[Bug libfortran/37634] Fix libgfortran compiling to support GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2010-01-09 Thread monaka at monami-software dot com
--- Comment #2 from monaka at monami-software dot com 2010-01-09 08:02 --- Created an attachment (id=19518) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19518&action=view) patch to configure.ac. Pls run autoconf after applied this patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b

[Bug libfortran/37634] Fix libgfortran compiling to support GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2010-01-09 Thread monaka at monami-software dot com
--- Comment #3 from monaka at monami-software dot com 2010-01-09 08:20 --- I attached 0001-Fix-libgfortran-compiling-to-support-GCC_NO_EXECUTAB.patch The code block was copied from libssp and it had a bug. It was fixed on libssp. But there is no apply to libgfortran. I've tested darwi

[Bug c/42668] New: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9314

2010-01-09 Thread jerstlouis at gmail dot com
Compile with -O2: Only happens with -fno-builtin-strcpy Seemingly related to Bug 42667. Looks like there is a problem with implicit builtin function declarations and the ternary operator : ?. warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘strcpy' -- unsigned int B

[Bug c/42668] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9314

2010-01-09 Thread jerstlouis at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from jerstlouis at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 08:29 --- Created an attachment (id=19519) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19519&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42668

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

2010-01-09 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 08:40 --- Created an attachment (id=19520) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19520&action=view) gzipped text oh my. it counts more than 65535.. [167929] and gzipped file exceed limit 1000k so i can't attach it at

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

2010-01-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 08:43 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=19520) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19520&action=view) [edit] > gzipped text > > oh my. it counts more than 65535.. [167929] !LOL! That's

[Bug c++/42669] New: libcpp: five redundant tests

2010-01-09 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just ran the most excellent sourceforge tool "cppcheck" over the source code of the GNU C compiler version 4.5 snapshot 20100107 and cppcheck said lots of things. An extract is below. [./libcpp/init.c:260]: (style) Redundant condition. It is safe to deallocate a NULL pointer [./libcpp/files.c:99

[Bug testsuite/42414] arbitrary path modification by a sed statement breaks testsuite if testsuite is in the absolute path

2010-01-09 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 08:59 --- Proposed patch at . -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/42628] [4.5 regression] ICE during bootstrap when compiling several libsupc++ files: original tree changed by fold

2010-01-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:06 --- Can you please provide exact command lines in order to reproduce the bug? --enable-checking=fold is not enabled by default and -O3 is also not default optimization flag for bootstrap. So, we need: - configure command - m

[Bug fortran/41298] wrong-code: Default initializer C_NULL_PTR ignored

2010-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 09:12 --- Subject: Bug 41298 Author: burnus Date: Sat Jan 9 09:11:53 2010 New Revision: 155755 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155755 Log: 2010-01-09 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/41298] wrong-code: Default initializer C_NULL_PTR ignored

2010-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 09:12 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.5). -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

2010-01-09 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:24 --- (From update of attachment 19520) oh my i ran objdump -t instead of objdump -p i'm sorry for this. -- jojelino at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

2010-01-09 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:26 --- Created an attachment (id=19521) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19521&action=view) undefined symbol list this is undefined symbol list when i link without --export-all-symbols when linking libgcj-no

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

2010-01-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 09:38 --- Ah. It's probably caused by --enable-java-awt. AWT isn't yet supported on cygwin yet; looks like it will need some adjustment to the way .o files are divided between the two dlls, most likely. Can you confirm wheth

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

2010-01-09 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:56 --- (In reply to comment #11) > Ah. It's probably caused by --enable-java-awt. AWT isn't yet supported on > cygwin yet; looks like it will need some adjustment to the way .o files are > divided between the two dlls, most l

[Bug preprocessor/42669] libcpp: five redundant tests

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 09:59 --- Didn't I tell you already that these issues are *not* suited for Bugzilla, because aren't user visible? Just mention the issue on gcc, or send a patch to gcc-patches. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com

