow senative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 31 Jan 2022, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104288 > > --- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod --- > I'm contemplating the situation. The t

[Bug target/104298] [12 Regression] Broken cross compilers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104298 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/104303] [12 regression] gnatmake is miscompiled by IPA/modref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104303 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5

[Bug fortran/104313] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed with -ff2c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Priority|P3

[Bug target/104315] [AArch64] Failure to optimize 8-bit bitreverse pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104315 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- generalizing the bswap detection to track bits instead of bytes might be a way to handle this (there's the related issue of us failing to "copy propagate" bits with the associated possible simplifications o

[Bug tree-optimization/102950] [11/12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk&11.2.0 vs 10.3.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102950 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot com

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory since r10-653-g6c7ae8c56f9341f1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/104313] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed with -ff2c since r10-2279-ge0af8f52b10385d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/104320] New: Maybe a thinko in ctor_for_folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104320 Bug ID: 104320 Summary: Maybe a thinko in ctor_for_folding Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug ipa/104320] Maybe a thinko in ctor_for_folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104320 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/104321] New: Dead code since r12-4467-g64f9623765da33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104321 Bug ID: 104321 Summary: Dead code since r12-4467-g64f9623765da33 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/104321] Dead code since r12-4467-g64f9623765da33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104321 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-01 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvt change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 --- Comment #15 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- Testsuite is same as before the original patch now. Going to post a patch to the mailing list later.

[Bug fortran/104321] Dead code since r12-4467-g64f9623765da33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104321 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- I think it is not only dead code but it should be also removed: Glancing at the code, the 'data = NULL;' does not make sense (cf. 'memcpy(lhs, rhs)' above, lhs is data+offset) – and also does not match the

[Bug tree-optimization/104322] New: Dead code in gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104322 Bug ID: 104322 Summary: Dead code in gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiza

[Bug middle-end/95115] RISC-V 64: inf/inf division optimized out, invalid operation not raised

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95115 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34afa19d29c5bf0b0f504e4d0aca4e9a8bc82c5c commit r12-6959-g34afa19d29c5bf0b0f504e4d0aca4e9a8bc82c5c Author: Xi Ruoyao Date: Mon Jan 31

[Bug ipa/104320] Maybe a thinko in ctor_for_folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104320 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/104322] Dead code in gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104322 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org L

[Bug ipa/104320] Maybe a thinko in ctor_for_folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104320 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Greats, thanks.

[Bug demangler/99935] Stack exhaustion demangling rust mangled name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug demangler/98886] stack overflow in cxxfilt, demangle_type, rust-demangle.c:854

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98886 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/104049] [12 Regression] vec_select to subreg lowering causes superfluous moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104049 --- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > Hmm, > ;; _43 = .REDUC_PLUS (vect__7.11_47); > > (insn 23 22 24 (set (reg:V4SI 112) > (unspec:V4SI [ > (reg:V4SI 103 [ vect__7.11 ]) >

[Bug target/104323] New: [12 Regression] PCH (and maybe GC) of rs6000 builtins broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104323 Bug ID: 104323 Summary: [12 Regression] PCH (and maybe GC) of rs6000 builtins broken Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/104323] [12 Regression] PCH (and maybe GC) of rs6000 builtins broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Eve

[Bug target/104323] [12 Regression] PCH (and maybe GC) of rs6000 builtins broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104323 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Dunno how to test it in the testsuite though, --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/pr104323-1.c.jj2022-02-01 13:06:00.163192414 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pch/pr104323-1.c 2022-02-01 13:13:41.226712735

[Bug fortran/96122] Segfault when using finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3) > > (In reply to Andrew Benson from comment #2) > > > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > > > Confirmed

[Bug target/104323] [12 Regression] PCH (and maybe GC) of rs6000 builtins broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104323 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 52323 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52323&action=edit gcc12-pr104323.patch Untested fix.

