[Bug fortran/71723] [7/8/9 Regression] [F08] ICE on invalid pointer initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/89213] Optimize V2DI shifts by a constant on power8 & above systems.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89213 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- The vector shift sequence does not appear in Spec 2006 CPU compiled for power9. The vector shift sequence does appear 4 times in the 602_gcc_s benchmark, and once in the 683_imagick_s benchmark.

[Bug c/89211] [8/9 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89211 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/89212] [8/9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc at fold-const.c:2552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89212 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/89214] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1211 with -std=c++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89214 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority|P3

[Bug c++/89217] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected constructor, have error_mark in split_nonconstant_init_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89217 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug libstdc++/58142] _pthread_tsd_cleanup called before destructors are called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58142 --- Comment #10 from Ev Drikos --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > ... I'm not sure either. But I've confirmed in macOS (10.13) the following simple hack. If the routine that initialises the Emulated TLS created two keys and the

[Bug fortran/89219] New: [gfortran 7.3] compiler throws internal compiler error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219 Bug ID: 89219 Summary: [gfortran 7.3] compiler throws internal compiler error: segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug middle-end/89210] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have real_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5600

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89210 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 6 09:16:19 2019 New Revision: 268573 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268573&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/89210 * fold-const-call.c (fold_const_vec_co

[Bug c/89211] [8/9 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89211 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 6 09:17:55 2019 New Revision: 268574 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268574&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/89211 * c-parser.c (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): D

[Bug middle-end/89210] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have real_cst in to_wide, at tree.h:5600

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89210 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89211] [8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89211 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/89219] [gfortran 7.3] compiler throws internal compiler error: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Works for me with FSF 7.3.0 on x86_64-linux.

[Bug c++/89220] New: Inconsistent behaviour of class template type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89220 Bug ID: 89220 Summary: Inconsistent behaviour of class template type deduction Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/84201] 549.fotonik3d_r from SPEC2017 fails verification with recent Intel and AMD CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84201 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- If Martins bisection to power.fppized.o is correct you can bisect the loop via the vect_loop or vect_slp debug counters (or first try with just -fno-tree-{loop,slp}-vectorize to narrow down to loop vs. BB ve

[Bug tree-optimization/88074] [7/8/9 Regression] g++ hangs on math expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug c++/89220] Inconsistent behaviour of class template type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89220 --- Comment #1 from Matt A --- // ... but this compiles again auto z = ((Foo(123)))(0);

[Bug fortran/89219] ICE with derived type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89220] Inconsistent behaviour of class template type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89220 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Matt A from comment #0) > Interestingly with "-std=c++1y" both x and y fail to compile, which is at > least consistent (even if I'm not sure it's correct...) It's correct. -std=c++1y is a syno

[Bug c++/87709] c++17 class template argument deduction not working in a very specific case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at ookypooky dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/89220] Inconsistent behaviour of class template type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89220 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88415] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88415 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- For backport depends on some earlier change.

[Bug tree-optimization/88415] [7/8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88415 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/89221] New: --enable-frame-pointer does not work as intended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89221 Bug ID: 89221 Summary: --enable-frame-pointer does not work as intended Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ta

[Bug tree-optimization/89182] [8/9 Regression] [graphite] ICE in extract_affine, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89182 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 6 11:18:33 2019 New Revision: 268575 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268575&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-06 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/89182

[Bug tree-optimization/89182] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in extract_affine, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89182 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Summary|[8/9 Regression]

[Bug rtl-optimization/89154] 5% degradation of CPU2006 473.astar starting with r266305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89154 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- The r1 adjustment is establishing the stack frame. It needs to precede all stack accesses (not just those by the prologue saves!) We could separately wrap it, if that would help? You can then get mult

[Bug other/89222] New: [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 Bug ID: 89222 Summary: [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug other/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Larmour --- Created attachment 45617 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45617&action=edit Assembler file generated by GCC when compiled with -Os

[Bug target/89213] Optimize V2DI shifts by a constant on power8 & above systems.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89213 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- You could just do xxspltib xx,sh vsrad 2,2,xx (only the low 6 bits of the shift count are looked at, for 64-bit shifts, in all vector insns).

[Bug c++/84075] Template parameter not resolved: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::serialization::U’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075 Marc Schmitt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schmitt.marc at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/84075] Template parameter not resolved: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::serialization::U’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075 --- Comment #6 from Marc Schmitt --- Created attachment 45618 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45618&action=edit Reduced test case with eigen-only dependency

[Bug c++/84075] Template parameter not resolved: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::serialization::U’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075 --- Comment #7 from Marc Schmitt --- Created attachment 45619 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45619&action=edit Preprocessed test case with eigen-only dependency

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] New: internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 Bug ID: 89223 Summary: internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/89224] New: subscript of NEON intrinsic discards const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89224 Bug ID: 89224 Summary: subscript of NEON intrinsic discards const Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/89135] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimple_split_edge, at tree-cfg.c:2747

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89135 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 6 12:56:02 2019 New Revision: 268578 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268578&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/88903] [7 Regression] wrong-code with SLP vectorized shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88903 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 6 12:56:02 2019 New Revision: 268578 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268578&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-06 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug target/89213] Optimize V2DI shifts by a constant on power8 & above systems.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89213 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- Sure I could use XXSPLTIB all of the time if I limit the optimization to ISA 3.0 (power9). I was trying to add optimization for shift counts for 1..15 on ISA 2.07 (power8) as well, hence using VSPLTISW fo

[Bug sanitizer/89215] UBSAN leaks memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89215 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems to be upstream bug, also in asan etc., Demangle(name) in there doesn't really differentiate between cases where it allocated the memory or just returned the passed in string or did something else. E.g.