[Bug other/42670] New: c++filt/nm --demangle doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol

2010-01-09 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/561150] $ echo _GLOBAL__I__Z10convertKeyPKc | c++filt global constructors keyed to _Z10convertKeyPKc $ echo _GLOBAL__I__Z10convertKeyPKc | c++filt | c++filt global constructors keyed to convertKey(char const*) -- Summary: c++filt/nm --demangle d

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

2010-01-09 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 10:08 --- Created an attachment (id=19522) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19522&action=view) hdrs (with --export-all-symbols) which i should have attached it counts 57439 whoa, what happens if total number of

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

2010-01-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 10:12 --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Ah. It's probably caused by --enable-java-awt. AWT isn't yet supported on > > cygwin yet; looks like it will need some adjustment to the way .o files are > >

[Bug other/42670] c++filt/nm --demangle doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 10:19 --- c++filt is part of binutils and indeed the PR is about binutils, thus doesn't belong here. If you have strong reasons to believe GCC is at fault, please explain and reopen. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle do

[Bug target/42671] New: Thumb2 generate more instructions than Thumb1 to load GOT address

2010-01-09 Thread carrot at google dot com
The simple test case is: extern int i; void foo(int j) { i = j; } Compile it with options -march=armv5te -mthumb -Os -fpic, gcc generates: foo: ldr r3, .L3 ldr r2, .L3+4 .LPIC0: add r3, pc// A ldr r3, [r3, r2] @ sp needed

[Bug c/42667] [4.4/4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in insert_into_preds_of_block, at tree-ssa-pre.c:3146

2010-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 11:25 --- Confirmed. We arrive at PRE with OnDisplay (char * string) { int D.1959; : if (string_2(D) == 0B) goto ; else goto ; : goto ; : : # string_1 = PHI D.1959_4 = strlen (string_1); WriteTextD

[Bug middle-end/42512] [4.5 Regression] integer wrong code bug with loop

2010-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 12:04 --- Subject: Bug 42512 Author: rguenth Date: Sat Jan 9 12:04:17 2010 New Revision: 155757 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155757 Log: 2010-01-09 Richard Guenther PR middle-end/42512

[Bug middle-end/42512] [4.5 Regression] integer wrong code bug with loop

2010-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 12:04 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug middle-end/42667] [4.4/4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in insert_into_preds_of_block, at tree-ssa-pre.c:3146

2010-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 12:07 --- Actually it might be subtly different. Yep, it's a bug in folding. Mine. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/11633] [DR 430] g++ does not initialize structures when auto-increment variables are used

2010-01-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 12:29 --- I can reproduce this bug with 2.95, but not with 3.4 or later. Closing as fixed. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/42655] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ! causes the qualified types for rvalue

2010-01-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug libgomp/42672] New: missing symbols in libgomp when linked with gold

2010-01-09 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
seen with 20100107, ix86, using gold from the 2.20 branch: - omp_destroy_l...@omp_3.0 4.4 - omp_destroy_lo...@omp_3.0 4.4 - omp_destroy_nest_l...@omp_3.0 4.4 - omp_destroy_nest_lo...@omp_3.0 4.4 - omp_init_l...@omp_3.0 4.4 - omp_init_lo...@omp_3.0 4.4 - omp_init_nest_l...@omp_3.0 4.4 - omp_init_ne

[Bug c++/33558] 'mutable' incorrectly accepted on reference members

2010-01-09 Thread gafunchal at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from gafunchal at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 14:18 --- Created an attachment (id=19523) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19523&action=view) patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33558

[Bug c++/33558] 'mutable' incorrectly accepted on reference members

2010-01-09 Thread gafunchal at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from gafunchal at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 14:18 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00420.html -- Giovanni -- gafunchal at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:40 --- Subject: Bug 42395 Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jan 9 14:40:40 2010 New Revision: 155761 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155761 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/42604 PR debug/42395 * tree-vect-loop-m

