Hi all, It looks like we have consensus to go forward with this proposal. I've moved it to the "In Development" state. Thanks all for your comments on this and the previous RFC for this feature.
-Dan On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:35 AM Jason Huynh <jhu...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 7:27 AM Joris Melchior <jmelch...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:33 PM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > A new RFC is up for this feature > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Client+side+configuration+for+a+SNI+proxy > > > . > > > > > > > > > Please review and comment by this Friday, 3/20/2020. > > > > > > This hopefully addresses some of the concerns with the previous RFC for > > > this feature. The new proposal is for a more general SocketFactory > > property > > > that users can implement, along the lines of what Jake and Owen > > suggested. > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Joris Melchior * > > CF Engineering > > Pivotal Toronto > > 416 877 5427 > > > > “Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for > > machines to execute.” – *Hal Abelson* > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Abelson> > > >