[Bug c++/84075] Template parameter not resolved: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::serialization::U’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84075 Christoph Hertzberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chtz at informatik dot uni-bremen.

[Bug c++/71302] [9 Regression] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: misleading caret location for pointer in function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71302 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug libstdc++/88749] [9 Regression] Failure while building libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/ops.cc on trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88749 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang --- Comment #

[Bug rtl-optimization/89225] New: [9 Regression] LRA hang on ppc64le compiling glibc starting with r268404

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89225 Bug ID: 89225 Summary: [9 Regression] LRA hang on ppc64le compiling glibc starting with r268404 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/89225] [9 Regression] LRA hang on ppc64le compiling glibc starting with r268404

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug sanitizer/89215] UBSAN leaks memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89215 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- E.g. the LLVM demangler even documents that leak: const char *DemangleCXXABI(const char *name) { // FIXME: __cxa_demangle aggressively insists on allocating memory. // There's not much we can do about tha

[Bug c++/89158] [8 Regression] by-value capture of ICE variable isn't an lvalue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89158 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Feb 6 15:26:24 2019 New Revision: 268580 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268580&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89158 - by-value capture of constexpr variable broken.

[Bug c++/89158] [8 Regression] by-value capture of ICE variable isn't an lvalue?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/89199] libgo intermittent testcase failures on ppc64le power9 after r268458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89199 boger at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Severity|normal

[Bug c++/88983] [7/8 Regression] ICE in label_matches, at cp/constexpr.c:4035

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88983 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Feb 6 15:29:14 2019 New Revision: 268581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268581&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/88983 - ICE with switch in constexpr function. *

[Bug c++/88983] [7 Regression] ICE in label_matches, at cp/constexpr.c:4035

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88983 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/89119] [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy with RANGE_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89119 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Feb 6 15:33:18 2019 New Revision: 268582 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268582&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89119 - ICE with value-initialization in template.

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/89119] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in tsubst_copy with RANGE_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89119 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89024] [7/8 Regression] ICE testing convertibility of incomplete enumeration types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89024 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Feb 6 15:36:20 2019 New Revision: 268583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268583&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89024 - ICE with incomplete enum type. * call.c

[Bug c++/89024] [7 Regression] ICE testing convertibility of incomplete enumeration types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89024 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88983] [7 Regression] ICE in label_matches, at cp/constexpr.c:4035

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88983 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84251] [8/9 Regression] Performance regression in gcc 8/9 when comparing floating point numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #10 f

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r210113. int_cst_value changed there: /* Make sure the sign-extended value will fit in a HOST_WIDE_INT. */ - gcc_assert (TREE_INT_CST_HIGH (x) == 0 - || TREE_INT_CST_HIGH (x) ==

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] [7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89225] [9 Regression] LRA hang on ppc64le compiling glibc starting with r268404

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89225 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov --- It seems my latest patch for PR87246 caused this: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=268404

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] [7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess either we should lower ARRAY_REF indexes with precisions higher than pointer precision to that smaller precision early (during gimplification e.g.?), though not really sure what effect would that have

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] [7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/88856] [8/9 Regression] gfortran producing wrong code with -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88856 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- What we could do there is remove the first of those two splitters, remove the && !dead_or_set_p (insn, operands[1]) test from the second, and add peephole2 that would transform (set (access part 1) (subre

[Bug target/88856] [8/9 Regression] gfortran producing wrong code with -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88856 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/89123] Too many go test failures on s390x-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89123 --- Comment #10 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- Created attachment 45621 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45621&action=edit Tentative patch for libgo on s390x I didn't manage to make much progress with analyzing the remain

[Bug target/89213] Optimize V2DI shifts by a constant on power8 & above systems.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89213 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- For 32-bit or smaller shifts you can use vspltisb always, or vspltis[hw] if you prefer. If generating code for ISA 2.07 (Power8) you don't have xxspltib but you do have vsld/vsrd/vsrad/vrld, hrm. You s

[Bug target/84201] 549.fotonik3d_r from SPEC2017 fails verification with recent Intel and AMD CPUs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84201 --- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > If Martins bisection to power.fppized.o is correct you can bisect the loop > via the vect_loop or vect_slp debug counters (or first try with just > -fno-tree-{loo

[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] [7/8 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/87871] [9 Regression] testcases fail after r265398 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 from Wil

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 6 17:25:26 2019 New Revision: 268586 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268586&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/89102 fix common_type<> and common_type specializations Thi

