Re: QuerySet.values() Shallow Copy

2009-03-20 Thread Vitaly Peressada
@Malcolm: I agree with you that there are some holes in code - it was a quick hack to solve issue at hand. I did suspect that there should be some effort to implement this feature and tickets quoted confirm that. It is too bad that as of now it has not done yet even though tickets appear to be 2

Multiple admin forms

2009-03-20 Thread Dan Ward
Hello, I have a table, which contains three types of page. Each page has its own type of information. Up to now, all possible fields from the table have been displayed on an admin form and a drop down box provides the option to determine the type of page (page_type). Validation is carried out pe

[GSoC] Serialization Refactor

2009-03-20 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, I am a prospective GSoC student who is interested in working on Django this summer. I have fully read 2 the mails about GSoC(Malcolm's mail to a prospective student on django-gsoc list and Jacob's mail for all the prospective students on -devel list.) Thanks to both of you for such an in

Serving static files with handler-specific sendfile()

2009-03-20 Thread mrts
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2131 tracks adding support for efficiently serving files from within Django via handler-specific wrapper for sendfile(). A new response class, HttpResponseSendFile is added for that purpose. In my humble opinion it should visibly and loudly break if the handl

[GSOC] Multiple Database API proposal

2009-03-20 Thread Alex Gaynor
Hello all, To those who don't me I'm a freshman computer science student at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York. I'm on the mailing lists quite a bit so you may have seen me around. A Multiple Database API For Django == Django current has the low l

Re: [GSOC] Multiple Database API proposal

2009-03-20 Thread Tim Chase
> I'm here soliciting feedback on both the API, and any potential hurdles I > may have missed. While my vote may mean little, Alex has certainly been active and had quality code on the mailing list. MultiDB has also been a frequent issue on the mailing-list, so Alex gets my +1 I'd hope to see

Re: Patch status for ticket #9122

2009-03-20 Thread Preston Timmons
Thanks, Brian. I appreciate you putting time into that. The existing documentation explains the generic inline classes as behaving the same as the normal inlines. http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/admin/#using-generic-relations-as-an-inline Right above that is documented the norma

[GSoC] An Introduction about me

2009-03-20 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, This is an introduction about myself. Since Jacob said, "And if we don't know them at all, it's hard to trust they'll get things done." I am writing my involvement in Django and other FOSS communities in general here to let you all know something about me. Hope this helps you people to t

Re: Multiple admin forms

2009-03-20 Thread Collin Grady
Usage questions belong on the django-users mailing list. This list is for the development of django itself. -- Collin Grady --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this

[GSoC] Serialization Refactor

2009-03-20 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi all, I just wrote 2 mails about myself and my wish to participate in GSoC as a Django student. Sorry if I am spamming your inboxes. I just want to keep my mails short so people who don't want to read everything in there can skip the mails that are irrelevant to them. Please correct me where e

Re: Multiple admin forms

2009-03-20 Thread Stuart Jansen
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 10:55 -0700, Collin Grady wrote: > Usage questions belong on the django-users mailing list. This list is > for the development of django itself. So you're saying that what the original author wants to accomplish _is_ possible with the current Django admin? --~--~-

Re: Multiple admin forms

2009-03-20 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Stuart Jansen wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 10:55 -0700, Collin Grady wrote: > > Usage questions belong on the django-users mailing list. This list is > > for the development of django itself. > > So you're saying that what the original author wants to accompli

1.1 beta: Monday

2009-03-20 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Hi folks -- I met with James earlier and reviewed the outstanding list of stuff for 1.1 beta. We agreed it'd be best to give everyone -- me included :) -- a couple extra days, so we're going to push the 1.1 beta to Monday, probably around noon US Central time. Have a good, productive weekend, J

Re: Summer of Code: mentors wanted

2009-03-20 Thread Gary Wilson Jr.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > If you'd like to mentor a Summer of Code project, you can apply through > Google's web app right now. Please also add your name here: > http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/SummerOfCode2009 FYI, django mentor signup is here: http://socgh

Re: IPAddressField

2009-03-20 Thread pavel.schon
Hi, I'v written IPAddressField that stores IPy.IP instances. Look at http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1381/ and try it. Thanks for bugreports. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers"

Re: IPAddressField

2009-03-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:36 PM, pavel.schon wrote: > > Hi, I'v written IPAddressField that stores IPy.IP instances. Look at > http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1381/ and try it. Thanks for > bugreports. I'm afraid Oracle only supports 38 digits of precision for numeric columns. Since this

Re: Proposal: enable CSRF middleware by default

2009-03-20 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:03 PM, James Bennett wrote: > Too late now since it's already committed, but I've got some serious > reservations about this one. More development effort should have gone > into improving and refactoring the middleware before it got > automatically enabled. Hmm, yeah...

Re: QuerySet.values() Shallow Copy

2009-03-20 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 05:08 -0700, Vitaly Peressada wrote: > @Malcolm: > > I agree with you that there are some holes in code - it was a quick > hack to solve issue at hand. I did suspect that there should be some > effort to implement this feature and tickets quoted confirm that. It > is too bad

Re: [GSOC] Multiple Database API proposal

2009-03-20 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 09:45 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote: > Hello all, > > To those who don't me I'm a freshman computer science student at > Rensselaer > Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York. I'm on the mailing lists > quite a bit > so you may have seen me around. > > A Multiple Database API

Re: IPAddressField

2009-03-20 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:18 +0100, Gregor Kling wrote: [...] > Generally i do agree with the *usefulness* of not breaking compatibiltiy. > But on the other hand, I think that correcting this weird handling of IP > addresses would legitimate the cut. > Because the handling of IP addresses is not t

[Fwd: Re: [GSoC] Serialization Refactor]

2009-03-20 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
Whoops... hadn't noticed this was sent to multiple lists, so only replied to the first one. Sending my technical discussion reply to django-dev, since that's where the main audience participation is likely to be. Forwarded Message From: Malcolm Tredinnick Reply-to: django-g...

Re: [GSOC] Multiple Database API proposal

2009-03-20 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick < malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 09:45 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > To those who don't me I'm a freshman computer science student at > > Rensselaer > > Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York. I'm

Re: [GSOC] Multiple Database API proposal

2009-03-20 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
Trimming unused portions of the response to make it readable (which I should have done the first time around, too)... On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 23:41 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-03-20 at

Re: [GSOC] Multiple Database API proposal

2009-03-20 Thread Alex Gaynor
> > > One suggestion Eric Florenzano had was that we go above and beyond > > just storing the methods and parameters, we don't even excecute them > > at all until absolutely necessary. > > Excuse me for a moment whilst I add Eric to a special list I've been > keeping. He's trying to make trouble. >

Re: [GSoC] Serialization Refactor

2009-03-20 Thread Madhusudan C.S
Hi Malcolm and all, On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick < malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote: > > > I want to work on Serialization Refactor for GSoC. Since what > > the Django community requires exactly from that idea is still > > not clear to me, I am requesting any of you to expla

Re: [GSOC] Multiple Database API proposal

2009-03-20 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 00:41 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > > > One suggestion Eric Florenzano had was that we go above and > beyond > > just storing the methods and parameters, we don't even > excecute them > > at all until absolutely necessary. >

Re: [GSOC] Multiple Database API proposal

2009-03-20 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick < malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 00:41 -0400, Alex Gaynor wrote: > > > > > > > One suggestion Eric Florenzano had was that we go above and > > beyond > > > just storing the methods and parameter