https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Adding --enable-frame-pointer makes no difference. No change either adding
>
> --enable-large-address-aware --with-fpmath=sse --disable-sjlj-exceptions
> --enable-frame-pointer --disable-libada --enable-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
So to sum up, a SSA default def would have to be expanded to an explicit (zero)
initialization. I suppose memory doesn't have a NaT state so stack allocation
for locals doesn't have to change but decls eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #43 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #42)
> Is this just about parallelism bottlenecks for the main build target (e.g.
> just `make` or `make all`), or does it apply to other Makefile targets, too?
> (e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102497
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
@Martin: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102593
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102594
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|ICE in decay_conv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102595
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102596
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[10/11/12 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102621
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Summary|Dead Code Elim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Cesar Eduardo Barros from comment #0)
> When compiling:
> #include
> #define regparm __attribute__((regparm(3)))
> uint8_t a;
> uint16_t regparm fn(uint16_t b)
> { return (b & ~0xFF) | a; }
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102626
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-11
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vmakarov at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102654
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102626
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #18 from Alexander Monakov ---
>From my perspective, the main blocker for a nice and clean solution is lack of
"birth" statements on GIMPLE.
Without them, expansion to RTL would either need to insert initialization at
the top of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-11
Summary|[false d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102659
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
If you change the testcase as follows the issue pops up at plain -O2 as well
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr69760.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr69760.c
index 53733c7c6a4..47e01ae59bd 1006
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102668
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |bootstrap
Summary|AArch64 b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45223
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
But this but is about non-MEMs while the fixes were involving only memory ops
IIRC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #18)
> From my perspective, the main blocker for a nice and clean solution is lack
> of "birth" statements on GIMPLE.
They were not needed until now ;)
> Withou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4111b36079fed95b787fafeed1deaab2dedaf3db
commit r10-10177-g4111b36079fed95b787fafeed1deaab2dedaf3db
Author: Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.1
Summary|[9/10 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102626
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #3 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102646
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100912
Qiu Chaofan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qiu.chaofan at outlook dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102648
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|11.3
Summary|[12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102682
Bug ID: 102682
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in simplify_gen_subreg_concatn, at
lower-subreg.c:717
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102659
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51584
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51584&action=edit
patch I am testing
I'm testing this patch, hopefully without bad side-effects on SCEV/data-ref
analysis ... (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102656
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102657
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102662
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102663
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102677
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102682
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
Bug ID: 102683
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in
set_min_and_max_values_for_integral_type, at
stor-layout.c:2851
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
That likely means the target lacks an integer mode covering the mode of the
type to be initialized ... :/ I see the target only defines TFmode so
eventually
it has CTFmode but not OImode. We have
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47320
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. I've just reverted this fix as part of
r12-4268-gfec283b63d7f24f4c37792dd07ab1055186ba88f
The numeric limits specialization is defined unconditionally, so is correct
whether or not _GLIBCXX_USE_WCHAR_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, a riscv-linux cc1 ICEs with
> ./cc1 -quiet t.i -I include -O
: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0x132b5fa crash_signal
/home/rguenther/src/trunk/gcc/toplev.c:326
0x18e4864 riscv_sub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #21 from Óscar Fuentes ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #20)
> Weird, I don't have any dependency on the DLL for it:
>
> $ ldd t.exe
> ntdll.dll => /Windows/SYSTEM32/ntdll.dll (0x7ffc6556)
> ntdll.dll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62011
Ma Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||malincns at 163 dot com
--- Comment #18 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ---
> ldd does not list libstdc++.dll, but `Dependency Walker` lists both
> libstdc++.dll and libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll.
