https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88178
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
A quick smoke-test of the idea from Comment #3.
The following patch:
--cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 95abde95f89d..e126fdcb8480 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> Did this ever get taken to the ABI group?
I've done so now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88140
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88195
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86900
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] -gdwarf-5 |[8 Regression] -gdwarf-5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88214
Bug ID: 88214
Summary: ICE in bitmap_intersect_p() on 32-bit BE platforms
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88215
Bug ID: 88215
Summary: UBSAN: Internal compiler error with attribute(unused)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88216
Bug ID: 88216
Summary: ICE (-std=c++2a) in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at
cp/constexpr.c:4602
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52795
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88203
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88189
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Thanks, that looks nice. I was wondering if it was better to define a scalar
version of the insn or to expand to the vector version + many subregs, but the
scalar version (your patch) matches what we already do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217
Bug ID: 88217
Summary: [8/9 Regression] Compile time and memory hog w/ -O2
-fstrict-enums -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
++ CFLAGS='-O1 -ggdb'
CXXFLAGS='-O1 -ggdb'
Thread model: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20181127 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88215
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88218
Bug ID: 88218
Summary: Builtin for detecting that throw X will definitely
cause std::terminate
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88140
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
> diff --git a/gcc/tree.c b/gcc/tree.c
> index 39a92464414..a39e611292a 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree.c
> @@ -5201,6 +5201,15 @@ fld_process_array_type (tree t, tree t2, hash_map tree> *map,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88219
Bug ID: 88219
Summary: Precompiled headers Segmentation fault in Cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
ltrans files are 1374K without and 1339K with patch.
WPA report without patch:
[WPA] read 13690507 SCCs of average size 1.397311
[WPA] 19129895 tree bodies read in total
[WPA] tree SCC table: size 4194301,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88220
Bug ID: 88220
Summary: lto1: fatal error: Cgraph edge statement index out of
range
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88220
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88218
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88200
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88215
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88221
Bug ID: 88221
Summary: Only restricted set of balanced token sequences
allowed for attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88221
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On November 27, 2018 12:01:03 PM GMT+01:00, "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87988
>
>--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
>Hi,
>ltrans files are 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87589
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-10-08 00:00:00 |2018-11-27
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88216
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88214
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 45102
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45102&action=edit
simpler example of original failure, other failure modes added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88203
--- Comment #3 from Zbyszek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Note, in OpenMP 3.1 and earlier this would be actually valid:
> "Variables with const-qualified type having no mutable member are shared."
> and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ etc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88206
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88216
--- Comment #2 from emmanuel.le-tr...@cnrs-orleans.fr ---
Valid. This snippet compiles:
struct
T {};
template
struct
U {};
T t;
U u;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88222
Bug ID: 88222
Summary: ubsan error at cp/decl.c for broken code
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88222
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
Bug ID: 88223
Summary: Wrong code for intrinsic memmove
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #1 from Robert Clausecker ---
Created attachment 45104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45104&action=edit
Verbose compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87539
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems this has been fixed with the PR86687 fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88214
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88203
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88224
Bug ID: 88224
Summary: Wrong Cortex-R7 and Cortex-R8 FPU configuration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87386
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.3 |9.0
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87386
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88135
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84877
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87007
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Any progress here?
Please see [1].
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg00255.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88224
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88222
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r265636.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87007
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sorry for missing it, I was searching for the 87007 number on gcc-patches and
this thread doesn't have it in the subject.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88222
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88222
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Summary|ubsan error at cp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88122
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87214
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88225
Bug ID: 88225
Summary: Slowness in gcov
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88225
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
Leonard König changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leonard.r.koenig@googlemail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87157
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ struct test {
>
> extern struct test s;
>
> -int main1 ()
> +__attribute__((noipa)) int main1 ()
> {
>int i;
>
> We want to test the vectorizer behavior, not depend on how many ti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88188
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 27 15:40:57 2018
New Revision: 266515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266515&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/88188
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (print_operand) :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 27 15:49:43 2018
New Revision: 266516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266516&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/83173: Additional check before decrementing highest_lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88184
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
FWIW, I'm still unable to reproduce. Tried (non-)bootstrap + (non-)checking
builds but I get the output in Comment 2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87718
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 27 15:53:51 2018
New Revision: 266518
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266518&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/83173: New test
2018-11-27 Mike Gulick
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937
--- Comment #8 from Tomáš Trnka ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7)
> > Could you please kindly suggest what do I need to do to get this out of
> > WAITING? ...
>
> AFAIK you can do it yourself.
>
> WAITING is not a punishme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88225
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Patch candidate:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg02203.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
--- Comment #3 from Chris Wellons ---
This bug is still present in GCC 8.2.0. I just tested my example again on
x86-64, i686, and ARM64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83173
--- Comment #14 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 27 16:04:31 2018
New Revision: 266520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266520&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/83173: Enhance -fdump-internal-locations output
gcc/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> OK, sounds like it might be an unrelated issue to the one I'm seeing. The
> following variant of that test crashes for me as well, even though there
> aren't
> any allocatable character strings in i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88205
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86610
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226
Bug ID: 88226
Summary: missing warning on fprintf, fputs, and puts with an
unterminated array
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Nov 27 17:07:24 2018
New Revision: 266522
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266522&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 87756 - missing unterminated argument warning using address of a consta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87756
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Nov 27 17:07:24 2018
New Revision: 266522
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266522&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 87756 - missing unterminated argument warning using address of a consta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88211
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Nov 27 17:07:24 2018
New Revision: 266522
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266522&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 87756 - missing unterminated argument warning using address of a consta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88226
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88211
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88136
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88200
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
reproduced with r266507. The native x86_64-linux-gnu compiler is configured
with
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-9
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86205
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79351
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|WAITIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80467
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #8 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88227
Bug ID: 88227
Summary: ICE in gfc_convert_boz, at fortran/target-memory.c:788
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88228
Bug ID: 88228
Summary: ICE in check_null, at fortran/expr.c:2691
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
