https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88189
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Thanks, that looks nice. I was wondering if it was better to define a scalar version of the insn or to expand to the vector version + many subregs, but the scalar version (your patch) matches what we already do for and/or/xor, so that's good.
