[Bug libstdc++/97485] New: std::call_once crashes at runtime on glibc if not linked to libpthread:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97485 Bug ID: 97485 Summary: std::call_once crashes at runtime on glibc if not linked to libpthread: Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Eve

[Bug tree-optimization/97462] ICE in op1_range, at range-op.cc:1580 (-Os and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97462 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug libstdc++/97485] std::call_once crashes at runtime on glibc if not linked to libpthread: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error': what(): Unknown error -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97485 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Host||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --- Comment #1

[Bug c/97463] [11 Regression] ICE in warn_parm_ptrarray_mismatch on an incompatible function redeclaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, is the TOPN allocation strathegy configurable? I wonder whether we have to resort to an alternate allocation scheme (mmap/sbrk), avoiding libc? At least I don't see a good way to force the gcov alloca

[Bug tree-optimization/97466] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538 (at -O3) since r11-3998-g540d5f4f0215e1cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97466 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/97467] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:369 (-Os and above) since r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97467 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/97468] gcc crashes when using __may_alias__ attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97468 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug tree-optimization/97464] Missed redundant store optimization opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97464 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/97469] [11 Regression] __attribute__ ((__target__ ("..."))) resets -mcmodel= values, breaks grub compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97469 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/97466] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538 (at -O3) since r11-3998-g540d5f4f0215e1cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97466 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Summary|ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/97466] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538 (at -O3) since r11-3998-g540d5f4f0215e1cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97466 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/97485] std::call_once crashes at runtime on glibc if not linked to libpthread: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error': what(): Unknown error -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97485 --- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich --- AFAIU '-1' comes from https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=libgcc/gthr-posix.h;h=965247602acf11f81c5fa009c7ee48eb55cbacca;hb=HEAD#l696 696 static inline int 697 __gthread_once (__gthread_once_t

[Bug preprocessor/97471] [11 Regression] ICE on using function-like macro as a non function-like macro since r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97471 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug preprocessor/97471] [11 Regression] ICE on using function-like macro as a non function-like macro since r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97471 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug driver/97469] [11 Regression] __attribute__ ((__target__ ("..."))) resets -mcmodel= values, breaks grub compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97469 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/97472] [11 Regression] Another EVRP problem since r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97472 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/97468] gcc crashes when using __may_alias__ attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97468 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #2 from R

[Bug target/97469] [11 Regression] __attribute__ ((__target__ ("..."))) resets -mcmodel= values, breaks grub compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97469 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug c/97480] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97480 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-19 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97473] Spilled function parameters not aligned properly on multiple non-x86 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97473 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |target --- Comment #3 from Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/97474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] produces wrong code with references to another field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug gcov-profile/97483] [GCOV]gcov: internal compiler error: in handle_cycle, at gcov.c:627 happen which get code coverage with lcov.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97483 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/97483] [GCOV]gcov: internal compiler error: in handle_cycle, at gcov.c:627 happen which get code coverage with lcov.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97483 --- Comment #3 from ammy.yi --- We tried latest GCC with a different OS and cannot reproduce this issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/97474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] produces wrong code with references to another field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- OK, so the issue is that the C++ frontend marks 'this' as restrict which in turn means that no other pointer can alias it. For foo() GCC computes : _1 = MEM[(struct A &)a_7(D) clique 1 base 1].a; #

[Bug sanitizer/97478] Cross Build from windows to linux. It looks like the sys/timeb.h header file does not exist in latest glibc any more

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97478 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97477] g++ doesn't accept __restrict keyword inside array function parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97477 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #1 from Richa

[Bug tree-optimization/97480] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97480 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/97484] typedef conflict for "byte" in GCC11 for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97484 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/97467] [11 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:369 (-Os and above) since r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97467 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- Ranger can figure out that the RHS operand of a shift is a zero and feeds it to operator_lshift::op1_range, which then uses it to create a swapped [1,0] range. Testing the following patch: diff --git a/gcc

[Bug libstdc++/97484] typedef conflict for "byte" in GCC11 for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97484 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/97474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] produces wrong code with references to another field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/97474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] produces wrong code with references to another field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 49397 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49397&action=edit fix in points-to analysis So this fix would allow this case (and fix the C++ FEs using of restrict)

[Bug tree-optimization/97466] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538 (at -O3) since r11-3998-g540d5f4f0215e1cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97466 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 97480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/97480] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97480 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97466] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538 (at -O3) since r11-3998-g540d5f4f0215e1cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97466 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Meh, I didn't intend to commit this assert ...