>
> Imports from libstdc++.dll:
>
> _ZTIi
> __cxa_allocate_exception
> __cxa_begin_catch
> __c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09a0affdb0598a54835ac4bb0dd6b54122c12916
commit r12-4319-g09a0affdb0598a54835ac4bb0dd6b54122c12916
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.0|11.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102684
Bug ID: 102684
Summary: [missed optimization] std::min_element /
ranges::min_element does not get optimized away with
std::gcd
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
--- Comment #5 from Qing Zhao ---
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> But we should avoid
> the .DEFERRED_INIT here. The GENERIC is
>
>struct C y;
> < (void) (y = n == 1 ? TARGET_EXPR : TARGET_EXPR {.c=__complex__ (3.0e+0, 3.0e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:338725652f84793805c55f08a7607c2f45d5512b
commit r12-4320-g338725652f84793805c55f08a7607c2f45d5512b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #23 from Óscar Fuentes ---
See http://88.17.68.234/clientes/gcc
It contains the gcc binary packages with debug info, plus packages for
dependencies (mpc/gmp/etc.)
It also contains the libstdc++ dll from 10.3 (the "working" one).
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102646
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> I think most of the regressions are fixed, we get even better numbers now.
Because we enabled vectorization. I would say they should still
reproduce with -fno-tree-vectorize, right?
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101480
--- Comment #21 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
Hi,
note that also tree-ssa-structalias has:
/* If the call is to a replaceable operator delete and results
from a delete expression as opposed to a direct call to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #24 from Óscar Fuentes ---
Sorry, I misread your message and now realized that you just wanted the
executable and its dependencies. They are now on the same URL. The 11.2
libstdc++ and libgcc dlls are built with debug info.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102646
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Most if not all the performance changes I've seen so far have been,
not due to the jump threader changes, but to the restrictions we've
put into place for jump threadable paths. Before, we used to thread
p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101853
--- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am still seeing these today with g:a40970cf043553f0ca09a3b7be1c5a949623d915,
r12-4318
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102643
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102643
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0de8c2f8104b74f46e63d0d5d7b9e8fd3f04bb98
commit r12-4323-g0de8c2f8104b74f46e63d0d5d7b9e8fd3f04bb98
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102681
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Simply initializing the variable as in the patch below avoids the warning. The
control flow in the code is sufficiently opaque to make it worthwhile from a
readability point irrespective of whether or not th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102643
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
Bug ID: 102685
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in
output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102686
Bug ID: 102686
Summary: [PDT] ICE in check_host_association, at
fortran/resolve.c:6055
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102649
--- Comment #2 from David Haufe ---
I had assumed this would be the response. Unfortunately the source code
involved is both large (1000+ object files in this build) and proprietary. The
behavior we see where if we roll forward GIT and rebuild,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102687
Bug ID: 102687
Summary: [12 Regression] bootstrap ICE in insert_access, at
ipa-modref-tree.h:582
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #44 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #43)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #42)
> > Is this just about parallelism bottlenecks for the main build target (e.g.
> > just `make` or `make all`), or do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102567
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
std::move_only_function is on trunk now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102688
Bug ID: 102688
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c fails after
r12-4288
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102667
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84088dc4bb6a546c896a068dc201463493babf43
commit r12-4325-g84088dc4bb6a546c896a068dc201463493babf43
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89927
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b6788f8c2748060d922cc22173ff7f8500917e9
commit r12-4326-g6b6788f8c2748060d922cc22173ff7f8500917e9
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102687
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Sorry, I accidentally commited an unrelated change I had in my tree.
I am testing
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-modref-tree.h b/gcc/ipa-modref-tree.h
index 52f225b1aae..9795e2b8405 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-modref-tree.h
++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102689
Bug ID: 102689
Summary: Segfault with RESHAPE of CLASS as actual argument
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102281
--- Comment #7 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> __builtin_clear_padding when folded emits a series of memory stores rather
> than BIT_INSERT_EXPR etc., so that wouldn't work.
> But, IMNSHO, -ftrivi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Gallager :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30cce6f65a77b8eaa22f3efff7f1ba54858106f9
commit r12-4331-g30cce6f65a77b8eaa22f3efff7f1ba54858106f9
Author: Eric Gallager
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56604
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
