Hi,

On the last GNU Cauldron, Joern notify us he want to stand off as an ARC 
maintainer, not giving a particular date though. He did review a number of 
patches in the beginning of this year, and after that he went silent. I tried 
to contact him directly on the subject, without success. Hence, I wrote an 
email to Richard Earnshaw expressing my concerns about ARC backend, as his name 
is in top of the global reviewers. He declined competency on the topic, and 
forwarded my email to GNU steering committee to solve the issue.

Please let me know if you need more info,
Claudiu


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 4:13 PM
> To: Claudiu Zissulescu <claudiu.zissule...@synopsys.com>; Joern Rennecke
> <g...@amylaar.uk>
> Cc: Francois Bedard <francois.bed...@synopsys.com>; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: ARC's pending patches
> 
> Hi Claudiu,
> 
> On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote:
> > Until GCC steering committee will take a decision about ARC's
> > maintainer
> 
> can you please share some more background on this?  I do not
> recall any conversation around this at the steering committee.
> 
> 
> The GCC MAINTAINERS file still lists
> 
>   arc port                Joern Rennecke          <g...@amylaar.uk>
> 
> and I am copying Jörn on this.  In my experience, the best
> way to get additional maintainers or have a replacement is
> for the (or a) current maintainer to nominate her.
> 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01100.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01101.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg02327.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01290.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02041.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02042.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02044.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00386.html
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00389.html
> 
> Gerald

Reply via email to