[Bug preprocessor/78287] #line directive with value more than 2147483640 prints out the value twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78287 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Keywo

[Bug preprocessor/78287] #line directive with value more than 2147483640 prints out the value twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78287 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/69695] slice of an array retains pointer attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69695 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/101260] [10/11/12 Regression] regcprop: Determine subreg offset depending on endianness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101260 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9ebf6c330e24e886e7ce148e8c680c3e06c24dc commit r12-6960-gb9ebf6c330e24e886e7ce148e8c680c3e06c24dc Author: Andreas Krebbel Date

[Bug tree-optimization/71271] SLP loop vectorized twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71271 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/93534] Overload is probably ambiguous, but not ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93534 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Keywo

[Bug c++/86018] Incorrect unused warning for int passed by reference to lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86018 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug middle-end/54802] Trivial code changes result in different assembly with respect to rotations and bswap.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54802 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/77387] -Wstrict-overflow pessimizes VRP in some cases for ABS_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77387 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Resolut

[Bug c++/99811] ICE: tree check: accessed elt 2 of 'tree_vec' with 1 elts in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:13002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99811 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/60803] Trivial example of overloading in the presence of inheritance fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60803 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug c++/97453] Implement CWG issue 2303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97453 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.niebler at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/77792] Generic lamdba scope issue when working with list::remove_if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77792 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Keywo

[Bug middle-end/55217] False -Wstrict-overflow warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86341] Aggressive loop unrolling in gcc 7.x produces out-of-bounds index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86341 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Resolut

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 86341, which changed state. Bug 86341 Summary: Aggressive loop unrolling in gcc 7.x produces out-of-bounds index https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86341 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/70455] spurious "assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying conditional to constant [-Wstrict-overflow]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70455 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug debug/87772] Crash with variadic template, constexpr constructor for templated non-literal type, using declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87772 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/100527] ICE: Segmentation fault, flags_from_decl_or_type(tree_node const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100527 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory since r9-6321-g4716603bf875ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org Su

[Bug fortran/104311] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE out of memory since r9-6321-g4716603bf875ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > That is weird bisection, how could an OpenMP only change affect something > that isn't OpenMP related? > My bisection points to r9-6321-g4716603bf875ce > which ha

[Bug target/104324] New: v850-elf-as regression: displacement is too large

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104324 Bug ID: 104324 Summary: v850-elf-as regression: displacement is too large Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/104325] New: undefined reference to `virtual thunk to ...'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104325 Bug ID: 104325 Summary: undefined reference to `virtual thunk to ...' Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/104324] v850-elf-as regression: displacement is too large

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104324 --- Comment #1 from gcc-v850-bugs at engineer dot com --- The complete error messages (omitted -mv850es since "Error: unrecognized option -mv850es", included it erroneously above due to "This is an alias for the -mv850e1 option."). Also, v850 doe

[Bug c++/104325] [9/10/11/12 Regression] undefined reference to `virtual thunk to ...' since r9-4254-g12485662c00914ed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104325 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/70863] [F03] Finalization of array of derived type causes segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70863 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolutio

[Bug fortran/69298] [OOP] Array finalisers seem to be given the wrong array when the array is a member variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69298 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||weiqun.zhang at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 70863, which changed state. Bug 70863 Summary: [F03] Finalization of array of derived type causes segfault https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70863 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/104307] [11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -mavx512f -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104307 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9bf6d6b0e1d67df6dcee042fbe37ab72c3a38d7 commit r12-6962-ge9bf6d6b0e1d67df6dcee042fbe37ab72c3a38d7 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/104307] [11 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -mavx512f -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104307 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] |'-fc

[Bug tree-optimization/97821] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r6-3608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/87429] Strange overload resolution with decltype in template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87429 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|needs-bisection

[Bug c++/85493] decltype can use deleted constructor and deleted template function in template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85493 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/86430] ambiguous overload?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86430 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/97821] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r6-3608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 52325 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52325&action=edit somewhat reduced testcase Somewhat reduced testcase. Note there are uninit diagnostics because we jump into

[Bug c++/79493] Bad diagnostic when referring to inner type that does not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/104313] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed with -ff2c since r10-2279-ge0af8f52b10385d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc index 6493cc2f6b1..908a4c6d42e 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc @@ -6474,7 +6474,7 @@ gfc_ge

[Bug c++/64169] Partial template specialization of reference-qualified operator templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64169 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug c++/51501] [DR 1433] decltype over-agressive SFINAE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51501 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/67795] Wrong code generated for conditional expression with cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug c++/104008] [11/12 Regression] New g++ folly compile error with gcc 11.x. Bisected to PR99445 c++: Alias template in pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/104313] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed with -ff2c since r10-2279-ge0af8f52b10385d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 03:52:51PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 > > --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/79493] Bad diagnostic when referring to inner type that does not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/103771] [12 Regression] Missed vectorization under -mavx512f -mavx512vl after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771 --- Comment #34 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I've always wanted to see us be able to push something like those matched conversions down through the PHI. That would make the code look like: if (x.1_1 > 255) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV]

[Bug target/103771] [12 Regression] Missed vectorization under -mavx512f -mavx512vl after r12-5489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771 --- Comment #35 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #34) > I've always wanted to see us be able to push something like those matched > conversions down through the PHI. > > Is that what you're working on? Yes.

