Hi Ilya,
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 20:52 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> clang complains:
>
> asm_newscn.c:48:22: error: field 'pattern' with variable sized type
> 'struct FillPattern' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension
> [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30084
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
Hi Ilya,
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 20:52 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> clang complains:
>
> readelf.c:12205:72: error: parameter 'desc' set but not used
> [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
> handle_bit_registers (const Ebl_Register_Location *regloc, const void
> *desc,
>
Hi Ilya,
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 20:52 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> By default, clang produces .llvm_addrsig sections [1]. The GNU
> toolchain does not know how to handle them yet [2], so just ask clang
> not to generate them for the time being.
>
> [1]
> https://llvm.org/docs/Extensions.html#
Hi Ilya,
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 20:52 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> __cxa_demangle is normally implemented in the C++ runtime library,
> instrumenting which for MSan is a hassle. Add a knob for disbling it.
Thanks for the fixes.
Pushed,
Mark
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich
> ---
> config
Hi Ilya,
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 20:52 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On the low level, they are the same as pointers.
Yes, I can see how that would work for return types.
Do you happen to have a testcase for this?
Right below this code is a check whether the type has a
DW_AT_byte_size, and if n
Hi Ilya,
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 13:22 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> If I build:
>
> const char *const apba__ __asm ("argp_program_bug_address") \
> __attribute__ ((used)) = "foobarbaz";
>
> with C and C++, the difference is going to be:
>
> @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
> .file "1.c"
> .text
A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-rawhide-x86_64 while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/140/builds/102
Build state: failed test (failure)
Revision: 2e7fbb96f578454ea80cf604b636155779eb03bf
Worker: bb1-2
Buil
Hi,
On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 14:20 +, builder--- via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-rawhide-x86_64 while
> building elfutils.
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/140/builds/102
>
> Build state:
A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-opensusetw-x86_64 while
building elfutils.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/88/builds/111
Build state: failed test (failure)
Revision: 0ffe2874e75d48cb88936e119e5284ff2bf664d9
Worker: bb3
Buil
On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 15:04 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 13:22 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > If I build:
> >
> > const char *const apba__ __asm ("argp_program_bug_address") \
> > __attribute__ ((used)) = "foobarbaz";
> >
> > with C and C++, the difference
On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 14:45 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 20:52 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > On the low level, they are the same as pointers.
>
> Yes, I can see how that would work for return types.
> Do you happen to have a testcase for this?
You can tri
12 matches
Mail list logo
