http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-02-24 08:38:19 UTC --- On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 > > --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-23 > 22:15:05 UTC --- > > > Maybe get away with these old-stylish names ('tree' and 'fold') and > > make it match reality, gimple-ssa-combine.c ;) > > That sounds like a good idea. I have done that. > > > > > Still have to have a look at your branch - do you have a brief > > overview documentation, for example on the wiki? What I'd like > > to do is have an interface that I can re-use for VN combining, > > basically replace its simplify_*_expression functions. > > I don't have one yet. But I hope to create one this weekend. > > Right now replacing the VN combining with this new functionality will not work > as it scans the defs itself. Though I am moving all the def scanning to its > own function which should allow for the code to be more modular and allow for > the VN combining to work with it. I think def scanning is ok, but all SSA names should be "valueized" via a hook first. Richard.
