https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Hmm, it seems to me that having some entries prealocated by default > would be way to avoid this problem in majority cases w/o having to > modify the upstream packages. I tend to the same. I'm going to prepare a patch for it.