[Bug tree-optimization/97486] New: [11 Regression] ICE in vect_create_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:4513 since r11-4005-g6c6e0cafa38cee83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97486 Bug ID: 97486 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in vect_create_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:4513 since r11-4005-g6c6e0cafa38cee83 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/97486] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_create_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:4513 since r11-4005-g6c6e0cafa38cee83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97486 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/97486] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_create_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:4513 since r11-4005-g6c6e0cafa38cee83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97486 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/66552] Missed optimization when shift amount is result of signed modulus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66552 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:222f312a773157f53396ba4cb287deb07f84cc34 commit r11-4033-g222f312a773157f53396ba4cb287deb07f84cc34 Author: guojiufu Date: Mon Oct 1

[Bug middle-end/97487] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_simple_binop, at optabs.c:939

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97487 Bug ID: 97487 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_simple_binop, at optabs.c:939 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/97466] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538 (at -O3) since r11-3998-g540d5f4f0215e1cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97466 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95f27849a580ac834d4f51a0642da9671f0a9dee commit r11-4034-g95f27849a580ac834d4f51a0642da9671f0a9dee Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97466] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538 (at -O3) since r11-3998-g540d5f4f0215e1cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97466 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/97467] [11 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:369 (-Os and above) since r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97467 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b80069c7e65a3ed60ee16deac4a450a9c32efa6 commit r11-4035-g5b80069c7e65a3ed60ee16deac4a450a9c32efa6 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug libstdc++/97484] typedef conflict for "byte" in GCC11 for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97484 --- Comment #3 from Brecht Sanders --- MinGW is pure C, so it doesn't use: using namespace std; But I do see Ninja doing this before including windows.h. However GCC 10 and older have no issue with this. What changed in GCC 11 to cause the issue

[Bug tree-optimization/97467] [11 Regression] ICE in verify_range, at value-range.cc:369 (-Os and above) since r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97467 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/97484] typedef conflict for "byte" in GCC11 for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97484 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #3) > MinGW is pure C, so it doesn't use: using namespace std; > But I do see Ninja doing this before including windows.h. Then it is Ninja that needs to be fixed. O

[Bug middle-end/97487] [10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_simple_binop, at optabs.c:939

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97487 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/97488] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in wi::set_bit_large)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97488 Bug ID: 97488 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in wi::set_bit_large) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-co

[Bug tree-optimization/80928] SLP vectorization does not handle induction in outer loop vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #27

[Bug libstdc++/97484] typedef conflict for "byte" in GCC11 for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97484 Brecht Sanders changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/97489] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in ana::supergraph::get_node_for_function_entry(function*) const)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97489 Bug ID: 97489 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in ana::supergraph::get_node_for_function_entry(function* ) const) Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/97488] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in wi::set_bit_large)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97488 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/97484] typedef conflict for "byte" in GCC11 for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97484 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug sanitizer/97490] New: [10/11 Regression] false-positive -Wstringop-overflow= with address sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97490 Bug ID: 97490 Summary: [10/11 Regression] false-positive -Wstringop-overflow= with address sanitizer Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/97486] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_create_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:4513 since r11-4005-g6c6e0cafa38cee83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97486 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/97486] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_create_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:4513 since r11-4005-g6c6e0cafa38cee83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97486 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:361c378dda1f17435ecc364ab246978784df2482 commit r11-4068-g361c378dda1f17435ecc364ab246978784df2482 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/97459] __uint128_t remainder for division by 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, can we use this for anything but modulo 3, or 5, or 17, or 257 (all of those have 2^32 mod N == 2^64 mod N == 2^128 mod N == 1), probably also keyed on the target having corresponding uaddv4_optab handler

[Bug target/97327] -mcpu=cortex-m55 warns without -mfloat-abi=hard or -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97327 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:634ee90804cae1e08c8e25913288e0ecf0a5ea0a commit r10-8911-g634ee90804cae1e08c8e25913288e0ecf0a5ea0a Author: Srinath P

[Bug preprocessor/97471] [11 Regression] ICE on using function-like macro as a non function-like macro since r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97471 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug sanitizer/97490] [10/11 Regression] false-positive -Wstringop-overflow= with address sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97490 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3

[Bug rtl-optimization/97459] __uint128_t remainder for division by 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- And perhaps for other (but constant and not power of two) modulos use that unsigned long long a; a = (n >> 96) * (unsigned long long) (((__uint128_t 1) << 96) % c); a += ((n >> 64) & 0xULL) * (u

[Bug analyzer/97489] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in ana::supergraph::get_node_for_function_entry(function*) const)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97489 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/97327] -mcpu=cortex-m55 warns without -mfloat-abi=hard or -march=armv8.1-m.main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97327 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/97490] [10/11 Regression] false-positive -Wstringop-overflow= with address sanitizer since r10-5451-gef29b12cfbb4979a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97490 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-19 Summary|[10/11 Regr

[Bug middle-end/97487] [10/11 Regression] ICE in expand_simple_binop, at optabs.c:939 since r10-1420-g744fd446c321f78f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97487 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10/11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug analyzer/97489] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in ana::supergraph::get_node_for_function_entry(function*) const) since r10-5950-g757bf1dff5e8cee3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97489 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80928] SLP vectorization does not handle induction in outer loop vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928 --- Comment #28 from Richard Biener --- Yes, the original issue is still present.

