https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102658
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please don't add xfails for regressions without referencing the bug that tracks
the underlying root cause.
Also, the target-specific conditionals in the xfails are going to be difficult
to maintain. We need a better solution than that. That said, it would seem
prudent to discuss such a large number of regressions with the author of the
affected features/warnings (yours truly in this case).