[Bug debug/42604] [4.5 Regression] VTA ICE in the vectorizer

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:40 --- Subject: Bug 42604 Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jan 9 14:40:40 2010 New Revision: 155761 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155761 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/42604 PR debug/42395 * tree-vect-loop-m

[Bug middle-end/42363] [4.5 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed for gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37913.c -O1 -g

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:41 --- Subject: Bug 42363 Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jan 9 14:40:59 2010 New Revision: 155762 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155762 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR middle-end/42363 * gimplify.c (gimplify_modif

[Bug debug/42629] "-fcompare-debug failure (length)" with "-O1 -fsched-pressure -fschedule-insns"

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:41 --- Subject: Bug 42629 Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jan 9 14:41:17 2010 New Revision: 155763 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155763 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/42629 * haifa-sched.c (dying_use_p): De

[Bug debug/42630] "-fcompare-debug failure (length)" with "-O1 -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -funroll-loops"

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:42 --- Subject: Bug 42630 Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jan 9 14:41:35 2010 New Revision: 155764 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155764 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/42630 * loop-unroll.c (referenced_in_on

[Bug rtl-optimization/42631] [4.5 Regression] "-fcompare-debug failure" with "-O1 -funroll-loops"

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:42 --- Subject: Bug 42631 Author: aoliva Date: Sat Jan 9 14:41:51 2010 New Revision: 155765 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155765 Log: gcc/ChangeLog: PR debug/42631 * web.c (union_defs): Add used a

[Bug rtl-optimization/42631] [4.5 Regression] "-fcompare-debug failure" with "-O1 -funroll-loops"

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:50 --- Fixed -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/42630] "-fcompare-debug failure (length)" with "-O1 -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -funroll-loops"

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:50 --- Fixed -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/42629] "-fcompare-debug failure (length)" with "-O1 -fsched-pressure -fschedule-insns"

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:51 --- Fixed -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/42363] [4.5 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed for gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37913.c -O1 -g

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:51 --- Fixed -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/42395] [4.5 Regression] "error: definition in block 12 does not dominate use in block 19" with -O3 -g

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:51 --- Fixed -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/42604] [4.5 Regression] VTA ICE in the vectorizer

2010-01-09 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 14:52 --- Fixed -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol

2010-01-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 16:23 --- libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected has --- --format=gnu-v3 --no-params _GLOBAL__I__Z2fnv global constructors keyed to _Z2fnv global constructors keyed to _Z2fnv --- Shouldn't it be global constructors keyed to

[Bug target/38697] gcc.target/arm/neon/neon.exp tests for vmov fail on arm-linux-eabi

2010-01-09 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 16:48 --- Patch submitted here. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00438.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38697

[Bug c++/42673] New: GLIBCXX_DEBUG off-by-one error for std::string operator[]

2010-01-09 Thread gccbug at oxyware dot com
#include int main() { std::string s = "foo"; s[3]; // doesn't throw and should } when compiled with g++ -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG doesn't throw but should. It does throw with s[4] and s[-1], however. test$ g++ -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG gccbug.cpp && ./a.out test$ g++ -v Using built-in specs. Targ

[Bug debug/42662] [4.5 Regression] invalid rtl sharing found in the insn

2010-01-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 17:25 --- Smaller testcase that ICEs at -g -O2: struct S { unsigned long s[17]; }; static inline void foo (struct S *r, struct S *a, unsigned n) { unsigned b = n / 8; r->s[0] = (b >= 1 ? : a->s[1 - b]); } static inline voi

[Bug fortran/42647] Missed initialization/dealloc of allocatable scalar DT with allocatable component

2010-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 17:34 --- Created an attachment (id=19524) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19524&action=view) Patch - fixes also use-assoc sllocatable scalars -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug fortran/32489] Endless loop when compiling - middle-end?