[Bug gcov-profile/91601] gcov: ICE in handle_cycle, at gcov.c:699 happen which get code coverage with lcov.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91601 --- Comment #18 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #17) > The algorithm is Donald B. Johnson's "Finding all the elementary circuits of > a directed graph" (1975). (Hawick and James's just implemented the same > algorithm

[Bug target/96682] Arm: Wrong code generated for MVE with -O1 and above optimization options.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96682 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/96683] Arm: MVE ACLE intrinsics vst1q_{s8|u8|s16|u16} is not supported by GCC.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96683 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/96684] arm: MVE intrinsics / __ARM_undef presence in f16 vector max routine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96684 SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- -fno-allow-store-data-races is fairly new option, previously it has been --param=allow-store-data-races=0 I have no idea how you've tried to add -save-temps, so can't answer why you get the error. What I was

[Bug tree-optimization/97488] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in wi::set_bit_large)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97488 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d2f4ffc97a8510e72a99ee106159aeae2627a42 commit r11-4070-g2d2f4ffc97a8510e72a99ee106159aeae2627a42 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97488] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in wi::set_bit_large)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97488 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #10 from Christophe Leroy --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > What I was suggesting is build with make V=1 and copy/paste the command line > used to compile a particular source file and append -save-temps to those > opti

[Bug tree-optimization/80928] SLP vectorization does not handle induction in outer loop vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928 --- Comment #29 from Richard Biener --- So a testcase for missed outer loop induction SLP (and nested cycle SLP) is for example int a[1024]; void foo (unsigned n) { for (int i = 0; i < 1020; i += 4) { int suma = a[i]; int sumb

[Bug fortran/97491] New: Wrong restriction for VALUE arguments of pure procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97491 Bug ID: 97491 Summary: Wrong restriction for VALUE arguments of pure procedures Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug libstdc++/97485] std::call_once crashes at runtime on glibc if not linked to libpthread: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error': what(): Unknown error -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97485 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Looks like a dup of PR 55394

[Bug c/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #11 from Christophe Leroy --- Created attachment 49398 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49398&action=edit Build of fs/pipe.o

[Bug c/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #12 from Christophe Leroy --- Created attachment 49399 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49399&action=edit pipe.s from build of fs/pipe.o fs/pipe.o includes an instance of get_order() allthouth get_order() is decla

[Bug c/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #13 from Christophe Leroy --- (In reply to Christophe Leroy from comment #10) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > > What I was suggesting is build with make V=1 and copy/paste the command line > > used to compile a particu

[Bug other/97492] New: arm cortex-m0+ or constant value can use adds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97492 Bug ID: 97492 Summary: arm cortex-m0+ or constant value can use adds Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ot

[Bug c++/97477] g++ doesn't accept __restrict keyword inside array function parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97477 --- Comment #2 from Dalon Work --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > IIRC restrict is not official C++ but I agree it should be accepted. You are correct, it is not official c++. g++ accepts and uses the '__restrict' keyword in c++

[Bug tree-optimization/97360] [11 Regression] ICE in range_on_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360 --- Comment #23 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22) > OK, so the fix here is quite obviously to simply drop the > build_distinct_type_copy calls: Thanks richi, I'll put the patch through a bootstrap/regtest cycle

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Hmm, is the TOPN allocation strathegy configurable? I wonder whether we have > to resort to an alternate allocation scheme (mmap/sbrk), avoiding libc? No. The o

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > No. The only thing we support is a recursive malloc as seen in: > ./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof-malloc.c > > It was added in g:bc2b1a232b1825b421a1aaa21a0865b2d1e4e08c as we use a > static

Re: [Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

> No. The only thing we support is a recursive malloc as seen in: > ./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof-malloc.c > > It was added in g:bc2b1a232b1825b421a1aaa21a0865b2d1e4e08c as we use a > statically allocated buffer when we recursively entry allocate_gcov_kvp. > > However this is d

[Bug c/97493] New: generate wrong code with "-Os -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97493 Bug ID: 97493 Summary: generate wrong code with "-Os -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers" Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/97493] generate wrong code with "-Os -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97493 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug analyzer/97489] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in ana::supergraph::get_node_for_function_entry(function*) const) since r10-5950-g757bf1dff5e8cee3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97489 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from David Malco

[Bug c++/97388] By-value function parameter changes are rolled back prior to destructor call during constant evaluation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97388 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7) > > No. The only thing we support is a recursive malloc as seen in: > > ./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof-malloc.c > > > > It was added in g:bc2b1a232b

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- > > They have the very same problem when I disable a statically pre-allocated > buffers with -mllvm -vp-static-alloc=0: > > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > 0x004014e6 in calloc

Re: [Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

> > They have the very same problem when I disable a statically pre-allocated > buffers with -mllvm -vp-static-alloc=0: > > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > 0x004014e6 in calloc (nmemb=1, size=8) at pr97461.c:103 > 103 if (malloc_depth != 0) __builtin_trap();

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- > Hmm, it seems to me that having some entries prealocated by default > would be way to avoid this problem in majority cases w/o having to > modify the upstream packages. I tend to the same. I'm going to pre

[Bug preprocessor/97471] [11 Regression] ICE on using function-like macro as a non function-like macro since r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97471 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49401 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49401&action=edit x86_64 pre-processed source file

  1   2   >