On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 14:45 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 20:52 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > On the low level, they are the same as pointers.
>
> Yes, I can see how that would work for return types.
> Do you happen to have a testcase for this?
You can trigger the issue by compiling the following:
$ cat 1.cpp
int &foo() { throw; }
int &&bar() { throw; }
$ g++ -g 1.cpp -c
and then running
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../libelf:../libdw ./funcretval -e 1.o
What would be a good way to integrate such a testcase?
Currently all tests are built with gcc, is it okay to add one
built with g++? If not, I guess the alternative would be to check in
multiple compressed object files built for different platforms?
> Right below this code is a check whether the type has a
> DW_AT_byte_size, and if not we'll assume 8 as (address) size if the
> type is either DW_TAG_pointer_type or DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type.
> Should the same be done for DW_TAG_reference_type and
> DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type?
Sounds reasonable. Here is what I have on x86_64:
<1><5a>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_reference_type)
<5b> DW_AT_byte_size : 8
<1><80>: Abbrev Number: 7 (DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type)
<81> DW_AT_byte_size : 8
IIUC these checks handle weird compilers that do not emit
DW_AT_byte_size.
> This doesn't seem x86_64 specific, other backends have similar code,
> I
> assume they all need a similar update?
Oh, right, this issue seems to affect all of them.
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > backends/x86_64_retval.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/backends/x86_64_retval.c b/backends/x86_64_retval.c
> > index f9114cb1..e668eacc 100644
> > --- a/backends/x86_64_retval.c
> > +++ b/backends/x86_64_retval.c
> > @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ x86_64_return_value_location (Dwarf_Die
> > *functypedie, const Dwarf_Op **locp)
> > case DW_TAG_enumeration_type:
> > case DW_TAG_pointer_type:
> > case DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type:
> > + case DW_TAG_reference_type:
> > + case DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type:
> > {
> > Dwarf_Attribute attr_mem;
> > if (dwarf_formudata (dwarf_attr_integrate (typedie,
> > DW_AT_byte_size,
>