2010-01-09 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 17:47 --- Subject: Bug 32489 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 9 17:47:04 2010 New Revision: 155769 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155769 Log: 2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/20923

[Bug fortran/20923] gfortran slow for large array constructors

2010-01-09 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 17:47 --- Subject: Bug 20923 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 9 17:47:04 2010 New Revision: 155769 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155769 Log: 2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/20923

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructors symbol

2010-01-09 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-09 18:16 --- c++filt is part of the binutils, but it just runs the demangler which is part of gcc. Any change here will be a change to the demangler. -- ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Add

[Bug ada/42659] gnatmake thinks libraries aren't supported

2010-01-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 18:22 --- Subject: Bug 42659 Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Jan 9 18:21:52 2010 New Revision: 155771 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155771 Log: PR ada/42659 * configure.ac (powerpc|*86

[Bug ada/42659] gnatmake thinks libraries aren't supported

2010-01-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 18:27 --- Fixed in the upcoming 4.5 series. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/32489] Endless loop when compiling - middle-end?

2010-01-09 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 18:31 --- Subject: Bug 32489 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 9 18:31:00 2010 New Revision: 155772 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155772 Log: 2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/32489

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructor symbol

2010-01-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 18:43 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00446.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/32489] Endless loop when compiling - middle-end?

2010-01-09 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 19:01 --- Subject: Bug 32489 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 9 19:01:41 2010 New Revision: 155773 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155773 Log: 2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/32489

[Bug fortran/20923] gfortran slow for large array constructors

2010-01-09 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 19:01 --- Subject: Bug 20923 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jan 9 19:01:41 2010 New Revision: 155773 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155773 Log: 2010-01-09 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/32489

[Bug other/42670] demangler doesn't completely demangle a global constructor symbol

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 19:07 --- Oops, sorry, I stand corrected, needed some sleep... indeed, that reminds me... other/42230 !! ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42670

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 19:08 --- Maybe HJ is interested... -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42674] New: Bogus "no return statement in function returning non-void" warning

2010-01-09 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu dot org
Simple testcase not even worth attaching preprocessed source for, using h...@155680. Note that this only arises in C++, not when compiled as C: $ cat badwarn.cpp extern void bar (void); int foo (void) __attribute__ ((__nore

[Bug libstdc++/42673] GLIBCXX_DEBUG off-by-one error for std::string operator[]

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 19:15 --- This is intended. If you want to enforce that check use _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC additionally (the docs describe also the pedantic mode). And... always keep in mind that this is *free software* and our sources a

[Bug middle-end/42675] New: lto1 rejects -fdump-core option of gfortran

2010-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
If one tries to compile a simple Fortran file (e.g.: "end") with: $ gfortran -flto -fdump-core test.f90 lto1: error: unrecognized command line option "-fdump-core" -- Summary: lto1 rejects -fdump-core option of gfortran Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 St

[Bug c++/42634] ICE with -g -O2 -std=c++0x in copy_fn_p, at cp/decl.c:9973

2010-01-09 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 19:58 --- I posted a candidate patch to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00449.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42634

[Bug java/41745] Segmentation fault when ecj.jar is run as a binary compiled by gcj

2010-01-09 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 20:24 --- Hmmm, I need to find out first which of the many patches did solve the issue. After identifying I might do that. Let me start with a gcc44 build on my fbsd i386 box. -- andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed

[Bug c++/42639] ICE: copy_fn_p at cp/decl.c:9973

2010-01-09 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 20:20 --- On gcc revision r155766, I couldn't reproduce this PR by running this on (the bunziped version of) the attachment: ./cc1plus -quiet -std=gnu++0x -g -O2 multimap_text_fin_timing_large.ii It just completes fine for me.

