Thanks, Brian. I appreciate you putting time into that. The existing documentation explains the generic inline classes as behaving the same as the normal inlines. http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/admin/#using-generic-relations-as-an-inline
Right above that is documented the normal inline options. http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/admin/#inlinemodeladmin-options I thought I would mention that because it seems like a feature is already documented as working. Preston On Mar 19, 8:54 pm, Brian Rosner <bros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 19, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Preston Timmons wrote: > > > Might somebody be able to review the patch and tests for this ticket > > to see if they are acceptable? I am hoping it can get in as a bug fix > > for 1.1. If something is lacking here I would like to try to fix it. > > The patch looks generally acceptable. I'd like to see some > documentation on it. I will definitely review this in time for 1.1. > Thanks for the heads up. > > Brian Rosnerhttp://oebfare.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---