ARC's pending patches

2016-09-05 Thread Claudiu Zissulescu
Hi, Until GCC steering committee will take a decision about ARC's maintainer, please can any of the global reviewer review my pending ARC's patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01100.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01101.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche

Re: Testing _Complex varargs passing [was: Alpha, ABI change: pass SFmode and SCmode varargs by reference]

2016-09-05 Thread Joseph Myers
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote: > It looks that different handling of _Complex char, _Complex short and > _Complex float is there on purpose. Is (was?) there a limitation in a > c language standard that prevents passing of these arguments as > varargs? Well, ISO C doesn't define complex in

Re: ARC's pending patches

2016-09-05 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Hi Claudiu, On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote: > Until GCC steering committee will take a decision about ARC's > maintainer can you please share some more background on this? I do not recall any conversation around this at the steering committee. The GCC MAINTAINERS file still list

RE: ARC's pending patches

2016-09-05 Thread Claudiu Zissulescu
Hi, On the last GNU Cauldron, Joern notify us he want to stand off as an ARC maintainer, not giving a particular date though. He did review a number of patches in the beginning of this year, and after that he went silent. I tried to contact him directly on the subject, without success. Hence, I