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 20:32 --- Please provide a testcase. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/42662] [4.5 Regression] invalid rtl sharing found in the insn

2010-01-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 20:35 --- It is caused by revision 153037: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-10/msg00690.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug java/41745] Segmentation fault when ecj.jar is run as a binary compiled by gcj

2010-01-09 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #9 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2010-01-09 20:14 --- Excellent, thanks for the confirmation that this is fixed for GCC 4.5, Yuri. Andreas, would it make sense to bring your libffi fixes for FreeBSD to GCC 4.4 as well? Would you mind doing this? (Feel free to mark this as

[Bug middle-end/42674] [4.5 Regression] Bogus "no return statement in function returning non-void" warning

2010-01-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 20:51 --- I have in front of me the documentation in cxxabi.h and something like the below should pass, AFAICS: #include #include #include int main() { std::size_t length = 0; int cc; char* ret = abi::__cxa_d

[Bug c++/42639] ICE: copy_fn_p at cp/decl.c:9973

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 20:53 --- Well, Dodji, I just run make check-performance inside the build dir of the library (note, must be done after make check, there is nit in the Makefile, a missing dependency or something) and for sure it still fa

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #6 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-09 21:03 --- As far as I can see, that does pass. Note that the returned length is not the length of the demangled string, it is the length of the allocated buffer. That is, it may be larger than the length of the demangled string. --

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 21:04 --- Doesn't pass for me. I don't have a special setup, a current, widespread desktop Linux system. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42230

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #8 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-09 21:15 --- Oh sorry, I think the version I tested with was too old. I think this broke with Simon's patch of 2007-01-29. I bet this patch fixes it: Index: cp-demangle.c ==

[Bug libgcj/42676] New: [4.5 regression] javah doesn't generate the header files as checked in in the archive

2010-01-09 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2009-q4/msg00069.html and followup: These look like regressions to me. This one is obviously wrong, for example: Index: javax/xml/xpath/XPathFunctionResolver.h === --- javax/xml/xpath/XPathFunction

[Bug rtl-optimization/20070] If-conversion can't match equivalent code, and cross-jumping only works for literal matches

2010-01-09 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #31 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 21:27 --- Created an attachment (id=19525) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19525&action=view) Patch agains r155731, works pre-RA only Bootstrapped&tested on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu. -- http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 21:29 --- Thanks. The change would be also fully consistent with cplus_demangle_print. If regtesting is fine it almost qualifies as trivial, I would say... HJ, are you willing to prepare and test a complete patch? --

[Bug fortran/42647] Missed initialization/dealloc of allocatable scalar DT with allocatable component

2010-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 21:29 --- And of cause it still does not work: module m type st integer , alloc

[Bug fortran/42647] Missed initialization/dealloc of allocatable scalar DT with allocatable component

2010-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 21:30 --- use m type(t1) :: na1, a1, aa1(:) type(t2) :: na2, a2, aa2(:) type(t3) :: na3, a3, aa3(:) type(t4) :: na4, a4, aa4(:) allocatable :: a1, a2, a3, a4, aa1, aa2, aa3,aa4 if(allocated(a1)) call abort() if(allocated(a2))

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 21:54 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00458.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug ada/42626] gcc/ada/Makefile.in has missing quote

2010-01-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 22:13 --- Subject: Bug 42626 Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Jan 9 22:12:47 2010 New Revision: 155779 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155779 Log: PR ada/42626 * Makefile.in (gnatlib-shar

[Bug ada/42626] gcc/ada/Makefile.in has missing quote

2010-01-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 22:16 --- Subject: Bug 42626 Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Jan 9 22:16:43 2010 New Revision: 155780 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155780 Log: PR ada/42626 * gcc-interface/Makefile.in

[Bug middle-end/30905] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Fails to cross-jump

2010-01-09 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 22:17 --- In GCC 4.4 only one crossjump happens. The second crossjump does not happen because the basic blocks are not identical. The register allocator has not allocated the registers in the same way:

[Bug ada/42626] [4.5 regression] gcc-interface/Makefile.in has missing quote

2010-01-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 22:21 --- Thanks for fixing this. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #11 from ian at airs dot com 2010-01-09 22:33 --- The patch is OK if it passes testing. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42230

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last re

[Bug libstdc++/36022] stl templates exported as weak symbols though visibility hidden is used

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-09 22:56 --- I understand this can be closed as invalid, then. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/42353] [fortran-dev] Bogus Error: Name 'vtype$...' at (1) is an ambiguous reference ...

