https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 03:52:51PM +0000, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 > > --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc > index 6493cc2f6b1..908a4c6d42e 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc > +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc > @@ -6474,7 +6474,7 @@ gfc_generate_return (void) > NULL_TREE, and a 'return' is generated without a variable. > The following generates a 'return __result_XXX' where XXX is > the function name. */ > - if (sym == sym->result && sym->attr.function) > + if (sym == sym->result && sym->attr.function && !flag_f2c) > { > result = gfc_get_fake_result_decl (sym, 0); > result = fold_build2_loc (input_location, MODIFY_EXPR, > Passes regression testing.
