Starting program:
/scratch/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20121024/build/gcc/jc1 /tmp/ccBOtnc2jx
-fhash-synchronization -fno-use-divide-subroutine -fuse-boehm-gc
-fnon-call-exceptions -fkeep-inline-functions -quiet -dumpbase ccBOtnc2jx
-mtune=generic -march=i686 -auxbase-strip gnu/java/awt/.libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-24
08:25:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > is this a bug in is_constructible?
> >
> > I don't think so. The implementation of the copy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-24 08:33:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> That seems inconsistent with 20.9.4.3/6
>
> the predicate condition for a template specialization is_constructible Args...> shall be satisfied if and on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-24
09:09:00 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 24 09:08:56 2012
New Revision: 192759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192759
Log:
PR debug/54828
* gimple.h (is_g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-24
09:10:38 UTC ---
Ah yes, you're right.
So to make the testcase compile (which it should) I'd need to use sfinae to
disable the container members, which means writing constraints based on
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55010
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-24
09:13:14 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 24 09:13:09 2012
New Revision: 192760
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192760
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/55010
* cse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|jaku
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #14 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-24 09:23:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> So to make the testcase compile (which it should) I'd need to use sfinae to
> disable the container members, which means writing constraints based on
> C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54347
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55047
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 09:45:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It seems likely a fallout of revision 191649 which introduced the assert
>
> gcc_assert (fsym->ts.u.derived == e-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54988
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-24
09:52:20 UTC ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
Bug #: 55049
Summary: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failed with
--with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-24
09:58:31 UTC ---
i re-check 192757
--enable-checking=release FAIL with
$ bash -x tf.sh
+ g++ -flto -fpreprocessed -c 1.ii -o 1.o
+ g++ -flto -O1 -fpreprocessed -c 2.ii -o 2.o
+ g++ -O
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-24
10:00:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix
> it.
> Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
> ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55044
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Bug #: 55050
Summary: Regression test failure slp-21.c on arm-linux-gnueabi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
Bug #: 55051
Summary: [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
Bug #: 55052
Summary: [4.8 regression] vect-widening tests are failing and
giving wrong results
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54982
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54472
--- Comment #6 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-10-24
11:09:49 UTC ---
Have you managed to check the patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-24
11:21:21 UTC ---
if the recent changes to unordered_set *didn't* break the printers that would
have been surprising ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-24
11:58:31 UTC ---
Yes ;) No idea what's going on with shared_ptr.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55053
Bug #: 55053
Summary: std::is_explicitly_convertible should be removed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55053
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55047
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 12:20:32 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 24 12:20:19 2012
New Revision: 192762
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192762
Log:
2012-10-24 Haakan Younes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55047
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-24
12:21:17 UTC ---
Fixed in mainline. A similar fix will go in 4_7-branch in a few days.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54721
--- Comment #2 from Mans Rullgard 2012-10-24 12:44:24
UTC ---
ARMv5T removed the need for most interworking with the addition of BLX and
interworking POP instructions. That said, even armv7 needs some interworking
code for a state-switchi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54980
--- Comment #10 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-10-24
12:50:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> This does not seem to reproduce for me. The following patch should however fix
> it.
> Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
> =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55014
SquallATF changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||squallatf at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54824
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2012-10-24
13:14:21 UTC ---
For example
Index: cfgexpand.c
===
--- cfgexpand.c (revision 192760)
+++ cfgexpand.c (working copy)
@@ -447
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55054
Bug #: 55054
Summary: -Wuninitialized warning in tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55054
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54473
--- Comment #1 from Mans Rullgard 2012-10-24 13:28:25
UTC ---
Confirmed with 4.6.3. No error with 4.5, 4.7, or 4.8.
The Linaro 4.6 branch does not have the problem either, so whatever they've
added seems to fix it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54473
Mans Rullgard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mans at mansr dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52855
Mans Rullgard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mans at mansr dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54902
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
que-object
--enable-linker-build-id --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-plugin
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-tune=generic
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20121024 (experimental) [trunk revision 192761] (GCC)
PASS -02
FAIL -O2 -ftree-vectorize
$ gcc -fpreproces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54902
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2012-10-24
13:58:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 28517
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28517
patch
Patch I am testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55014
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55032
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55014
--- Comment #4 from SquallATF 2012-10-24 14:06:29
UTC ---
may be this bus same as http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
there have a path in that post can solve this bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55054
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-10-24
14:14:35 UTC ---
Building with the host compiler? We generally don't fix warnings if they
are not really bugs for the host compiler ...