[Bug c++/104326] New: Deduction failure for parameter pack in template template non-type parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104326 Bug ID: 104326 Summary: Deduction failure for parameter pack in template template non-type parameter Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/104327] New: [12 Regression] Inlining error on s390x since r12-1039

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104327 Bug ID: 104327 Summary: [12 Regression] Inlining error on s390x since r12-1039 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/104327] [12 Regression] Inlining error on s390x since r12-1039

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104327 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/104326] Deduction failure for parameter pack in template template non-type parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104326 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think there is a c++ standard defect report about this case. The problem is the conversion of unsigned and long.

[Bug c++/56958] Spurious set but not used variable warning in empty pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56958 James Y Knight changed: What|Removed |Added CC||foom at fuhm dot net --- Comment #6 fro

[Bug c++/104326] Deduction failure for parameter pack in template template non-type parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104326 --- Comment #2 from Michael Colavita --- It doesn't appear to be specific to the long and unsigned case. The problem persists if you change unsigned to another type (or replace it with something like a member pointer). I can't find an accepted c

[Bug fortran/103828] Type generated for CHARACTER(C_CHAR), VALUE arguments is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103828 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #6) > Fixed in > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=906b4e15ce84790c7657405238d61358e0893676 should this get a note in the release notes due to b

[Bug c++/102123] [11/12 Regression] Internal Compiler Error occurs during template deduction in use with templates as template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102123 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 See Also|

[Bug target/104327] [12 Regression] Inlining error on s390x since r12-1039

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104327 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/33193] slopiness in __real/__imag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33193 --- Comment #11 from Chris Lattner --- Cool, thanks for tidying this up Andrew!

[Bug fortran/104328] New: ICE in resolve_omp_atomic, at fortran/openmp.cc:7760 (etc.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104328 Bug ID: 104328 Summary: ICE in resolve_omp_atomic, at fortran/openmp.cc:7760 (etc.) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/104329] New: [12 Regression] ICE in resolve_omp_atomic, at fortran/openmp.cc:7827 (etc.)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104329 Bug ID: 104329 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in resolve_omp_atomic, at fortran/openmp.cc:7827 (etc.) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/104330] New: ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.cc:8294

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104330 Bug ID: 104330 Summary: ICE in gfc_simplify_image_index, at fortran/simplify.cc:8294 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/104331] New: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_eoshift, at fortran/simplify.cc:2590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331 Bug ID: 104331 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_eoshift, at fortran/simplify.cc:2590 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/104332] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_symbol, at fortran/resolve.cc:15815

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104332 Bug ID: 104332 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_symbol, at fortran/resolve.cc:15815 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug fortran/104332] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_symbol, at fortran/resolve.cc:15815

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104332 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- Note that this addition gives an ICE down to at least r5 for some reasons : $ cat z3.f90 block data real, bind(c) :: a end block data

[Bug tree-optimization/104125] 531.deepsjeng_r regressed on Zen2 CPUs at -Ofast -march=native (without LTO) during GCC 12 development

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104125 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- Despite spending much more time on this than I wanted I was not able to find out anything really interesting. The functions that slowed down significantly is feval (FWIW, perf annotation points down to a co

[Bug fortran/104331] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_simplify_eoshift, at fortran/simplify.cc:2590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-01 C

[Bug lto/104333] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE with -flto -Wl,-plugin-opt=debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333 Bug ID: 104333 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE with -flto -Wl,-plugin-opt=debug Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug lto/104333] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -flto -Wl,-plugin-opt=debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/100428] [nvptx, GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-7.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 -foffload=nvptx-none -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100428 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:456de10c549379b74d4858f00d4b8817035a73fc commit r12-6967-g456de10c549379b74d4858f00d4b8817035a73fc Author: Tom de Vries Date: Sun

[Bug c++/104325] [9/10/11/12 Regression] undefined reference to `virtual thunk to ...' since r9-4254-g12485662c00914ed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104325 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101831] [11/12 Regression] Spurious maybe-uninitialized warning on std::array::size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101831 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/86430] ambiguous overload?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86430 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Alias|

[Bug fortran/104332] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in resolve_symbol, at fortran/resolve.cc:15815

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104332 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

  1   2   >