https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50819
Summary: Standard context is stopped BEFORE requesting session
serialization
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.32
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
On 21/02/2011 17:33, Tim Funk wrote:
> Do you want to limit the try/catch scope to just
> serverSocketFactory.acceptSocket since setSocketOptions() can also throw
> IOException?
A couple of people have mentioned this and while the current code would
be OK with a broader try/catch I like the idea o
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
Summary: Unable to stop tomcat.
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.28
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Sorry - I meant to say - since the existing setSocketOptions() is in the
try/catch block as accept(). Is it possible for a network client to send
an ip packet to cause a failure and throw a SocketException while
internally tomcat is setting each of the socket options? So the net
effect is - the
On 23/02/2011 11:47, Tim Funk wrote:
> Sorry - I meant to say - since the existing setSocketOptions() is in the
> try/catch block as accept(). Is it possible for a network client to send
> an ip packet to cause a failure and throw a SocketException while
> internally tomcat is setting each of the s
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 23 11:58:47 2011
New Revision: 1073711
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1073711&view=rev
Log:
Better handling in acceptor threads if server hits ulimit for open files
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AbstractEndpoint.java
tomcat/trunk
I took a quick look at yesterdays log files to see what the proportion
of downloads was for the recent 5.5.x, 6.0.x and 7.0.x releases. After a
little filtering to try and ensure I was comparing like with like, the
results were:
Tomcat 5.5.33 - 23%
Tomcat 6.0.32 - 35%
Tomcat 7.0.8 - 42%
Looking a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50819
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Interesting to see TC 7.x at 32%
2011/2/23 Mark Thomas :
> I took a quick look at yesterdays log files to see what the proportion
> of downloads was for the recent 5.5.x, 6.0.x and 7.0.x releases. After a
> little filtering to try and ensure I was comparing like with like, the
> results were:
> To
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 23 19:23:59 2011
New Revision: 1073891
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1073891&view=rev
Log:
Add the SecurityListener (disabled by default) that prevents Tomcat from
starting if configured insecurely.
Added:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/security/Con
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 23 19:25:17 2011
New Revision: 1073893
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1073893&view=rev
Log:
Add security listener
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/security-howto.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/security-howto.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewv
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22405
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Mark,
On 2/23/2011 10:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I took a quick look at yesterdays log files to see what the proportion
> of downloads was for the recent 5.5.x, 6.0.x and 7.0.x releases. After a
> little filtering to try and ensure I was comparing like with like, the
> results were:
> Tomcat 5.5.
On 23/02/2011 20:00, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 2/23/2011 10:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I took a quick look at yesterdays log files to see what the proportion
>> of downloads was for the recent 5.5.x, 6.0.x and 7.0.x releases. After a
>> little filtering to try and ensure I was co
15 matches
Mail list logo