2010-01-09 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 23:11 --- Regressions on fortran-dev branch fixed. Committed revision 155778. Closing. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/42353] [fortran-dev] Bogus Error: Name 'vtype$...' at (1) is an ambiguous reference ...

2010-01-09 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #19 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-01-09 23:21 --- > Regressions on fortran-dev branch fixed. Due to the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-12/msg00232.html See the entry 2010-01-09 Janus Weil PR fortran/42353 * interface.c (gfc_compa

[Bug target/16634] arm-elf-gcc problems when generating code for __attribute__ ((interrupt ("IRQ")))

2010-01-09 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 23:27 --- The code generated on trunk, 4.4 and 4.3 with arm-eabi-gcc at O2 for the test in Comment #0 is int_handler: @ Interrupt Service Routine. @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0 @ frame_needed = 0

[Bug bootstrap/28615] cross-compile uses host cpp to determine features

2010-01-09 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 23:36 --- Is this still an issue ? -- ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/42677] New: [Regression] Bogus Error: Ambiguous interfaces '...' in intrinsic assignment operator

2010-01-09 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
Hi, the attached testcase works with gfortran 4.3.x and 4.4.x but fails with 4.5.0: gfcbug97.f90:34.15: use mod1 1 Error: Ambiguous interfaces 'assign_m' and 'assign_to_atm' in intrinsic assignment operator at (1) It also works with other compilers (ifort11, sunf95). Note

[Bug fortran/42677] [Regression] Bogus Error: Ambiguous interfaces '...' in intrinsic assignment operator

2010-01-09 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2010-01-09 23:47 --- Created an attachment (id=19526) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19526&action=view) The testcase. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42677

[Bug middle-end/42678] New: [4.5 Regression] ICE with lto1 in expand_mult, at expmed.c:3253

2010-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
The following program causes an ICE. With an older version of the 4.5 trunk it worked thus it is a true regression. $ gfortran -Wall -c -flto -O1 test.f $ ${PATH}/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/lto1 -o /dev/null ylm4.o Performing interprocedural optimizations Assembling functions:

[Bug middle-end/42678] [4.5 Regression] ICE with lto1 in expand_mult, at expmed.c:3253

2010-01-09 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42678

[Bug rtl-optimization/15482] can't find a register in class `GENERAL_REGS' while reloading `asm'

2010-01-09 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 23:59 --- void bar(int, int, int, int); Corrected testcase void bar (int, int , int); int x; int foo (int a1, int a2, int a3) { int b; __asm volatile("mov %0, #0":"=r" (b):: "r3", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7"

[Bug java/16132] Invalid double calculations on ARM (FPA)

2010-01-09 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-10 00:00 --- arm-linux only problems from Comment #3 . EABI targets should not have a problem . -- ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27308] Compiler generates incorrect code when calling a function with the result of an inline function as parameter

2010-01-09 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-10 00:12 --- Can't see this problem with -O2 on trunk , 4.3 branch and 4.4 branch. I tried with -mcpu=arm7tdmi -- ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-10 00:25 --- Subject: Bug 42230 Author: hjl Date: Sun Jan 10 00:24:52 2010 New Revision: 155785 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155785 Log: Return dgs.alc on success libiberty/ 2010-01-09 Ian Lance Taylor

[Bug other/42230] abi::__cxa_demangle fails to return the length of the decoded name

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #13 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-10 01:39 --- Fixed for 4.5.0. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/42194] performance degradation with STL complex convolution operation

2010-01-09 Thread jagjeet dot nain at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from jagjeet dot nain at gmail dot com 2010-01-10 05:54 --- Got the speedup improvement with fcx-limited-range flag. but got into another problem. This particular code when run on Sunx4100 server(with OpenSuse 10.1) shows unusual behavior. Different runs have different ru

  1   2   >