Re: [DISCUSS] Client side configuration for a SNI proxy

2020-03-20 Thread Dan Smith
Hi all, It looks like we have consensus to go forward with this proposal. I've moved it to the "In Development" state. Thanks all for your comments on this and the previous RFC for this feature. -Dan On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:35 AM Jason Huynh wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 7:27 AM J

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7832, GEODE-7853 & GEODE-7863 in Geode 1.12.0

2020-03-20 Thread Lynn Hughes-Godfrey
+1 On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:37 AM Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > +1 The changes and the risk looks minimal. > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 2:16 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > De: Donal Evans > > Enviado: jueves, 19 de marzo de 2020 2:14 > > Pa

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7832, GEODE-7853 & GEODE-7863 in Geode 1.12.0

2020-03-20 Thread Ernest Burghardt
There appears to be consensus that these are critical fixes. The following commit has been brought into release/1.12 as the critical fix for GEODE-7832: git cherry-pick -x 2a3e09f2da4793d08d1124b5d5e656285295937d GEODE-7832 has been marked as 'resolved in' 1.12. The following commit has been b

Welcome!

2020-03-20 Thread Anthony Baker
Over the last few months the Geode PMC has invited the following people as new committers and PMC members. We’ve been remiss in officially recognizing your new status, but welcome aboard! Thanks so much for your contributions to the project and we're looking forward to seeing more great things to

Re: Welcome!

2020-03-20 Thread Robert Houghton
And thank goodness! Plenty of work to share around. Welcome! On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 17:21 Anthony Baker wrote: > Over the last few months the Geode PMC has invited the following > people as new committers and PMC members. We’ve been remiss in > officially recognizing your new status, but welcome