-24.
double f(double u) {
register double l = u;
return l + l;
}
PASS: gcc (GCC) 4.7.3 20121024 (prerelease)
<2><5d>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_variable)
<5e> DW_AT_name: l
<62> DW_AT_type: <0x6a>
<66> DW_AT_location
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55053
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54473
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55054
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2012-10-24
14:52:04 UTC ---
Ok, sorry. Then we should probably close this one as INVALID...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-linux-gnueabi
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55055
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52981
--- Comment #1 from Aaron S. Kurland 2012-10-24
15:22:28 UTC ---
I just realized that my original message was referring to the wrong option. I
meant: -Wpadded
I am therefore requesting two new options:
-Wpadded-element and -Wpadded-st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-24 15:23:19 UTC ---
-Og -g0 is a total failure of everything, such as:
-Breakpoint 2, func2 () at ./gdb.base/return.c:12
-12 return -5;
-(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/return.exp: continue to retur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 15:23:29 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:23:25 2012
New Revision: 192768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192768
Log:
2012-10-24 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55048
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-24
15:35:17 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:35:12 2012
New Revision: 192770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192770
Log:
2012-10-24 Vladimir Makarov
alt the storages of x, y and z overlap.
Notice that the problem is present only when calling alt through an
additional subroutine sub, as indicated by the comments.
gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.8.0 20121024 (experimental)
./test
All the following values should be 2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058
Bug #: 55058
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unexpected invalid type
conversion error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-24
15:40:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I think it is implementable (I have done something similar to ensure that my
> optional realizes the same effect), but the costs are not small:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55059
Bug #: 55059
Summary: DWARF missing concrete class definition
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber
2012-10-24 16:12:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> can you reduce it to get rid of all the code that doesn't affect the failure?
I already reduced it quite a lot, but I try harder tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
--- Comment #8 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2012-10-24
16:39:58 UTC ---
Romain, good analysis.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54030
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-10-24
16:55:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 28520
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28520
pr54030.diff tentative patch
The patch from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34892
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55049
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-24
17:35:50 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Oct 24 17:35:37 2012
New Revision: 192771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192771
Log:
2012-10-24 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-24
17:36:52 UTC ---
I have a better idea: specialize is_copy_constructible for each std::container
to depend on whether its value type is CopyInsertable into it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54030
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
Bug #: 55060
Summary: False un-initialized variable warnings
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #17 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-24 17:48:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > 1) It will prevent the incomplete type support
>
> Ouch... but not required by the standard.
I agree, but I consider that as a high price.
> > 2) Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Component|c
--tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/libbacktrace -I
../../gcc-4.8-20121024/libbacktrace/../include -I
../../gcc-4.8-20121024/libbacktrace/../libgcc -I ../libgcc -I ../gcc/include -I
../../gcc/include -funwind-tables -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54887
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Arnez 2012-10-24
17:51:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> <2><32e>: Abbrev Number: 27 (DW_TAG_lexical_block)
> <32f> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x400758
> <337> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x38 0x0
> <3><3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
17:52:30 UTC ---
Xcode 3.1.4
Component versions: DevToolsCore-1204.0; DevToolsSupport-1186.0
BuildVersion: 9M2809
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
17:54:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 28521
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28521
preprocessed source for libbacktrace/dwarf.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
17:55:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 28522
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28522
assembly file for libbacktrace/dwarf.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
--- Comment #2 from Han Shen 2012-10-24 17:55:40
UTC ---
Yeah, I think value of "i" is never used.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54887
--- Comment #6 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-24 17:56:32 UTC ---
I'll take a look at this case today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #18 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-24 18:12:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Looking at the concrete problem here I think the only thing that is needed
> is a conditional noexcept for all containers move constructors (which is
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55061
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-24
18:30:21 UTC ---
The testcase fails with the system compiler on powerpc-apple-darwin9, which
is...
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5493)
with the same error when compiled with '-funwind-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55028
--- Comment #3 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-10-24 18:36:44 UTC ---
Can this be debugged by hacking installed libstdc++ headers? If so, could you
point to what needs exporting/testing please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043
--- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-24
18:51:24 UTC ---
Essentially memory allocation is needed because that is the "simplest" state
for such containers, what the default constructor also does in other terms.
Given that the moved fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55048
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc -I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/.
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/../include
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I../../gcc-4.8-20121024/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber
-I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55063
Bug #: 55063
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Thousands of failures in the
libstdc++-v3 tests after revision 192739
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55060
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
