Re: privacy protection

If you want to encrypt values at the client, you might want to check out this talk: https://springoneplatform.io/2018/sessions/implementing-pii-encryption-with-pdx-serialization Anthony > On Jan 21, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Michael Oleske wrote: > > Something to consider is what scenarios do you wa

Re: disable statistic archival

Try setting STATISTIC_SAMPLING_ENABLED to false to disable statistic sampling. I think we should delete "An empty string (default) disables statistic archival." from the javadocs for STATISTIC_ARCHIVE_FILE to avoid confusion and redundancy with STATISTIC_SAMPLING_ENABLED. See below for the javado

Re: disable statistic archival

I'm getting the impression that the user guide could be clearer with regard to the interactions between - enable-statistics - statistic-sampling-enabled - statistic-archive-file On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 9:30 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > Try setting STATISTIC_SAMPLING_ENABLED to false to disa

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

Thanks Naba & Jacob for your comments! @Naba: I have been implementing a solution as you suggested, and I think it would be convenient if the client knows the memberId of the server it is connected to. (current code is here: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4616 ) For example, in: Locat

Re: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

> On Jan 22, 2020, at 9:51 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > Thanks Naba & Jacob for your comments! > > > > @Naba: I have been implementing a solution as you suggested, and I think it > would be convenient if the client knows the memberId of the server it is > connected to. > > (

[DISCUSS] Cut 1.12.0 branch on February 3rd, 2020

Hello Geode, I'll be your release manager for Geode 1.12 and the plan is to cut the branch on February 3rd, 2020 (we'll avoid Groundhog Day and LeapDay as well...) As a reminder, only critical fixes will be allowed once the release branch is created, so it is helpful to have develop as stable as

Old geode-benchmark PRs

Hi, I noticed we have some old outstanding PRs for the geode-benchmarks project. Are any of these things we want to merge or should we close them out? https://github.com/apache/geode-benchmarks/pulls -Dan

Re: disable statistic archival

Dave, In your list, I think "enable-statistics" should be "enable-time-statistics". But, yes you're right! On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 9:46 AM Dave Barnes wrote: > I'm getting the impression that the user guide could be clearer with regard > to the interactions between > >- enable-statistics >

Re: Old geode-benchmark PRs

Two of those PRs are mine, so perhaps I can give a bit of context for people who might look at them. The oldest of the two, "Feature/Add PdxType benchmark and additional framework flexibility" was an attempt to quantify and maintain the improvement in performance for PdxType creation when large num

[Polite Request] Clean up branches on Geode

There's a lot of branches on Geode that look like they can be deleted because they have either been merged or closed. Below is a list. Please consider deleting your branch if you have created one of the below. Thanks! -michael The following branches on Geode have been merged feature/GEODE-7212

Re: Old geode-benchmark PRs

I hate to just close what’s there but it also likely needs some massaging. Additions to the benchmarks risk destabilizing the CI if the benchmark has a wide variance. I don’t have time right now to spend on tuning new benchmarks. If someone else does please step up and take it on. > On Jan 22,

Re: [Polite Request] Clean up branches on Geode

Also, please use your fork for branches! > On Jan 22, 2020, at 3:14 PM, Michael Oleske wrote: > > There's a lot of branches on Geode that look like they can be deleted > because they have either been merged or closed. Below is a list. Please > consider deleting your branch if you have created

Re: [Polite Request] Clean up branches on Geode

GitHub does have a setting to auto-delete PR branches once merged, but I think it’s safe to assume this community prefers to [forget to] delete them manually ;) > On Jan 22, 2020, at 3:14 PM, Michael Oleske wrote: > > There's a lot of branches on Geode that look like they can be deleted > bec

Question regarding a ConnectionPoolDUnitTest failure

Hi All, I could use a little help understanding the expected behavior for a test case. We are registering for events and we are getting destroys for destroys, creates for creates etc. However, in the case of a recreate, it seems like we are getting an entry event of LOCAL_LOAD_CREATE and some

Odg: disable statistic archival

@Kirk, in case we change --enable-statistic(this flag refer to STATISTIC_SAMPLING_ENABLED ) to false we lose some metrics in gfsh and pulse. What if we want to keep statistic on, but not archive it to file. I don't see now how to disable archiving statistics to file, but

Re: Odg: disable statistic archival

Would it work to archive them to file /dev/null On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:36 PM Mario Kevo wrote: > @Kirk, in case we change --enable-statistic(this > flag refer to STATISTIC_SAMPLING_ENABLED ) to false we lose some metrics in > gfsh and pulse. > What if we want to keep