[Bug rtl-optimization/88596] [9 Regression] ICE: Maximum number of LRA assignment passes is achieved (30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88596 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89217] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected constructor, have error_mark in split_nonconstant_init_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89217 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Some sort of modification happens twice for the RANGE_FOR_EXPR. Originally we have {*((struct S *) this)->r} which should be turned to TARGET_EXPR r}> but we now reprocess this again and get bogus TARGET_EXP

[Bug target/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Not confirming since it is unclear even on what OS you are using this and what to look for (I don't see r5 set close to start of main etc.). That said, if hal_setjmp works similarly to setjmp, but you don't

[Bug c++/88049] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in lto_symtab_prevailing_virtual_decl at gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c:1075 since r231671

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88049 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > > > We ICE on the fact that _ZTV1aIN12_GLOBAL__N_11fEE which is vtable for > > > anonymous namespace type but it has EXTERNAL flag set. > > > > > > Jason, why this

[Bug target/84251] [8/9 Regression] Performance regression in gcc 8/9 when comparing floating point numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251 --- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Oh, DOM is too early, it's expansion that exposes the redundancies. Seems like CSE ought to be able to pick this up though.

[Bug target/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Larmour --- Thanks for the quick reply. (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Not confirming since it is unclear even on what OS you are using this It's an embedded OS, so from your point of view, it's essen

[Bug debug/87451] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87451 --- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Wed Feb 6 18:54:16 2019 New Revision: 268588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268588&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c with Solaris as (PR debug/87451) PR

[Bug target/89222] [7.x regression] ARM thumb-2 misoptimisation of func ptr call with -O2 or -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89222 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c++/89226] New: codegen for copying a 512-bit object fails to use avx instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89226 Bug ID: 89226 Summary: codegen for copying a 512-bit object fails to use avx instructions Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Minimal fix committed to trunk, with a complete fix posted to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00346.html for stage 1.

[Bug libstdc++/89102] 'common_type' of single abominable function should not have a nested typename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89102 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |8.3

[Bug c++/71302] [9 Regression] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: misleading caret location for pointer in function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71302 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Feb 6 19:44:52 2019 New Revision: 268589 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268589&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix locations in conversion_null_warnings (PR c++/71302) PR c++/71302

[Bug c++/71302] [9 Regression] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: misleading caret location for pointer in function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71302 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/89227] New: gotools test cmd/go fails with link error "call lacks nop, can't restore toc; recompile with -fPIC"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89227 Bug ID: 89227 Summary: gotools test cmd/go fails with link error "call lacks nop, can't restore toc; recompile with -fPIC" Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/89226] codegen for copying a 512-bit object fails to use avx instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89226 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- The optimized dump for copy1 looks like *to_2(D) = *from_3(D); so we get essentially memcpy, while copy2 has _4 = MEM[(const struct foo512 &)from_3(D)].a; MEM[(struct foo512 *)to_2(D)].a = _4; _5 = M

[Bug go/89227] gotools test cmd/go fails with link error "call lacks nop, can't restore toc; recompile with -fPIC"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89227 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Same as https://golang.org/issue/29046? I would bet that this has something to do with the fact that testenv.HasLink is inlinable. Something is wrong with the way that the frontend is passing the inlinab

[Bug target/89226] codegen for copying a 512-bit object fails to use avx instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89226 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is because in copy1 it is a normal memcpy expansion. And, the generic move_by_pieces case is done in preference to target specific one. In i386.h we have: /* Max number of bytes we can move from memory

[Bug fortran/71860] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE on pointing to null(mold), verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Wed Feb 6 20:34:42 2019 New Revision: 268590 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268590&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-06 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/71860 * gfortran

[Bug target/89226] codegen for copying a 512-bit object fails to use avx instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89226 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71860] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on pointing to null(mold), verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code | CC|

[Bug target/89226] codegen for copying a 512-bit object fails to use avx instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89226 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Maybe i386.c would need its own ix86_use_by_pieces_infrastructure_p target hook if the default wouldn't do the right thing with this. Maybe we'll need to split STORE_MAX_PIECES into separately overridable CL

[Bug go/89199] libgo regression in implementation of CompareAndSwap functions resulting in intermittent testcase failures on ppc64le power9 after r268458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89199 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Feb 6 20:46:00 2019 New Revision: 268591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268591&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/89199 sync/atomic: use strong form of atomic_comp

[Bug go/89199] libgo regression in implementation of CompareAndSwap functions resulting in intermittent testcase failures on ppc64le power9 after r268458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89199 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/89164] can construct vector with non-copyable-but-trivially-copyable elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89164 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug go/89227] gotools test cmd/go fails with link error "call lacks nop, can't restore toc; recompile with -fPIC"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89227 boger at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that the change was backported to gcc 8 (r268578) and the test case fails there now the same way.

[Bug target/89226] codegen for copying a 512-bit object fails to use avx instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89226 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Seems most of the *by_pieces code actually uses widest_int_mode_for_size > which already handles even the wider modes as long as they have a mov > instruction. With th

[Bug other/78063] libbacktrace fails to handle cross CU DW_AT_abstract_origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78063 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug tree-optimization/86020] [8 Regression] Performance regression in Eigen geometry.cpp test starting with r248334

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86020 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --

  1   2   >