http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976
--- Comment #44 from Jiangning Liu 2012-02-24
08:09:25 UTC ---
I'm not sure if this kind of bug has been completely fixed, and posted a
qeustion in mail list at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-02/msg00415.html .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-24 08:38:19 UTC ---
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516
>
> --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-23
> 22:15:05 UT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-24
09:16:43 UTC ---
Well, that's sort-of expected ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-24
09:47:33 UTC ---
We fold end up trying to fold
(long int) &(*(a + 256))[0][0] - (long int) &(*a)[0][0] because a is of
type char[16][16] *.
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-24
10:35:32 UTC ---
Actually I have a simple patch that speeds things up a bit, but not
significantly
so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-24 10:43:02 UTC ---
> --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-24
> 10:35:32 UTC ---
> Actually I have a simple patch that speeds things up a bit, but not
> significantly
> so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-24
11:14:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 24 11:14:17 2012
New Revision: 184548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184548
Log:
2012-02-24 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52365
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369
Bug #: 52369
Summary: Const-qualified non-class base member and defaulted
default constructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52367
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-24
11:38:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 24 11:38:39 2012
New Revision: 184549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184549
Log:
2012-02-24 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52355
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46092
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52361
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-24
12:48:00 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 24 12:47:56 2012
New Revision: 184552
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184552
Log:
2012-02-24 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371
Bug #: 52371
Summary: [C++11] ICE in noexcept with constexpr conversion
function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371
--- Comment #1 from Ai Azuma 2012-02-24 13:54:18
UTC ---
Created attachment 26741
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26741
Output of -v option and preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52371
--- Comment #2 from Ai Azuma 2012-02-24 14:01:41
UTC ---
I'm sorry. I forgot to write that this ICE appears with -std=c++11 option.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Bur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52369
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-24
14:17:17 UTC ---
With 4.6.2 and -Wall gives the same as 4.7.0:
l.cc:4:13: warning: non-static const member 'const int B::v_' in class without
a constructor [-Wuninitialized]
l.cc: In function 'int m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461
--- Comment #13 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 15:21:20 UTC ---
Author: pmarlier
Date: Fri Feb 24 15:21:12 2012
New Revision: 184555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184555
Log:
2012-02-23 Patrick Marlier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #27 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-24 15:21:20 UTC ---
Author: pmarlier
Date: Fri Feb 24 15:21:12 2012
New Revision: 184555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184555
Log:
2012-02-23 Patrick Marlier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50580
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2012-02-24 15:52:09 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Feb 24 15:52:01 2012
New Revision: 184557
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184557
Log:
[testsuite] Skip gcc.target/mips/interrupt_handler-[23].
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50580
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-24
16:26:46 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Feb 24 16:26:35 2012
New Revision: 184559
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184559
Log:
PR target/52261
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_ou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372
Bug #: 52372
Summary: gcc.target/mips/mips16-attributes{,-4}.c SEGV in
dwf_regno
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|gcc.target/mips/mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52373
Bug #: 52373
Summary: template usage drops some checks on the accessibility
of a member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37272
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner 2012-02-24
16:42:37 UTC ---
This looks to be fixed, probably by Mike's fp convert changes from a while
back. I'm now seeing the following src code being generated:
fctidz 1,1
fcfid 1,1
blr
Can we c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52374
Bug #: 52374
Summary: [C++11] Fails to transform id-expression into
dependent base member access in lambda expression
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52373
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sylvestre at debian dot org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52374
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner
le use
inside main().
GCC version: g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 20120224 (experimental)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-24 18:32:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> It is fixed on hjl/x32/addr32, hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch and
> hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch+mx32 branches.
>
> The problem is
>
> ;; Stores and loads of ax to arbitr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2012-02-24 19:14:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
>
>
> But this is the _address_ that we are talking, see the "MEM" RTX. So,
> following
> (untested) patch can help - access is in PTR mode, and "a" modifier sho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52364
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-02-24 19:29:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I checked a similar fix into hjl/x32/addr32, hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch and
> hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch+mx32 branches. I also added "I" code to print
> constant ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
Bug #: 52375
Summary: [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
extract_insn, at recog.c:2123 at -O3 -mfpu=neon
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52376
Bug #: 52376
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in lto_input_tree_ref, at
lto-streamer-in.c:266 while linking LTO-PGO libxul
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52376
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-02-24 19:42:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 26745
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26745
nsXMLContentSink.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod 2012-02-24
19:47:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 26746
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26746
disable tests if no atomic support present
That test case really shouldn't be running. To make su
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52352
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2012-02-24 20:03:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
>
> > I checked a similar fix into hjl/x32/addr32, hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch and
> > hjl/x32/gcc-4_6-branch+mx32 branches. I also added "
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50349
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
Bernhard Rosenkränzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26744|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
Bernhard Rosenkränzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from Bernhar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52377
Bug #: 52377
Summary: C++11 non-static initializers in unions are not used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-25
02:23:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 26749
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26749
back port of thread_leak_test.c from ivmai-bdwgc-8b168d0
The random failures in testsuite/boehm-gc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-25
02:27:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Note that at r184560 with the back ported thread_leak_test.c changes applied, I
am able to run the 64-bit thread_leak_test test repeatedly without failures.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52378
Bug #: 52378
Summary: Can't build most recent svn version
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52378
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
56 matches
Mail list logo
