https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
--- Comment #2 from David Scourfield ---
Sure, something like: slf4j-taglib-*.jar
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
Author: violetagg
Date: Fri Apr 1 10:21:15 2016
New Revision: 1737339
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737339&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
slf4j-taglib*.jar should not be excluded from the standard JAR scanning by
default.
Modified:
tomcat/tru
Author: violetagg
Date: Fri Apr 1 10:23:25 2016
New Revision: 1737340
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737340&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
Merged revision 1737339 from tomcat/trunk:
slf4j-taglib*.jar should not be excluded from the standard JAR scan
Author: violetagg
Date: Fri Apr 1 10:25:04 2016
New Revision: 1737341
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737341&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
Merged revision 1737339 from tomcat/trunk:
slf4j-taglib*.jar should not be excluded from the standard JAR scan
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
Violeta Georgieva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Author: olamy
Date: Fri Apr 1 11:28:13 2016
New Revision: 1737347
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737347&view=rev
Log:
fix https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/12
Signed-off-by: olivier lamy
Modified:
tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat6-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/ap
Author: olamy
Date: Fri Apr 1 11:28:18 2016
New Revision: 1737348
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737348&view=rev
Log:
executable war: Bind Tomcat to an address via command-line option #15
Merged pr https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/15
Signed-off-by: olivier lamy
Modif
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/12
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user seanking closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/15
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261
Bug ID: 59261
Summary: Request getAsyncContext should throw
IllegalStateException if async is not started
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.33
Hardware: PC
O
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261
--- Comment #1 from Rob Winch ---
I messed up the description some. Sorry about that. It should read:
If ServletRequest.getAsyncContext() is invoked and has not been put into
asynchronous mode an IllegalStateException should be thrown.
--
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
Maybe that is what the specification says, but using null in this situation is
considerably better than using an ISE which should be reserved for some
invalid/meaningless situations.
Bad design ! [being p
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59253
--- Comment #2 from jfclere ---
32, 104 and 113 are errno on linux
#define EPIPE 32 /* Broken pipe */
#define ECONNRESET 104 /* Connection reset by peer */
#define EHOSTUNREACH113 /* No route to host */
--
You are receiving this m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59253
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
Severity|normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59253
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Read/Write errors |IOExceptions in websockets
--
You ar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56126
--- Comment #7 from mda...@emergencycallworx.com
---
We are using spring-instrumentation on load using
spring-instrument-tomcat-4.2.4
Based on what I'm reading, TomcatInstrumentableClassLoader is no longer
required in context.xml.
However up
I ran the Tomcat 9 unit tests and there are a whole bunch of failures
(everything passed with the previous ea release). It looks like some of
our memory leak prevention tricks no longer work. That probably means we
either need to find a way around the new Java 9 restrictions or we need
to raise bug
Author: mgrigorov
Date: Fri Apr 1 20:01:53 2016
New Revision: 1737428
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737428&view=rev
Log:
s/8.0/8.5/ in links text
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-8.5-doc/building.html
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-8.5-doc/building.html
URL:
http:
Hi,
Does anyone know what is the reason for the missing -SNAPSHOT builds at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomcat/tomcat-catalina/
(RAO) ?
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/maven-jars.html says that the
snapshots should be at
http://people.apache.or
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know what is the reason for the missing -SNAPSHOT builds at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomcat/tomcat-catalina/
> (RAO) ?
>
> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/maven-
20 matches
Mail list logo
